Advertisement

The Role of Commercial Banks and Financial Intermediaries in the New Consensus Macroeconomics (NCM): A Preliminary and Critical Appraisal of Old and New Models

  • Giuseppe Fontana
  • Marco Veronese Passarella
Chapter

Abstract

Giuseppe Fontana and Marco Veronese Passarella in this chapter, entitled, ‘Aggregate Demand, Money and Finance in the New Consensus Macroeconomics: a Critical Appraisal’, critically assess the ‘New Consensus Macroeconomics’ (NCM) theory and its recent developments. Building on the Wicksellian ‘two-interest rates model’, the NCM highlights the role of interest rates in the transmission mechanism of monetary policy, whereas monetary aggregates are treated as residual variables. However, in contrast with Wicksell’s theory, banks and financial institutions are usually neglected in the NCM theory. As a result, the financial instability and recurrent banking crises of modern economies have received little attention in modern macroeconomics. This chapter has three main goals. First, it aims to provide a critical analysis of the original NCM model and some recent developments. Second, it aims to show that few amendments to it are sufficient to account for the financial instability and banking crises of real-world economies. Third, it shows that some important policy-making conclusions logically follow once the role of banks, credit and finance is properly taken on board.

References

  1. Allington, N., & McCombie, J. S. L. (2005). Stock market prices and the conduct of monetary policy under the new consensus monetary policy. In P. Arestis, M. C. Baddeley, & J. S. L. McCombie (Eds.), The new monetary policy. Implications and relevance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  2. Allington, N., McCombie, J. S. L., & Pike, M. (2012). Lessons not learned: From the collapse of long-term capital management to the subprime crisis. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 34(4), 555–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allsopp, C., & Vines, D. (2000). The assessment: Macroeconomic policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(4), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arestis, P. (2007). What is the new consensus in macroeconomics? In P. Arestis (Ed.), Is there a new consensus in macroeconomics? Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Arestis, P. (2009). New consensus macroeconomics: A critical appraisal. In G. Fontana & M. Setterfield (Eds.), Macroeconomic theory and macroeconomic pedagogy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2004). Can monetary policy affect the real economy? European Review of Economics and Finance, 3(3), 9–32.Google Scholar
  7. Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2006). The nature and role of monetary policy when money is endogenous. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(6), 847–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2008). A critical reconsideration of the foundations of monetary policy in the new consensus macroeconomics framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(5), 761–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernanke, B. S. (1981). Bankruptcy, liquidity and recession. American Economic Review Proceedings, 71(2), 155–159.Google Scholar
  10. Bernanke, B. S. (1983). Nonmonetary effects of the financial crisis in the propagation of the great depression. American Economic Review, 73(3), 257–276.Google Scholar
  11. Bernanke, B. S., & Blinder, A. S. (1988). Credit, money, and aggregate demand. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the One-Hundredth Annual Meeting of AEA, 78(2), 435–439.Google Scholar
  12. Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (1989). Agency costs, net worth and business fluctuations. American Economic Review, 79(1), 14–31.Google Scholar
  13. Bernanke, B. S., Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1996). The financial accelerator and flight to quality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernanke, B. S., Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1999). The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. In J. B. Taylor & M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of macroeconomics (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. Borio, C. (2006, September). Monetary and prudential policies at a crossroads? New challenges in the new century (BIS working papers, no. 216).Google Scholar
  16. Borio, C., Furfine, C., & Lowe, P. (2001, March). Procyclicality of the financial system and financial stability: Issues and policy options (BIS working papers, no. 1).Google Scholar
  17. Brancaccio, E., & Fontana, G. (2013). Solvency rule versus Taylor rule. An alternative interpretation of the relation between monetary policy and the economic crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(1), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brunnermeier, M. K., Eisenbach, T. M., & Sannikov, Y. (2012). Macroeconomics with financial frictions: A survey (NBER working paper series, no. 18102).Google Scholar
  19. Buiter, W. (2009, March 3). The unfortunate uselessness of most ‘state of the art’ academic monetary economics. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  20. Calvo, G. (1983). Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(3), 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Caverzasi, E., & Godin, A. (2015). Post-Keynesian stock-flow-consistent modelling: A survey. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(1), 157–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., & Rebelo, S. (2009). When is the government spending multiplier large? (NBER working paper series, no. 15394).Google Scholar
  23. Christiano, L., Motto, R., & Rostagno, M. (2013). Risk shocks (NBER working paper series, no. 18682).Google Scholar
  24. Clarida, R., Galì, J., & Gertler, M. (1999). The science of monetary policy: A new Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1661–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davidson, P. (1978). Money and the real world. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De Grauwe, P. (2010). The scientific foundation of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models. Public Choice, 144(3–4), 413–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Del Negro, M., Giannoni, M. P., & Schorfheide, F. (2014). Inflation in the Great Recession and New Keynesian models. Federal Reserve Bank of New York: Staff Reports, No. 618 (May 2013; revised January 2014).Google Scholar
  28. Dixon, H. D. (2008). New Keynesian macroeconomics. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Dos Santos, C. H. (2006). Keynesian theorising during hard times: Stock-flow consistent models as an unexplored ‘frontier’ of Keynesian macroeconomics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(4), 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eggertsson, G. B., & Krugman, P. (2012). Debt, deleveraging, and the liquidity trap. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1469–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fisher, I. (1933). The debt-deflationary theory of great depressions. Econometrica, 1(4), 333–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Flaschel, P. (2000). Keynes-Marx and Keynes-Wicksell models of monetary growth: A framework for future analysis. Review of Political Economy, 12(4), 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Foley, D., & Farmer, J. D. (2009). The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature, 460, 685–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fontana, G. (2007). Why money matters: Wicksell, Keynes, and the new consensus view on monetary policy. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fontana, G. (2009a). Money, uncertainty and time. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Fontana, G. (2009b). Whither new consensus macroeconomics? The role of government and fiscal policy in modern macroeconomics. In E. Hein, T. Niechoj, & E. Stockhammer (Eds.), Macroeconomic policies on shaky foundations – Whither Mainstream economics? (pp. 187–208). Marburg, Metropolis Verlag. Republished in Wray, L. R. (Ed.). (2013). Theories of money and banking, The international library of critical writings in economics series. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  37. Fontana, G. (2009c). The transmission mechanism of fiscal policy: A critical assessment of current theories and empirical methodologies. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 31(4), 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fontana, G. (2010). The return of Keynesian economics: A contribution in the spirit of John Cornwall’s work. Review of Political Economy, 22(4), 517–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fontana, G., & Palacio-Vera, A. (2002). Monetary policy rules: What are we learning? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 24(4), 547–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fontana, G., & Palacio-Vera, A. (2007). Short-run output stabilisation all that monetary policy can aim for? Metroeconomica, 58(2), 269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fontana, G., & Setterfield, M. (2009). Macroeconomics, endogenous money and the contemporary financial crisis: A teaching model. International Journal of Pluralism and Economic Education, 1(1), 130–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Galì, J., López-Salido, J. D., & Vallés, J. (2004). Rule-of-thumb consumers and the design of interest rate rules. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(4), 739–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gilchrist, S., Ortiz, A., & Zakrajšek, E. (2009, June 4–5). Credit risk and the macroeconomy: Evidence from an estimated DSGE model. Paper prepared for the FRB/JMCB conference ‘Financial Markets and Monetary Policy’, held at the Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  44. Godley, W., & Lavoie, M. (2007). Monetary economics: An integrated approach to credit, money, income production and wealth. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goodfriend, M. (2004). Monetary policy in the new neoclassical synthesis: A primer. Economic Quarterly, 90(3), 21–45.Google Scholar
  46. Goodfriend, M., & King, R. (1997). The new neoclassical synthesis and the role of monetary policy. In B. S. Bernanke & J. Rotemberg (Eds.), NBER macroeconomics annual 1997 (Vol. 12). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Goodhart, C. A. E. (2010). Money, credit and bank behaviour: Need for a new approach. National Institute Economic Review, 214, F73–F82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Greenwald, B. C., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1993). Financial market imperfections and business cycles. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(1), 77–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Inflation targeting monetary and fiscal policies in a two-country stock-flow-consistent model. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(4), 839–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hafstead, M., & Smith, J. (2012). Financial shocks, bank intermediation, and monetary policy in a DSGE Model. Available at: http://www.rff.org/Documents/HafsteadSmith_September2012.pdf
  51. Hanngsen, G. (2006). The transmission mechanism of monetary policy: A critical review, in P. Arestis and M. Sawyer (eds.), A handbook of alternative monetary economics, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  52. Hargreaves-Heap, S. P. (1980). Choosing the wrong natural rate: Accelerating inflation or decelerating employment and growth. Economic Journal, 90(1), 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lavoie, M. (2006). A post-Keynesian amendment to the new consensus on monetary policy. Metroeconomica, 57(2), 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. León-Ledesma, M. A., & Thirlwall, A. P. (2002). The endogeneity of the natural rate of growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(4), 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lucas, R. (2009, August 6). In defence of the dismal science. The Economist.Google Scholar
  56. McCombie, J. S. L., & Negru, I. (2014). On economic paradigms, rhetoric and the micro-foundations of macroeconomics. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 11(1), 53–66.Google Scholar
  57. McCombie, J. S. L., & Pike, M. (2013). No end to the consensus in macroeconomic theory? A methodological inquiry. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 72(2), 497–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Merola, S. (2013). The role of financial frictions during the crisis: And estimated DSGE model (Working paper research, no. 249). National Bank of Belgium.Google Scholar
  59. Meyer, L. H. (2001). Does money matter? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 83(5), 1–15.Google Scholar
  60. Minsky, H. P. (1977). A theory of systematic fragility. In E. I. Altman & A. W. Sametz (Eds.), Financial crises. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  61. Minsky, H. P. (1986). Stabilizing an unstable economy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Nikiforos, M., & Zezza, G. (2017). Stock-flow consistent macroeconomic models: A survey (Levy Economics Institute of Bard College working paper, no. 891). Forthcoming in the Journal of Economic Surveys.Google Scholar
  63. Palacio-Vera, A. (2009). Money wage rigidity, monopoly power and hysteresis. In P. Arestis & M. Sawyer (Eds.), Path dependency and macroeconomics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  64. Roger, S., & Vlcek, J. (2012). Macrofinancial modelling at central banks: Recent developments and future directions (IMF working papers, no. 21).Google Scholar
  65. Romer, D. (2000). Keynesian macroeconomics without the LM curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(2), 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sawyer, M. (2013). Endogenous money, circuits and financialisation. Review of Keynesian Economics, 1(2), 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sawyer, M., & Veronese Passarella, M. (2017). The monetary circuit in the age of financialisation: A stock-flow consistent model with a twofold banking sector. Metroeconomica, 68(2), 321–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Setterfield, M. (2002). Introduction: A dissenter’s view of the development of growth theory and the importance of demand-led growth. In M. Setterfield (Ed.), The economics of demand-led growth: Challenging the supply-side vision of the long run. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Setterfield, M. (2010). Handbook of alternative theories of economic growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smets, F., & Wouters, R. (2003). An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the Euro area. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(5), 1123–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smets, F., & Wouters, R. (2007, February). Shocks and frictions in US business cycles. A Bayesian DSGE approach (Working paper series, no. 722). European Central Bank.Google Scholar
  72. Spaventa, L. (2009). Economists and economics: What does the crisis tell us? Real-World Economics Review, 50(September), 132–142.Google Scholar
  73. Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39(1), 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Taylor, J. B. (1999). Monetary policy rules. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Taylor, J. B. (2000). Teaching modern macroeconomics at the principles level. American Economic Review, 90(2), 90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tovar, C. E. (2009). DSGE models and central banks. Economics: Open Access/Open Assessment E-Journal, 3, 1–30, Available at: http://www.economics-ejournal.org
  77. Van Treeck, T. (2009). A synthetic, stock-flow consistent macroeconomic model of financialisation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(3), 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Veronese Passarella, M. (2014). Financialization and the monetary circuit: A macro-accounting approach. Review of Political Economy, 26(1), 107–127.Google Scholar
  79. Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Woodford, M. (2009). Convergence in macroeconomics: Elements of the new synthesis. American Journal of Economics: Macroeconomics, 1(1), 267–79 (PDF file downloadable from: http://www.columbia.edu/~mw2230/Convergence_AEJ.pdf. April 30th 2013).

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Fontana
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marco Veronese Passarella
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.University of SannioBeneventoItaly

Personalised recommendations