Advertisement

Gaze Behavioral Adaptation Towards Group Members for Providing Effective Recommendations

  • Silvia Rossi
  • Pasquale D’Alterio
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10652)

Abstract

An adequate robot gaze control is essential for successful and natural human-robot interactions. In multi-party contexts, the effective use of the gaze shared among the participants may have a strong impact in keeping the participants’ attention and obtaining a persuasive effect. To gain a deeper understanding of how the robot gaze behavior might influence and shape the human perception of the interaction and the decision-making process in small groups, we conducted a between-subjects experimental study using a humanoid robot in a movie recommendation scenario. Our results showed that different gaze behaviors resulted in different group acceptance rates if combined with the personal acceptance of the group members. However, users were not able to differentiate the behaviors in term of naturalness and persuasiveness. Moreover, results showed that other factors, such as the length of the recommendation, play a significant role in the users’ perception of the interaction naturalness.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work has been partially supported by MIUR within the PRIN2015 research project “User-centered Profiling and Adaptation for Socially Assistive Robotics - UPA4SAR”.

References

  1. 1.
    Admoni, H., Hayes, B., Feil-Seifer, D., Ullman, D., Scassellati, B.: Are you looking at me?: perception of robot attention is mediated by gaze type and group size. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on HRI, pp. 389–396 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cozzolongo, G., De Carolis, B., Pizzutilo, S.: Social robots as mediators between users and smart environments. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2007, pp. 353–356. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dautenhahn, K.: I could be you: the phenomenological dimension of social understanding. Cybern. Syst. 28(5), 417–453 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ham, J., Cuijpers, R.H., Cabibihan, J.J.: Combining robotic persuasive strategies: the persuasive power of a storytelling robot that uses gazing and gestures. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7(4), 479–487 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Imai, M., Kanda, T., Ono, T., Ishiguro, H., Mase, K.: Robot mediated round table: analysis of the effect of robot’s gaze. In: Proceedings of 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 411–416 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karreman, D.E., Bradford, G.U.S., van Dijk, E.M., Lohse, M., Evers, V.: Picking favorites: the influence of robot eye-gaze on interactions with multiple users. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 123–128, November 2013Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kleinke, C.L.: Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychol. Bull. 100(1), 78–100 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koda, T., Ogura, M., Matsui, Y.: Shyness level and sensitivity to gaze from agents - are shy people sensitive to agent’s gaze? In: Traum, D., Swartout, W., Khooshabeh, P., Kopp, S., Scherer, S., Leuski, A. (eds.) IVA 2016. LNCS, vol. 10011, pp. 359–363. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mutlu, B., Forlizzi, J., Hodgins, J.: A storytelling robot: modeling and evaluation of human-like gaze behavior. In: 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 518–523, December 2006Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mutlu, B., Kanda, T., Forlizzi, J., Hodgins, J., Ishiguro, H.: Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robots. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 1(2), 1–33 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mutlu, B., Shiwa, T., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Footing in human-robot conversations: how robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues. In: 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on HRI, pp. 61–68. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pelachaud, C., Bilvi, M.: Modelling gaze behavior for conversational agents. In: Rist, T., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Rickel, J. (eds.) IVA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2792, pp. 93–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-39396-2_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rossi, S., Cervone, F.: Social utilities and personality traits for group recommendation: a pilot user study. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 38–46 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shinozawa, K., Naya, F., Kogure, K., Yamato, J.: Effect of robot’s tracking users on human decision making. In: IROS, pp. 1908–1913. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Staffa, M., Gregorio, M.D., Giordano, M., Rossi, S.: Can you follow that guy?. In: 22th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, ESANN, pp. 511–516 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Staffa, M., Rossi, S.: Recommender interfaces: the more human-like, the more humans like. In: Agah, A., Cabibihan, J.-J., Howard, A.M., Salichs, M.A., He, H. (eds.) ICSR 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9979, pp. 200–210. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoshino, T., Takase, Y., Nakano, Y.I.: Controlling robot’s gaze according to participation roles and dominance in multiparty conversations. In: Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on HRI, Extended Abstracts, pp. 127–128. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zheng, M., Moon, A., Croft, E.A., Meng, M.Q.H.: Impacts of robot head gaze on robot-to-human handovers. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7(5), 783–798 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Information TechnologyUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations