Advertisement

Explaining Compensation in Post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Case of Victims of Torture and Sexual Violence

  • Jessie Hronešová
Chapter
Part of the St Antony's Series book series (STANTS)

Abstract

This chapter explains the different compensation outcomes for two categories of war victims in post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH)—victims of sexual violence and victims of torture. Unlike victims of torture who have no formal rights vis-à-vis any authorities in BiH, survivors of sexual violence have since 2006 been recognized as a victim category with compensation rights. This chapter explains these outcomes using rationalist arguments and shows that compensation for victims is mainly determined by whether and how victim associations leverage their moral authority and mobilization resources, as well as the international salience of their demands to convince domestic political authorities that compensation is expedient. Acting as policy drivers, this chapter presents victims through the prism of activism but also explores some tensions in the growing debates about the politics of victimhood.

Keywords

Compensation Mobilization Sexual violence Torture Transitional justice Victim Victimhood 

References

  1. Adhikari, P., Hansen, W. L., & Powers, K. L. (2012). The demand for reparations. Grievance, risk, and the pursuit of justice in civil war settlement. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(2), 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, B. (1996). Rape warfare: The hidden genocide in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Augustinovic, M. (2016). Logorašima umjesto odštete sudski troškovi [Instead of compensation, detainees asked to pay court costs]. Radio Slobodna Evropa. April 2. Retrieved from http://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/plp-logorasima-umjesto-odstete-sudski-troskovi/27648704.html
  4. Bassiouni, M. C. (1994). Final report of the Commission of Expers Established Pursuant to SC Resolution 780 (1992). United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.icty.org/x/file/About/OTP/un_commission_of_experts_report1994_en.pdf
  5. Bieber, F. (2008). Dayton after Dayton? The evolution of an unpopular peace. In M. Weller & S. Wolff (Eds.), Internationalized state-building after violent conflict: Bosnia ten years after Dayton (pp. 14–30). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Blagojević, M. (2013). Transnationalization and its absence. In J. Hearn, M. Blagojević, & K. Harrison (Eds.), Rethinking transnational men: Beyond, between and within nations (pp. 163–183). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bose, S. (2002). Bosnia after Dayton: Nationalist partition and international intervention. London: C. Hurst & Co. Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. van Boven, T. (2010). The United Nations basic principles and guidelines on the right to a remedy and reparation for victims of gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  9. Božić, S. (2014). How much does justice cost in Bosnia and Herzegovina? In M. Toma (Ed.), Regional school for transitional justice: Journal (pp. 177–184). Belgrade: Humanitarian Law Center.Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter, C. R. (2006). Innocent women and children’: Gender, norms and the protection of civilians. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  11. Christie, N. (1986). The ideal victim. In From crime policy to victim policy (pp. 17–30). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, J. N. (2016). Transitional justice as recognition: An analysis of the women’s court in Sarajevo. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10(1), 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cockburn, C. (2001). The gendered dynamics of armed conflict and political violence. In C. N. Moser & F. Clark (Eds.), Victims, perpetrators or actors?: Gender, armed conflict and political violence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Cousens, E. M., Kumar, C., & Wermester, K. (2001). Peacebuilding as politics: Cultivating peace in fragile societies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. De Greiff, P. (2006). Justice and reparations. In P. De Greiff (Ed.), The handbook of reparations (pp. 451–477). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delpla, I. (2014). La justice des gens: enquêtes dans la Bosnie des nouvelles après-guerres [Justice of the people: Investigation of the new post-war in Bosnia]. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
  17. Dixon, P. J. (2016). Reparations, assistance and the experience of justice: Lessons from Colombia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10(1), 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faber, M., & Stiglmayer, A. (1994). Mass rape: The war against women in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  19. FENA. (2014). Dukić: Republici Srpskoj zbog tužbi bivših logoraša prijeti bankrot [Dukic: Because of former detainees RS is on the verge of bankruptcy]. 24sata.info. March 20. Retrieved from http://www.24sata.info/vijesti/bosna-i-hercegovina/186334-dukic-republici-srpskoj-zbog-tuzbi-bivsih-logorasa-prijeti-bankrot.html
  20. García-Godos, J. (2013). Victims’ rights and distributive justice: In search of actors. Human Rights Review, 14(3), 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grodsky, B. (2011). The costs of justice: How new leaders respond to previous rights abuses. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hagan, J. (2003). Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting war crimes in the Hague Tribunal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helms, E. (2007). Politics is a whore’: Women, morality and victimhood in post-war Bosnia-Herzegovina. In X. Bougarel, E. Helms, & G. Duijzings (Eds.), The new Bosnian mosaic: Identities, memories and moral claims in a post-war society (pp. 235–254). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Helms, E. (2013). Innocence and victimhood: Gender, nation, and women’s activism in postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hronešová, J. (2012). Everyday ethno-national identities of young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Irvine, J. A. (2013). Leveraging change: Women’s organizations and the implementation of UNSCR 1325 in the Balkans. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15(1), 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jouhanneau, C. (2013a). La résistance des témoins: Mémoires de guerre, nationalisme et vie quotidienne en Bosnie-Herzégovine (1992–2010) [The resistance of the witnesses. War memories, nationalism and everyday life in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992–2010)]. Paris: CERI-Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  28. Jouhanneau, C. (2013b). Would-be guardians of memory: An association of camp inmates of the 1992–5 Bosnian War under ethnographic scrutiny. In G. Mink & L. Neumayer (Eds.), History, memory and politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Memory games (pp. 23–38). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Katana, G. (2008). SPONA htjela mirno, ali nije im se dalo [SPONA wanted peaceful but did not try much]. Oslobođenje. February 27. Retrieved from www.infobiro.ba
  30. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kim, H. J. (2012). Structural determinants of human rights prosecutions after democratic transition. Journal of Peace Research, 49(2), 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kiza, E., Rathgeber, C., & Rohne, H.-C. (2006). Victims of war: An empirical study on war-victimization and victims’ attitudes towards addressing atrocities. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition HIS Verlagsges.Google Scholar
  33. Korac, M. (2006). Gender, conflict and peace-building: Lessons from the conflict in the former Yugoslavia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 510–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kriger, N. J. (2003). Guerrilla veterans in post-war Zimbabwe: Symbolic and violent politics, 1980–1987. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kulaga, V. (2011). Udar na budžet Srpske težak 420 miliona KM [Budget of Srpska hit by 420 Million]. Glas Srpske. March 23. Retrieved from http://www.glassrpske.com/novosti/vijesti_dana/Udar-na-budzet-Srpske-tezak-420-miliona-KM/lat/55438.html
  36. McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mosse, G. L. (1991). Fallen soldiers: Reshaping the memory of the world wars. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Nalepa, M. (2010). Skeletons in the closet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nettelfield, L. J., & Wagner, S. (2013). Srebrenica in the aftermath of genocide. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Olsen, T. D., Payne, L. A., & Reiter, A. (2010). Transitional justice in balance: Comparing processes, weighing efficacy. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  41. Powers, K. L., & Proctor, K. (2015). Victim’s justice in the aftermath of political violence: Why do countries award reparations? Foreign Policy Analysis, 1–24.Google Scholar
  42. Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (2013). The persistent power of human rights: From commitment to compliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roll, K. C. (2014). Inventing the veteran, imagining the state: Post-conflict reintegration and state consolidation in Timor-Leste, 1999–2002. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Simić, O., & Volčić, Z. (2014). In the land of wartime rape: Bosnia, cinema and reparation. Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity, 2(2), 377–401.Google Scholar
  45. Skjelsbaek, I. (2011). The political psychology of war rape: Studies from Bosnia and Herzegovina. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Subotic, J. (2009). Hijacked justice: Dealing with the past in the Balkans. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tabeau, E., & Zwierzchowski, J. (2010). The 1992–95 war in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Census-based multiple system estimation of casualties’ undercount. Berlin: ICTY.Google Scholar
  48. Tabučić, I. (2003). Logoraši hoće zakon i odštetu [Camp Inmates want a Law and Compensation]. Nezavisne novine. June 27. Retrieved from www.infoteka.ba
  49. Tilly, C. (1978). The routinization of protest in nineteenth-century France. Working Paper 181. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/50956
  50. Tokača, M. (2012). The Bosnian book of the dead. Human Losses in Bosnia and Herzegovina 1991–1995. Sarajevo: Research and Documentation Center.Google Scholar
  51. Walsh, M. (2008). Gendering international justice: Progress and pitfalls at international criminal tribunals. In D. Pankhurst (Ed.), Gendered peace: Women’s struggles for post-war justice and reconciliation (pp. 31–64). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Wemmers, J.-A. M. (2014). The healing role of reparation. In J.-A. M. Wemmers (Ed.), Reparation for victims of crimes against humanity: The healing role of reparation (pp. 221–233). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2010). Truth commissions and transitional societies: The impact on human rights and democracy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Wilson, R. A. (2001). The politics of truth and reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the post-apartheid state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wolfe, S. (2013). The politics of reparations and apologies. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  56. Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Women, citizenship and difference. Feminist review, 57(1), 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Žarkov, D. (2007). The body of war: Media, ethnicity, and gender in the break-up of Yugoslavia. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

List of Interviews

  1. Interview 01/SA/NG. Goran B., Peacebuilding Network, Sarajevo, 7 April 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Interview 03/ZN/NG. Sabiha Husić, Medica Zenica, Sarajevo, 14 September 2015.Google Scholar
  3. Interview 17/TZ/NG. Branka Antić-Štauber, Snaga žene, Tuzla, 15 August 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Interview 31/SA/MD. Nidžara Ahmetašević, journalist, New York, 5 December 2015.Google Scholar
  5. Interview 33/BL/EX. Srdjan Puhalo, independent political analyst, Banja Luka, 19 April 2015.Google Scholar
  6. Interview 41/VS/CV. Dragiša A., Camp Inmates Association, Višegrad, 11 August 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Interview 45/BC/VT. Almir T., Union of Demobilized Fighters, Bihać, 15 August 2014.Google Scholar
  8. Interview 53/KL/CV. Enes S., Association of Detainees, Kljuć, 2 September 2014.Google Scholar
  9. Interview 62/SA/EX. Lejla M., human rights expert, Sarajevo, 2 April 2015.Google Scholar
  10. Interview 70/SA/CV. Jasmin Mešković, Union of Camp Inmates of FBIH, Sarajevo, 2 April 2015.Google Scholar
  11. Interview 84/TZ/NG. Sinan Alić, Foundation Truth, Justice and Reconciliation, Tuzla, 17 August 2015.Google Scholar
  12. Interview 98/CV/SA. Almin, Union of Camp Inmates of the Canton Sarajevo, 2 April 2015.Google Scholar
  13. Interview 99/BL/CV. Zijahudin S., Association of Camp Inmates, Banja Luka, 15 April 2015.Google Scholar
  14. Interview 106/SA/VT. Ismet I., United Organization of Fighters, Sarajevo, 7 September 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessie Hronešová
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Politics and International RelationsSt Antony’s College, University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations