Legal Signs Fascinate pp 9-17 | Cite as
Social Life and Law
Abstract
Social life is life spoken. Speech acts appear of central importance in studying law, as semiotics underline. Law is multidimensional, lawyers speak everyday language and legal language and the meaning of their words is seldom restricted to one level of significance. Is Law’s discourse a different manifestation of linguistic expressiveness? Signs in law reinforce and enrich social life while introducing new dimensions of meaning. This was Greimas’ important contribution to semiotics, as we understand. It was also the reason why Lyotard unfolded his theory of narratives, once confronted with law in post-modernity. Those insights in what Kevelson named the n-dimensionality of meaning and significance in life widens the forces of freedom to create commonness.
Keyword
Speech-act Discourse Freedom Meaning Narration Post-modernityReferences
- Broekman JM and Backer LC (2015) Layered discourses, dynamic semiotics. In: Broekman JM & Backer CL (eds) Signs in law—a source book, Springer, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Broekman JM (2016) Meaning, narrativity, and the real. Springer, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Broekman JM (2017) Verbal and non-verbal in semiotics. In: Semiotica. Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (Issue 216), De Gruyter Mouton, p 19–40Google Scholar
- Greimas AJ and Rastier F (1968) The interaction of semiotic constraints. In: Yale French Studies, Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
- Kevelson R (1988) The law as a system of signs. Plenum Press, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Peirce CS (1873) On the nature of signs. www.commens.org/dictionary/term/sign