An Instructional Designer’s Story of Designing Gender and Sexuality Courses

Chapter

Abstract

Stories are the most efficient way of storing, retrieving, and conveying information. This chapter tells the story of an instructional designer’s efforts to design an engaging, effective, and high-quality online program for the Study of Gender and Sexuality. The designer created a unique pathway for design success for this program that can be mirrored by other designers. This pathway was created by integrating all the principles of story into the design process. This pathway involves five phases that result in the production of the course story. The five phases are review what has already been done, create a pedagogical framework, capture the student experience, create a seamless course by utilizing a team, and create the story of the course.

Keywords

Instructional design Story Gender and sexuality Online programs Genderful pedagogical framework 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank the core team of the Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality (Molly Merryman, Suzanne Holt, and Lauren Vachon) for their support in acknowledging the expertise an instructional designer can provide in both online course design and in online program development. I am also grateful to Deb Huntsman, Val Kelly, and Bethany Simunich of Kent State University’s Office of Continuing and Distance Education in providing me the opportunity to work on this unique program.

References

  1. DeLarge, C. (2004). Storytelling as a critical success factor in design processes and outcomes. Design Management Review, 15, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2004.tb00175.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fang, B. (2007). A performance-based development model for online faculty. Performance Improvement, 46(5), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gargiulo, T. (2005). The strategic use of stories in organizational communication and learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Gausepohl, K., Winchester, W. W., Arthur, J. D., & Smith-Jackson, T. (2011). Using storytelling to elicit design guidance for medical devices. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 19(2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804611408017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hirumi, A., Sivo, S., & Pounds, K. (2012). Telling stories to enhance teaching and learning: The systematic design, development and testing of two online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 11(2), 125–151. Retrieved from https://www.aace.org/pubs/ijel/.Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, S. P., & Weber, B. R. (2011). Toward a genderful pedagogy and the teaching of masculinity. Journal of Men's Studies, 19(2), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1902.138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kankainen, A., Vaajakallio, K., Kantola, V., & Mattelmäki, T. (2012). Storytelling group: A co-design method for service design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.563794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. King, K. P. (2009). Perspectives on teaching. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 23(3), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.10350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin-Siegler, X., Shaenfiled, D., & Elder, A. D. (2015). Contrasting case instruction can improve self-assessment of writing. Education Technology Research & Development, 63, 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9390-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maloney, S., Moss, A., Keating, J., Kotsanas, G., & Morgan, P. (2013). Sharing teaching and learning resources: Perceptions of a university's faculty members. Medical Education, 47(8), 811–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McEwan, H. (1995). Narrative understanding in the study of teaching. In H. McEwan & K. Egan (Eds.), Narrative in teaching, learning, and research (pp. 166–183). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Murray, J., Byrne, D., & Koenig-Visagie, L. (2013). Teaching gender studies via open and distance learning in South Africa. Distance Education, 34(3), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parrish, P. (2006). Design as storytelling. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 50(4), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-0072-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sametz, R., & Maydoney, A. (2003). Storytelling through design. Design Management Review, 14(4), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2003.tb00347.x.Google Scholar
  17. Schank, R. C. (1991). Tell me a story: A new look at real and artificial intelligence. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  18. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design professional development workbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations