Advertisement

E-collaborating for Environmentally Sustainable Health Curricula

  • Peter MusaeusEmail author
  • Caroline Wellbery
  • Sarah Walpole
  • Hanna-Andrea Rother
  • Aditya Vyas
  • Kathleen Leedham-Green
Chapter
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Purpose

This chapter aims to demonstrate how medical educators can use e-collaborative tools to collaborating internationally and cross-institutionally towards designing environmental sustainability and health (ESH) education. The main focus of the chapter is on sustainable medical curricula.

Methodology

The chapter uses a case-study approach to bridge these broader e-collaborative principles with the specifics of implementation driven and supported by e-collaboration.

Findings

The case study describes the evolution of the Sustainable Healthcare Education (SHE)-network into a network collaborative. Finally, the chapter discusses e-collaboration for education development through an illustrative case. The case concerns an UK-Greek University e-collaboration aimed at combating obesity and promoting climate literacy.

Research implications

E-collaboration is central at all levels of the ESH curriculum design process from forming a network collaborative around the curriculum process, alignment of assessment and learning activities with objectives, discussing and agreeing on a vision to the actual implementation plan.

Practical implications

E-collaboration aids the curriculum design process such that people feel that their participation and interests are valued, as well as providing resources and input to resource stressed academics and institutions. E-collaboration is not an end in itself, but a means of enabling a global network collaborative to address an issue that suits this type of collaboration towards sustainable healthcare education.

Originality

This chapter is inventive in showing how the promotion of climate literacy can be a component of a sustainable medical curriculum and how this process is facilitated with e-collaborative tools. The chapter demonstrates how health education should educate climate literate health professionals who are able to address and reduce public health impacts of climate change.

Keywords

Medical curriculum Environmental sustainability Network collaboration Climate literacy Case study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

First, for creating Fig. 1, our heartfelt thanks to Matthew D. Mueller, DO/MPH, Des Moines University College of Osteopathic Medicine. Second, funding was instrumental in physically bringing together members of the SHE Network on two occasions. The first funding, a Collaborative Teaching Grant from the UK Higher Education Academy allowed a national consultation process involving 64 participants to be held around the three Priority Learning Outcomes on sustainability. The second, funding for the collaboration between King’s College London, UK (KCL) was in part from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece (AUTH).

References

  1. Briggs, C. L. (2007). Curriculum collaboration: A key to continuous program renewal. The Journal of Higher Education., 78(6), 676–711. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2007.11772076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Costello, A., Abbas, M., Allen, A., Ball, S., Bell, S., Bellamy, R., et al. (2009). Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. The Lancet., 373(9676), 1693–1733. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crawford, R. (2006). Health as a meaningful social practice. Health, 10(4), 401–420. doi: 10.1177/1363459306067310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006). Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among U.S. and Canadian medical schools. Academic Medicine, 81(4), 354–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fetterman, D. M. (2001). The transformation of evaluation into a collaboration: A vision of evaluation in the 21st century. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frehywot, S., Vovides, Y., Talib, Z., Mikhail, N., Ross, H., & Wohltjen, H., et al. (2013). E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low- and middle-income countries. Human Resources & Health, 11(4). doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-4.
  7. Harden, R. M. (2006). International medical education and future directions: A global perspective. Academic Medicine, 81(12), S22–S29. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000243411.19573.58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kapucu, N. (2006). Public-nonprofit partnerships for collective action in dynamic contexts of emergencies. Public Administration, 84(1), 205–220. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2006.00500.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Negev, M., & Kovats, R. S. (2016). Climate change adaptation in the reorganized UK public health system: A view from local government. Public health, 134, 102–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ozcan, Y. A., & Khushalani, J. (2016). Assessing efficiency of public health and medical care provision in OECD countries after a decade of reform. Central European Journal of Operations Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10100-016-0440-0.
  11. Pencheon, D. & Roschnick, S. (2012). Sustainability in the NHS Health Check 2012. NHS Sustainable Development Unit. Cambridge, UK: NHS Sustainable Development Unit, 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.sduhealth.org.uk/documents/publications/Sustainability_in_the_NHS_Health_Check_2012_On-Screen_Version.pdf.
  12. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. 10.1108/10748120110424816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosalind, J. (2014). ICT’s participatory potential in higher education collaborations: Reality or just talk. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 557–570. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schauer, B., & Zeiller, M. (2011). E-collaboration systems: How collaborative they really are analysis of collaboration features of electronic collaboration systems. In The First International Conference on Advanced Collaborative Networks, Systems and Applications, IARIA (pp. 16–21). ISBN: 978-1-61208-143-4.Google Scholar
  15. Starfield, B., & Shi, L. (2002). Policy relevant determinants of health: An international perspective. Health Policy, 60(3), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Teherani, A. (In preparation). Validation of sustainability learning objectives. Journal Article Manuscript.Google Scholar
  17. Thompson, T., Walpole, S., Braithwaite, I., Inman, A., Barna, S., & Mortimer, F. (2014). Learning objectives for sustainable health care. The Lancet, 384, 1924–1925. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62274-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. United Nations General Assembly. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment the role of collaborative networks in sustainability 17 and development: Our common future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427—Development and International Co-operation: Environment. Retrieved from: http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.
  19. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2006). Trade in Higher Education and GATS (Briefing paper on GATS). Retrieved from: http://www.unesco.org/education/studyingabroad/highlights.
  20. Walpole, S., Vyas, A., Maxwell, J., Canny, B. J., Woolard, R., & Wellbery, C., et al. (2017). Building an environmentally accountable medical curriculum through international collaboration. Medical Teacher, 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1342031.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Musaeus
    • 1
    Email author
  • Caroline Wellbery
    • 2
  • Sarah Walpole
    • 3
  • Hanna-Andrea Rother
    • 4
  • Aditya Vyas
    • 5
  • Kathleen Leedham-Green
    • 6
  1. 1.CESUAarhus UniversityAarhus NDenmark
  2. 2.Georgetown University School of MedicineWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Hull York Medical SchoolYorkUK
  4. 4.Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Family MedicineUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  5. 5.Norwich Medical SchoolUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  6. 6.King’s College London School of MedicineLondonUK

Personalised recommendations