eGov Services’ Consumers in the Process of Innovations’ Diffusion: The Case from St. Petersburg

  • Lyudmila Vidiasova
  • Andrei Chugunov
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 745)


In this paper, we contribute to the research of e-government development from a demand-side. The study was carried out in groups of online services’ consumers, per E. Rogers adopter categories: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. The sociological survey has been conducted with the purpose to reveal differentiation of online services’ users. 450 respondents have been interviewed during the research.

The study concentrated on the following indicators connected with citizens or a demand-side: IT skills and Internet usage, online services usage, awareness of new services, level of satisfaction, and reasons of dissatisfaction with the portals.

The survey detected a frequent Internet usage, growth of citizens’ awareness of online services portal, interest to the interactive part of the portal, and 4 times increase of satisfaction with online services.

The authors proved recommendations for a smoother online services’ adoption by the late majority and laggards groups.


E-government Adoption Diffusion of innovations Online services Demand-side Users’ characteristics 



This work was conducted with support of RFBR grant №. 16-36-60035 “The research of social efficiency of e-participation portals in Russia”.


  1. 1.
    Government 3.0: Opening a New Era of Hope and Happiness for All the People Korean Ministry of Security and Public Administration (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Janssen, M., Shu, W.S.: Transformational government: basics and key issues. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 117–122. ACM Press, New York (2008). doi: 10.1145/1509096.1509120
  3. 3.
    Tolbert, K., Mossberger, K., McNeal, R.: Institutions, policy innovations, and e-government in the American states. Public Adm. Rev. 68(3), 549–563 (2009). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x
  4. 4.
    Chadwick, A., May, C.: Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: e-government in the United States Britain and the European union. Governance 16(2), 271–300 (2003). doi: 10.1111/1468-0491.00216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luna-Reyes, L.F., Gil-Garcia, J.R.: Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-government phenomena. Gov. Inf. Q. 28(11), 329–345 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Sabol, T., Ghoneim, A., Dzupka, P.: E-Government implementation strategies in developed and transition economies: a comparative study. Inf. J. Inf. Manag. 32(1), 66–74 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nielsen, M.: Identifying e-government success factors: an analysis of selected national governance models and their experience in digitizing service delivery. In: Proceedings of EGOSE 2014, pp. 19–26 (2014). doi: 10.1145/2729104.2729111
  8. 8.
    Delopoulos, H.N.: Barriers and opportunities for the adoption of e-governance services. Int. Scholary Sci. Res. Innov. 4(6), 883–886 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heeks, R.: Implementing and Managing Egovernment: An International Text. Sage Publications, London (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thorson, S., Ragland, J.: E-Governance in the Americas and Europe. Final report of the Electronic Governance Research Institute of the University of Seul (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    UN E-Government Survey. E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs; UN Division for Public Administration and Development Management. United Nations (2016).
  12. 12.
    Nour, M.A., AbdelRahman, A.A., Fadlalla, A.: A context-based integrative framework for e-government initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 25(3), 448–461 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alreemy, Z., Chang, V., Walters, R., Wills, G.: Critical success factors (CSFs) for information technology governance (ITG). Gov. Inf. Q. 36(6), 907–916 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.017 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Savage, R.L.: Policy innovativeness as a trait of American states. J. Politics 40(1), 212–219 (1978). doi: 10.2307/2129985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mooney, C.Z., Lee, M.: Legislative morality in the American states: the case of pre-roe abortion regulation reform. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 39(3), 599–627 (1995). doi: 10.2307/2111646 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nagi, E., Hamdan, M.: Computerization and e-government implementation in Jordan: challenges obstacles and successes. Gov. Inf. Q. 26(4), 577–583 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okunoye, A., Bada, O.A., Frolick, M.: IT innovations and e-services delivery: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing countries, Brazil, May 2007 (2007).
  18. 18.
    Arduini, D., Nascia, L., Zanfei, A.: Complementary approaches to the diffusion of innovation: empirical evidence on e-services adoption in Italy. Int. J. E-Services Mob. Appl. (2012). doi: 10.4018/jesma.2012070103.
  19. 19.
    Al Zaabi, H.: Adoption, Diffusion and Use of E-government Services in the Abu Dhabi Police Force. Ph.D. thesis. University of Hertfordshire (2013).;sequence=1
  20. 20.
    Henriksen, H.Z.: The diffusion of e-services in Danish municipalities. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3183, pp. 164–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-30078-6_28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carter, L., Belanger, F.: The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factor. Inf. Syst. J. 15(1), 5–25 (2005). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carter, L., Weerakkody, V.: E-Governemnt adaption: a cultural comparison. Inf. Syst. Frontiers. 10(4), 473–482 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s10796-008-9103-6
  23. 23.
    Vekantesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G, Davis, F.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003).
  24. 24.
    Gil-Garcia, R., Helbig, N., Ferro, E.: Understanding the complexity of electronic government: implications from the digital divide literature. Gov. Inf. Q. 26(1), 89–97 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2008.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dmitrieva, N.E.: Communications in social networks: results of the monitoring of openness of federal bodies of the executive power in social networks. Public Adm. Issue. 2, 123–146 (2015).–2/151702618.html. (In Russian)
  26. 26.
    Reshetnikova, D.S.: Factors of public assessment of civil servants’ performance in providing civil services. Public Adm. Issues. 2, 131–164 (2016).–2/185040575.html. (In Russian)
  27. 27.
    Trahtenberg, A.D.: E-government: a technocratic utopia or a demanded structure. Nauchnyy ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural’skogo otdeleniya RAN 11, 253–269 (2011). (In Russian)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Trakhtenberg, A.D.: E-government and e-services: operationalization of administrative ideology and citizens’ tactics. Sci. Yearbook Inst. Philos. Law Ural Branch Russian Acad. Sci. 16(2), 63–79 (2016). (In Russian)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Evaluation of the Quality of Public Services Provided by the State (Municipal) Institutions. Obzor Instituta regional’nogo razvitiya. Pskov, 25 p. (2014). (In Russian)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mitrofanova, S.V., Mal’kova, V.A.: The state of affairs of multifunctional centers providing public and municipal services in the City of Stavropol. Vestnik Severo-Kavkazskogo federal’nogo universiteta, 2 (47), 270–277 (2015). (In Russian)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Study of the Views of people in the Republic of Tatarstan on Corruption. Report of the Republic of Tatarstan Committee on Social and Economic Monitoring. Kazan (2016). (In Russian)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Abdrahmanova, G.A., Gohberg, L.M., Kovaleva, G.G. et al. (eds.): Information Society: Demand of the population in Russia for Information and Communication Technology. Analytic report (2015). (In Russian)
  33. 33.
    Rogers, E.: Diffusion of Innovations, 5nd edn., 512 p. The Free Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nosonov, A.M.: Theory of diffusion of innovations and innovative development of Russian regions. Pskovskiy regionologicheskiy zhurnal 25, 3–16 (2015). (In Russian)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Deputy Minister of Communications and Mass Communications of Russia Alexander Kozyrev’s Presentation at the Conference TAdviser IT Government DAY.тaтья:Кoнфepeнция_IT_Government_Day_2016/. Accessed 22 Oct 2016. (In Russian)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations