Conservation Issues, Management Initiatives and Challenges for Implementing Khami World Heritage Site Management Plans in Zimbabwe

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Before and after it was nominated on the World Heritage List in 1986, Khami had been affected by various conservation problems, which threatened its outstanding universal value. These conservation issues ranged from collapse of stone walls to lack of resources to immobilise the factors that had continued to overwhelm the site. Although several conservation exercises were made to protect the site, these were carried out without appropriate site management planning. The effect of lack of proper planning for Khami was the recurrence of conservation problems at one of Zimbabwe’s impressive dry stone wall cultural sites. In 1999, a 5-year site management plan was introduced and a number of objectives and strategies were outlined to deal with the management issues that were affecting the site. The Khami management plan was only reviewed in 2013, 13 years after it had expired. This chapter reviews the extent to which the Khami site management plans were implemented since the development of the first plan almost two decades ago. The appraisal indicates that to a certain extent due to inexperience of implementing site management plans, few objectives of the plan were able to be attained.

Keywords

Khami Platforms Stone walls Management plan Steering Committee 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Galbraith, J. S. (1974). Crown and Charter: The early years of the British South African Company. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Hall, R. N., & Neal, W. G. (1902). The ancient ruins of Rhodesia (Monomotapa Emporium). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  3. Hughes, G. (1997). Excavation of the peripheral area settlement of Khami. Zimbabwea, 5(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
  4. Mahachi, G., & Ndoro, W. (1997). The socio-political context of southern African Iron Age studies with special reference to Great Zimbabwe. In G. Pwiti (Ed.), Caves, monuments and texts: Zimbabwean Archaeology Today (pp. 89–104). Uppsala: Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
  5. Makuvaza, S., & Makuvaza, V. (2013). The challenges of managing an archaeological heritage site in a declining economy: The case of Khami World Heritage Site in Zimbabwe. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 15(3–4), 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Matenga, E. (2011). The Soapstone Birds of Great Zimbabwe: Archaeological Heritage, Religion and Politics in Post Colonial Zimbabwe and the Return of Cultural Property. Uppsala: Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
  7. Robinson, K. R. (1959). Khami Ruins. Report on Excavations Undertaken for the Commission for the Preservation of Natural and Historical Monuments and Relics, Southern Rhodesia 1947–1955. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Robinson, K. R. (1949). A Guide to the Khami Nalatale and Dhlodhlo Ruins and other Antiquities near Bulawayo. Bulawayo: HMC.Google Scholar
  9. Rodrigues, J. B., & Mauelshagen, L. (1987). Technical Report on the preservation of Great Zimbabwe and related stone structures. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  10. Sinamai, A. (2013). An un-inherited past: Preserving the Khami World Heritage Site, Zimbabwe. Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Deakin University, Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Thomas, L., & Middleton, J. (2003). Guidelines for management planning of protected areas. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  12. Thorp, C. (1995). Kings, commoners and cattle at great Zimbabwe Tradition Sites. (Museum Memoir, No. 1). Harare: National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
  13. UNESCO. (2013). Managing Cultural World Heritage. (World Heritage Resource Manual). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  14. Walker, P. J., & Dickens, J. G. (1992). An engineering study of dry-stone monuments in Zimbabwe. Department of Civil Engineering, Loughborough University of Technology: Loughborough.Google Scholar
  15. World Heritage Committee. (1986). Report of the Rapporteur (Tenth Session). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of the Built EnvironmentNational University of Science and TechnologyBulawayoZimbabwe
  2. 2.Natural History Museum, Corner Park Street and Leopold Takawira Avenue, Centenary ParkBulawayoZimbabwe

Personalised recommendations