Advertisement

Citizen Science Is in the Air – Engagement Mechanisms from Technology-Mediated Citizen Science Projects Addressing Air Pollution

  • Gavin McCrory
  • Carina Veeckman
  • Laurence Claeys
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10673)

Abstract

Environmental data is collected at unprecedented scales and speeds, targeting diverse societal challenges, and through the inclusion of multiple stakeholders. Yet, an understanding of enabling technologies involved in the engagement of citizens appear largely outside of the realm of air pollution. Recently, different air pollution projects have been rolled out in Europe and abroad; a structured analysis, however, of the way citizens are involved in these type of projects does not yet exist. In contribution to the ongoing EU-Funded project hackAIR, this paper therefore explores this research gap on the topic of air pollution and citizen science through the following question: Which engagement mechanisms can be identified in existing air pollution citizen science projects? We combine multiple literature sources, employ a systematic case study analysis and conduct seven qualitative interviews with key experts to target citizen science projects related to air pollution. Several mechanisms emerged at the interface between air pollution, citizen participation and knowledge production. These include: (1) Scale, (2) User-involvement and co-creation, (3) Communication, and (4) User motivation and aspects of behaviour. Despite its growing reputation in digital innovation, a majority of the mapped projects do not explicitly engage in any co-creation process. Multiple project insights suggest the importance of non-academic stakeholders as agents for communication and engagement. Campaign-based gamification can prove successful in establishing urgency in local contexts. Common engagement barriers include issues in the data contribution, science communication, technical project limitations, scaling and the critical nature of distributed sensors. This preliminary research offers a fruitful approach in assessing and comparing initiatives, and can enrich our understanding of the contribution that air pollution technology can have in citizen science.

Keywords

Citizen science Air pollution Open technology Community sensing Grassroots sensing 

References

  1. Alfonso, L., Chacón, J.C., Peña, G.: Allowing citizens to effortlessly become rainfall sensors. In: E-Proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress, 28 June – 3 July 2015, The Hague, The Netherlands, (1), pp. 1–5 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. Arniani, M., Badii, A., Liddo, A., Georgi, S., Passani, A., Piccolo, L.S.G., Teli, M.: Collective awareness platforms for sustainability and social innovation: an introduction. (2014). http://booksprints-for-ict-research.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/BS5-CAPS-FIN-003.pdf
  3. Barney, D.: The morning after: citizen engagement in technological society. Techne 9(3), 23–31 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. Bonney, R., Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V., Shirk, J.: Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 59(11), 977–984 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Certomà, C., Corsini, F., Rizzi, F.: Crowdsourcing urban sustainability. Data, people and technologies in participatory governance. Futures 74, 93–106 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fritz, S., McCallum, I., Schill, C., Perger, C., Grillmayer, R., Achard, F., Kraxner, F., Obersteiner, M.: Geo-wiki.org: The use of crowdsourcing to improve global land cover. Remote Sens. 1(3), 345–354 (2009) http://doi.org/10.3390/rs1030345
  7. Geoghegan, H., Dyke, A., Pateman, R., West, S., Everett, G.: Understanding Motivations for Citizen Science, May 2016Google Scholar
  8. Haklay, M.: Citizen Science and Policy: A European Perspective, 4 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. Higgins, C.I., Williams, J., Leibovici, D.G., Simonis, I., Davis, M.J., Muldoon, C., van Genuchten, P., O’hare, G., Wiemann, S.: Citizen observatory web cobweb a generic infrastructure platform to facilitate the collection of citizen science data for environmental monitoring. Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastruct. Res. 11, 20–48 (2016) http://doi.org/10.2902/1725-0463.2016.11.art3
  10. Kruger, L.E., Shannon, M.A.: Getting to know ourselves and our places through participation in civic social assessment. Soc. Nat. Resour. 13, 461–478 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Land-Zandstra, A.M., Devilee, J.L.A., Snik, F., Buurmeijer, F., van den Broek, J.M.: Citizen science on a smartphone: participants’ motivations and learning. Pub. Underst. Sci. (Bristol, England), 25(1), 45–60. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515602406
  12. Leonardi, C., Cappellotto, A., Caraviello, M., Lepri, B., Antonelli, F.: SecondNose: an air quality mobile crowdsensing system. In: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Fun, Fast, Foundational – NordiCHI 2014, pp. 1051–1054 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2670273
  13. Nov, O., Arazy, O., Anderson, D.: Technology-mediated citizen science participation: a motivational model. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 249–256, July 2011 http://doi.org/10.1145/1940761.1940771
  14. Olsson, P., Lebel, L., Garden, P., Berkes, F., Adger, W. N., Cash, D. W., Pritchard, L., Young, O.: Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8 (2006). http://uu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1La9wwEBbbQKCX0jYpSR-gUy_GwSvZlhToYZPmQcmLPC65LNYrmKTe4Oz-_44kv3bJoQ3pxdjC2Ov9Ps9o5G9mEKJkJ4lXbIIEN6ETZrlOhVHEFQrTlNBc0hwcsq-4cXrLJ2f81yk_GI3ayhX92H8FHsYAepdI-w_gdxeFAdgHCsAWSADbv6LBFWAQvhDsO38Y
  15. Poliakoff, E., Webb, T.L.: What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Sci. Commun. 29, 242–263 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Powell, M.C., Colin, M.: Meaningful citizen engagement in science and technology what would it really take? Sci. Commun. 30(1), 126–136 (2008). http://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008320520
  17. Rotman, D., Hammock, J., Preece, J., Hansen, D., Boston, C., Bowser, A., He, Y.: Motivations affecting initial and long-term participation in citizen science projects in three countries. iConference, 110–124 (2014). http://doi.org/10.9776/14054
  18. Sanders, E.B.-N.: From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In: Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections, pp. 1–8 (2002)Google Scholar
  19. Sîrbu, A., Becker, M., Caminiti, S., De Baets, B., Elen, B., Francis, L., Gravino, P., Hotho, A., Ingarra, S., Loreto, V., Molino, A., Mueller, J., Peters, J., van den Bossche, J.: Participatory patterns in an international air quality monitoring initiative. PLoS ONE, 10(8), 1–19 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136763
  20. Yin, R.K.: Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. Guilford Publications, New York City (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gavin McCrory
    • 1
  • Carina Veeckman
    • 1
  • Laurence Claeys
    • 1
  1. 1.imec - SMIT, Vrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations