Green Energy Water-Autonomous Greenhouse System: An Alternative Technology Approach Toward Sustainable Smart–Green Vertical Greening in a Smart City

Chapter
Part of the Strategies for Sustainability book series (STSU)

Abstract

By means of “going greener,” “getting smarter,” and “converging smart–green,” an innovation-driven smart city could take steps toward greater sustainability and aim at greater human well-being. Vertical greening means a vertical triumph of greenery in a high-density urban area; it is well suited to displaying the level of smartness and greenness in a city. But conventional vertical greening is used in an open-field way, unprotected, threatened by climate disasters such as high wind speed and heavy rainfall, and with lack of control of climate conditions and plant-response-based circumstances. Then there are the challenges of energy saving, reduced CO2 emissions, and reductions in water use and in pesticide use. A greenhouse system could instead solve different facets of the problems of conventional vertical greening because a greenhouse system could be developed to achieve an optimal balance between efficient environmental control and efficient plant use of available resources. This appears to be more intellectually justifiable, adaptable, and innovative, and appears to make it much easier to be smart–green and sustainable in a smart city. The purposes of this chapter are to summarize the major concepts and trends in smart city, vertical greening, and new greenhouse technologies and approaches by reviewing relevant subjects of research, and to present a novel prototype, discussing its innovations and advantages to reveal that the proposed green energy water-autonomous greenhouse system (GEWA system), being a sophisticated and multidisciplinary system by using water resources and solar energy in a rational way, could be fit for an alternative technology approach toward sustainable smart–green vertical greening in a smart city. Aimed at improving responsiveness, efficiency, and performance for environmental sustainability, resource sustainability, and material and technological sustainability, and also aimed at greater well-being.

Keywords

Green energy water-autonomous greenhouse system Sustainability Smart-green Vertical greening Smart city 

References

  1. Abdel-Ghany AM, Al-Helal IM (2011) Solar energy utilization by a greenhouse: general relation. Renew Energy 36:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attmann O (2010) Green architecture: advanced technologies and materials. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Baeza EJ, Perez Parra J et al (2009) Analysis of the role of sidewall vents on buoyancy-driven natural ventilation in parral-type greenhouses with and without insect screens using computational fluid dynamics. Biosyst Eng 104:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker JC, Adams SR et al (2008) Innovative technologies for an efficient use of energy. Acta Hortic 801(1):49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balas MM (2014) Seven passive greenhouse synergies. Acta Polytechnica 11:199–210Google Scholar
  6. Buchholz M, Zaragoza G et al (2004) Thermal control of an isolated greenhouse for optimized food production and greywater recycling: the Watergy project, International Astronautical Federation—55th International Astronautical Congress 2004, vol 3, pp 1681–1688Google Scholar
  7. Buchholz M, Buchholz R et al (2006) Temperature and humidity control in the watergy greenhouse. Acta Hortic 719:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchholz M, Schmidt M et al (2008) Overcoming drought. Implementation guide of the “Cycler Support” project, RTD FP 6-INCO. Ref. Nr. 031697Google Scholar
  9. Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P (2009) Smart Cities in Europe, Series ResGoogle Scholar
  10. Giacomelli G (2007) Innovation in greenhouse engineering for GreenSys2007, New AG International, GreenSys pages at: www.newaginternational.com
  11. Hatzelhoffer L, Humboldt K et al (2012) Smart city in practice. Jovis Verlag GmbH, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Hemming S, Speetjens SL et al (2014) Greenhouse design for vegetable production in subtropical climate in Taiwan. Acta Hortic 1037:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jochum P, Buchholz M (2005) How to simulate thermal and fluid dynamical processes in closed greenhouses including water interactions between plants and air. Acta Hortic 691:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katsoulas N, Sapounas A et al (2015) Reducing ventilation requirements in semi-closed greenhouses increases water use efficiency. Agric Water Manag 156:90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kwok AG, Grondzik WT (2011) The green studio handbook. Taylor & Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Lamnatou C, Chemisana D (2013) Solar radiation manipulations and their role in greenhouse claddings: fluorescent solar concentrators, photoselective and other materials. Renew Sust Energ Rev 27:175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meadows DH (2008) Thinking in systems—a primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River JunctionGoogle Scholar
  18. Montero JI, Van Henten EJ et al (2011) Greenhouse engineering: new technologies and approaches. Acta Hortic 893:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Opdam JJG, Schoonderbeek GG et al (2005) Closed greenhouse: a starting point for sustainable entrepreneurship in horticulture. Acta Hortic 691:517–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Orgaz F, Fernandez MD et al (2005) Evapotranspiration of horticultural crops in an unheated plastic greenhouse. Agric Water Manag 72:81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peng KH, Kuo YC et al (2015) The use of vertical greening in urban rehabilitation to improve sustainability of the environment in Taiwan. Int Rev Spat Plan Sustain Dev 3(1):5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perez Parra J, Baeza E et al (2004) Natural ventilation of parral greenhouses. Biosyst Eng 87(3):355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Speetjens SL, Stigter JD et al (2009) Towards an adaptive model for greenhouse control. Comput Electron Agric 67:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Speetjens SL, Stigter JD et al (2010) Physics-based model for a water-saving greenhouse. Biosyst Eng 105:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tantau HJ, Schmidt U et al (2011) Low energy greenhouse—a system approach. Acta Hortic 893:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Teitel M, Ziskind G et al (2008) Effect of wind direction on greenhouse ventilation rate, airflow patterns and temperature distributions. Biosyst Eng 101:351–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Teitel M, Baeza EJ et al (2012) Greenhouse design: concepts and trends. Acta Hortic 952:605–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vadiee A, Martin V (2012) Energy management in horticulture applications through the closed greenhouse concept, state of the art. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:5087–5100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vadiee A, Martin V (2013) Thermal energy storage strategies for effective closed greenhouse design. Appl Energy 109:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Kooten O, Heuvelink E et al (2008) New developments in greenhouse technology can mitigate the water shortage problem of the 21st century. Acta Hortic 767:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zaragoza G, Buchholz M (2008) Closed greenhouses for semi-arid climates: critical discussion following the results of the Watergy prototype. Acta Hortic 797:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zaragoza G, Baeza E et al (2005) The Watergy greenhouse: a closed system for solar thermal energy collection, water treatment and advanced horticulture. In: SAE international conference on environmental systems, paper #: 2005-01-2919Google Scholar
  33. Zaragoza G, Buchholz M et al (2007) Watergy project: towards a rational use of water in greenhouse agriculture and sustainable architecture. Desalination 211:296–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Doctoral Program in Design, College of DesignNational Taipei University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Institute of DesignTaipei University of TechnologyTaipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations