User Engagement Continuum: Art Engagement and Exploration with Augmented Reality
The most common way to consume art is through observation and acknowledgement of its existence. From the viewpoint of preserving art and cultural heritage, such passive consumption seems adequate. From the viewpoint of preserving art and cultural heritage, such passive consumption seems adequate. Yet, passive consumptions hinders users’ potential for exploration, creation and expression by not allowing to build upon existing artworks. Novel technologies could change this and augmented reality (AR) is one of the most promising by offering the possibility of mixing physical artworks with digitally augmented users’ creations and/or curation of personalised exhibitions. However, novel technologies could change this and augmented reality (AR) is one of the most promising by offering the possibility of mixing physical artworks with digitally augmented users’ creations and/or curation of personalised exhibitions. In a similar way that web enabled users to become active participants in, for example, commenting, sharing views, rating and deciding on the course of television shows in real time, AR could act as a medium to leave digital augmentation of artworks in real physical spaces. In this chapter, several AR ideas and solutions are presented with a common theme: each allows users to engage with art or cultural heritage in different ways. The chapter finishes with a presentation of user engagement continuum based on how AR solutions support engagement with artwork consumption and creation, and concludes with implications such AR solution would present.
The research was supported by Slovenian Research Agency ARRS (programme no. P1–0383).
- Angelopoulou A, Economou D, Bouki V, Psarrou A, Jin L, Pritchard C, et al. Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage. In: International conference on mobile wireless middleware, operating systems and applications; 2012. p. 15–22.Google Scholar
- Brosterman N. Inventing kindergarten. 1997.Google Scholar
- Bruner JS, Lufburrow RA. The process of education. Am. J. Phys. 1963; 31(6):468–9 (1st ed). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ043959&site=ehost-live. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Caarls J, Jonker P, Kolstee Y, Rotteveel J, van Eck W. Augmented reality for art, design and cultural heritage—system design and evaluation. EURASIP J Image Video Process [Internet]. 2009; 2009:1–16. http://jivp.eurasipjournals.com/content/2009/1/716160. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Chen D, Yuan L, Liao J, Yu N, Hua G. StyleBank: an explicit representation for neural image style transfer. accept. by CVPR 2017 [Internet]. 2017. http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09210. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Čopič Pucihar K, Kljun M, Coulton P. Using a mobile phone as a 2D virtual tracing tool: static peephole vs. magic lens. In: Kreps D, Fletcher G, Griffiths M, editors. 12th IFIP TC 9 international conference on human choice computers HCC12 2016 [Internet]. Salford, UK: Springer International Publishing; 2016a. p. 277–88. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-44805-3_22. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Čopič Pucihar K, Kljun MM, Coulton P, Pucihar KČ, Kljun MM, Coulton P, et al. Playing with the artworks: engaging with art through an augmented reality game. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems—CHI EA ’16 [Internet]. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2016b. p. 1842–8. http://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/playing-with-the-artworks-engaging-with-art-through-an-augmented-reality-game(3f549016-a1c3-4214-b52e-6bb612aea974).html. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Coulton P, Murphy E, Pucihar KČ, Smith R, Lochrie M. User curated augmented reality art exhibitions. In: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: fun, fast, foundational—NordCHI ’14 [Internet]. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2014a. p. 907–10. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2639189.2670190. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Coulton P, Smith R, Murphy E, Pucihar KČ, Lochrie M. Designing mobile augmented reality art applications: addressing the views of the galleries and the artists. In: Proceedings of the 18th international academic MindTrek conference: media, business, management, content and service—academic MindTrek ’14 [Internet]. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2014b. p. 177–82. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2676467.2676490. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Gombač L, Čopič Pucihar K, Kljun M, Coulton P, Grbac J. 3D Virtual tracing and depth perception problem on mobile AR. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems—CHI EA ’16 [Internet]. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2016. p. 1849–56. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2851581.2892412. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Kljun M, Pucihar KČ. ‘I Was Here’: enabling tourists to leave digital graffiti or marks on historic landmarks. In: Proceedings of the 15th IFIP TC 13 international conference on INTERACT ’15 [Internet]. 2015. p. 490–4. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-22723-8_45. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Kolstee Y, van Eck W. The augmented Van Gogh’s: augmented reality experiences for museum visitors. In: 2011 IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality—arts, media, humanities [Internet]. IEEE; 2011. p. 49–52. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6093656/. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Liao J, Yao Y, Yuan L, Hua G, Kang SB. Visual attribute transfer through deep image analogy. ACM Trans Graph [Internet]. 2017 Jul 20;36(4):1–15. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3072959.3073683. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Lochrie M, Pucihar KC, Coulton P. Time-wARpXplorer : creating a playful experience in an urban time warp. In: Physical and digital in games play seminar. 9th Game Research. Lab Spring Seminar; 2013.Google Scholar
- Miyashita T, Meier P, Tachikawa T, Orlic S, Eble T, Scholz V, et al. An Augmented Reality museum guide. In: 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality [Internet]. IEEE; 2008. p. 103–6. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4637334/. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Papagiannakis G, Schertenleib S, O’Kennedy B, Arevalo-Poizat M, Magnenat-Thalmann N, Stoddart A, et al. Mixing virtual and real scenes in the site of ancient Pompeii. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds [Internet]. 2005 Feb;16(1):11–24. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/cav.53. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- Resnick M. Computer as paintbrush: technology, play, and the creative society. In: Singer D, Michnick Golinkoff R, Hirsh-Pasek K, editors. Play = Learn. How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social growth. 1st ed. New York City, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 192–208.Google Scholar
- Resnick M, Rusk N, Cooke S. The computer clubhouse: Technological fluency in the inner city. In: Schön DA, Sanyal B, Mitchell WJ, editors. High technology. Low-income communities prospects for the positive use of advanced information technology, 1st ed. MIT press; 1999. p. 411.Google Scholar
- Scharfstein B-A. Art without borders: a philosophical exploration of art and humanity. 1st ed. Chicago, IL, USA: The University of Chicago Press; 2009.Google Scholar
- Šimer E. I was here: a system for digital grafitti in public places. University of Primorska; 2016.Google Scholar
- Tillon AB, Marchal I, Houlier P. Mobile augmented reality in the museum: can a lace-like technology take you closer to works of art? In: 2011 IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality—arts, media, humanities [Internet]. IEEE; 2011. p. 41–7. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6093655/. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
- van Eck W, Kolstee Y. The augmented painting: playful interaction with multi-spectral images. In: 2012 IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality—arts, media, humanities [Internet]. IEEE; 2012. p. 65–9. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6483990/. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.