Advertisement

User’s Personality and Activity Influence on HRI Comfortable Distances

  • Silvia Rossi
  • Mariacarla Staffa
  • Luigi Bove
  • Roberto Capasso
  • Giovanni Ercolano
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10652)

Abstract

A robot system that is designed to coexist with humans has to adapt its behavior and social interaction parameters (for example, the interaction distances and the speed of movements) not only with respect to the task it is supposed to accomplish, but also to the human users’ habits, actions, and personality. This is particularly relevant in the domain of assistive robotics and when working with vulnerable people. In this work, we are interested in determining key factors to model the user and to adapt the robot behavior accordingly. We provide the first step towards this direction with a case study aiming at evaluating if the users’ personality and activities they are currently performing affect the perception of comfortable distances of a robot approaching them.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work has been partially supported by MIUR (Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research) within the PRIN 2015 research project “User-centerd Profiling and Adaptation for Socially Assistive Robotics - UPA4SAR”.

References

  1. 1.
    Caccavale, R., Leone, E., Lucignano, L., Rossi, S., Staffa, M., Finzi, A.: Attentional regulations in a situated human-robot dialogue. In: RO-MAN, pp. 844–849. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cakmak, M., Srinivasa, S., Lee, M.K., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S.: Human preferences for robot-human hand-over configurations. In: IEEE (ed.) IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, September 2011Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cavallo, F., Aquilano, M., Carrozza, M., Dario, P.: Robot-era project: the vision of 3D service robotics. Gerontechnology 11(2), 364 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conti, D., Cattani, A., Nuovo, S.D., Nuovo, A.D.: A cross-cultural study of acceptance and use of robotics by future psychology practitioners. In: 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 555–560 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duncan, B.A., Murphy, R.R.: A preliminary model for comfortable approach distance based on environmental conditions and personal factors. In: Smari, W.W., Fox, G.C. (eds.) CTS, pp. 622–627. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall, E.T.: The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday & Co., Garden City (1966)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huettenrauch, H., Eklundh, K.S., Green, A., Topp, E.A.: Investigating spatial relationships in human-robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5052–5059, October 2006Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    John, O.P., Srivastava, S.: The big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin, L.A., John, O.P. (eds.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2nd edn., pp. 102–138. Guilford Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Obaid, M., Sandoval, E.B., Zotowski, J., Moltchanova, E., Basedow, C.A., Bartneck, C.: Stop! that is close enough. how body postures influence human-robot proximity. In: 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 354–361, August 2016Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rossi, S., Ercolano, G., Staffa, M.: Towards an adaptive user monitoring based on personality and activity recognition. In: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2017, NY, USA, pp. 269–270. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rossi, S., Ferland, F., Tapus, A.: User profiling and behavioral adaptation for HRI: a survey. Pattern Recogn. Lett. (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2017.06.002
  12. 12.
    Sidobre, D., Broqure, X., Mainprice, J., Burattini, E., Finzi, A., Rossi, S., Staffa, M.: Human-robot interaction. In: Siciliano, B. (ed.) Advanced Bimanual Manipulation. STAR, vol. 80, pp. 123–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-29041-1_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Walters, M.L., Koay, K.L.: ‘Doing the right thing wrong’ - personality and tolerance to uncomfortable robot approaches. In: The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), pp. 183–188 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Syrdal, D.S., Koay, K.L., Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K.: A personalized robot companion - the role of individual differences on spatial preferences in HRI scenarios. In: The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 1143–1148 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takayama, L., Pantofaru, C.: Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5495–5502, October 2009Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tapus, A., Tăpus, C., Matarić, M.J.: User-robot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. Intel. Serv. Robot. 1(2), 169–183 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., te Boekhorst, R., Koay, K.L., Woods, S., Nehaniv, C., Lee, D., Werry, I.: The influence of subjects’ personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment. In: IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 347–352, August 2005Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S.N., Koay, K.L., Boekhorst, R.T., Lee, D.: Exploratory studies on social spaces between humans and a mechanical-looking robot. Connect. Sci. 18(4), 429–439 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Rossi
    • 1
  • Mariacarla Staffa
    • 2
  • Luigi Bove
    • 1
  • Roberto Capasso
    • 1
  • Giovanni Ercolano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Information TechnologyUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of EngineeringUniversity of Naples ParthenopeNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations