Advertisement

Limited Data Modelling Approaches for Engineering Applications

  • Hamid Khayyam
  • Gelayol Golkarnarenji
  • Reza N. Jazar
Chapter

Abstract

In real-world situation, the process of data collection can be challenging and resource intensive, due to being costly, time consuming, and compute intensive. Thus, the amount of data needed to build accurate models is often limited. System identification, making decisions, and prediction based on limited data reduce the production yields, increase the production costs, and decrease the competitiveness of the enterprises; hence, developing an appropriate data model with smaller variance of forecasting error and good accuracy based on these small data sets helps the enterprises to meet the competitive environment. However, the mathematical deterministic approaches that solve problems based on existing theories with few amount of data are not part of this chapter. The chapter aims to review common data modelling techniques for limited data based on heuristic approaches. This review also provides an overview of some of the research to date on data modelling techniques with limited data for various engineering application areas.

References

  1. Abd, A. M., & Abd, S. M. (2017). Modelling the strength of lightweight foamed concrete using support vector machine (SVM). Case Studies in Construction Materials, 6, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, A. B. M. S. (2009). Dynamic and advanced data Mining for Progressing Technological Development: Innovations and systemic approaches: Innovations and systemic approaches. Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  3. Ali, S., & Smith, K. A. (2006). On learning algorithm selection for classification. Applied Soft Computing, 6, 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balabin, R. M., & Lomakina, E. I. (2011). Support vector machine regression (SVR/LS-SVM)—An alternative to neural networks (ANN) for analytical chemistry? Comparison of nonlinear methods on near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data. Analyst, 136, 1703–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, J. D. (2007). Taguchi’s quality engineering handbook. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  6. Bookstein, F. L. (1989). Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 567–585.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24, 123–140.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Burges, C. J. (1998). A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2, 121–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cai, Z.-j., Lu, S., & Zhang, X.-b. (2009). Tourism demand forecasting by support vector regression and genetic algorithm. In Computer science and information technology, 2009. ICCSIT 2009. 2nd IEEE international conference on (pp. 144–146).Google Scholar
  11. Catal, C., Sevim, U., & Diri, B. (2011). Practical development of an eclipse-based software fault prediction tool using naive Bayes algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2347–2353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cawley, G. C., & Talbot, N. L. (2004). Efficient model selection for kernel logistic regression. In Pattern recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on (pp. 439–442).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapelle, O., Vapnik, V., Bousquet, O., & Mukherjee, S. (2002). Choosing multiple parameters for support vector machines. Machine Learning, 46, 131–159.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, N. (2004). Support vector machine in chemistry. World Scientific Pub.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, Z.-S., Zhu, B., He, Y.-L., & Yu, L.-A. (2017). A PSO based virtual sample generation method for small sample sets: Applications to regression datasets. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 59, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cherkassky, V., & Mulier, F. M. (2007). Learning from data: Concepts, theory, and methods. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Cholette, M. E., Borghesani, P., Gialleonardo, E. D., & Braghin, F. (2017). Using support vector machines for the computationally efficient identification of acceptable design parameters in computer-aided engineering applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 81, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chong, E., Han, C., & Park, F. C. (2017). Deep learning networks for stock market analysis and prediction: Methodology, data representations, and case studies. Expert Systems with Applications, 83, 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cosma, G., Brown, D., Archer, M., Khan, M., & Graham Pockley, A. (2017). A survey on computational intelligence approaches for predictive modeling in prostate cancer. Expert Systems with Applications, 70, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crowley, P. H. (1992). Resampling methods for computation-intensive data analysis in ecology and evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23, 405–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Curran-Everett, D. (2012). Explorations in statistics: Permutation methods. Advances in Physiology Education, 36, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Datla, M. V. (2015). Bench marking of classification algorithms: Decision trees and random forests - a case study using R. In 2015 international conference on trends in automation, communications and computing technology (I-TACT-15) (pp. 1–7).Google Scholar
  23. Davim, P. (2012). Computational methods for optimizing manufacturing technology models and techniques. Hershey: Engineering Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davim, J. P. (2015). Design of Experiments in production engineering. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their application (Vol. 1). New York: Cambridge university press.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Dobre, T. G., & Sanchez Marcano, J. G. (2007). Chemical engineering: Modelling, simulation and similitude. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & KGaA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Efron, B. (1992). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. In Breakthroughs in statistics (pp. 569–593). Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An introduction to the bootstrap. CRC press.Google Scholar
  29. Exterkate, P. (2013). Model selection in kernel ridge regression. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 68, 1–16.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fan, X., & Wang, L. (1996). Comparability of jackknife and bootstrap results: An investigation for a case of canonical correlation analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fan, C., Xiao, F., & Zhao, Y. (2017). A short-term building cooling load prediction method using deep learning algorithms. Applied Energy, 195, 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55, 119–139.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Ghiasi, M. M., & Mohammadi, A. H. (n.d.). Application of decision tree learning in modelling CO2 equilibrium absorption in ionic liquids. Journal of Molecular Liquids. Google Scholar
  34. Golkarnarenji, G., Naebe, M., Church, J. S., Badii, K., Bab-Hadiashar, A., Atkiss, S., et al. (2017). Development of a predictive model for study of skin-core phenomenon in stabilization process of PAN precursor. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 49, 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gunn, S. R. (1998) Support vector machines for classification and regression.Google Scholar
  36. Hagan, M. T., & Menhaj, M. B. (1994). Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5, 989–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Han, J., Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining: Concepts and techniques. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  38. Hoffman, J. I. E. (2015). Chapter 37 - resampling statistics. In Biostatistics for medical and biomedical practitioners (pp. 655–661). Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hu, W., Yan, L., Liu, K., & Wang, H. (2016). A short-term traffic flow forecasting method based on the hybrid PSO-SVR. Neural Processing Letters, 43, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huang, C. (2002). Information diffusion techniques and small-sample problem. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 1, 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huang, C., & Moraga, C. (2004). A diffusion-neural-network for learning from small samples. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 35, 137–161.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Hunter, D., Yu, H., Pukish, M. S., III, Kolbusz, J., & Wilamowski, B. M. (2012). Selection of proper neural network sizes and architectures—A comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 8, 228–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ilin, A., & Raiko, T. (2010). Practical approaches to principal component analysis in the presence of missing values. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 1957–2000.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Janssens, D., Wets, G., Brijs, T., Vanhoof, K., Arentze, T., & Timmermans, H. (2006). Integrating Bayesian networks and decision trees in a sequential rule-based transportation model. European Journal of Operational Research, 175, 16–34.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Keerthi, S. S., & Lin, C.-J. (2003). Asymptotic behaviors of support vector machines with Gaussian kernel. Neural Computation, 15, 1667–1689.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Kermani, B. G., Schiffman, S. S., & Nagle, H. T. (2005). Performance of the Levenberg–Marquardt neural network training method in electronic nose applications. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 110, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Khayyam, H., Naebe, M., Bab-Hadiashar, A., Jamshidi, F., Li, Q., Atkiss, S., et al. (2015a). Stochastic optimization models for energy management in carbonization process of carbon fiber production. Applied Energy, 158, 643–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Khayyam, H., Naebe, M., Zabihi, O., Zamani, R., Atkiss, S., & Fox, B. (2015b). Dynamic prediction models and optimization of Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) stabilization processes for production of carbon fiber. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 11, 887–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Khayyam, H., Fakhrhoseini, S. M., Church, J. S., Milani, A. S., Bab-Hadiashar, A., Jazar, R. N., et al. (2017). Predictive modelling and optimization of carbon fiber mechanical properties through high temperature furnace. Applied Thermal Engineering, 125, 1539–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kohavi, R. (n.d.). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection.Google Scholar
  51. Kulkarni, S., & Harman, G. (2011). An elementary introduction to statistical learning theory (Vol. 853). Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Lanouette, R., Thibault, J., & Valade, J. L. (1999). Process modeling with neural networks using small experimental datasets. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 23, 1167–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lawal, I. A. (2011). Predictive modeling of material properties using GMDH-based Abductive networks. In Y. O. Mohammed (Ed.), Modelling symposium (AMS), 2011 fifth Asia (pp. 3–6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521, 436–444., 05/28/print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leopold, E., & Kindermann, J. (2006). Content classification of multimedia documents using partitions of low-level features. JVRB - Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, 3, 2007.Google Scholar
  56. Li, F., & Pengfei, L. (2013). The research survey of system identification method. presented at the 2013 5th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (IHMSC).Google Scholar
  57. Li, D.-C., & Wen, I. H. (2014a). A genetic algorithm-based virtual sample generation technique to improve small data set learning. Neurocomputing, 143, 222–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Li, D.-C., & Wen, I.-H. (2014b). A genetic algorithm-based virtual sample generation technique to improve small data set learning. Neurocomputing, 143, 222–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Li, D.-C., Wu, C., & Chang, F. M. (2006). Using data continualization and expansion to improve small data set learning accuracy for early flexible manufacturing system (FMS) scheduling. International Journal of Production Research, 44, 4491–4509.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. Li, D.-C., Chang, C.-J., Chen, C.-C., & Chen, W.-C. (2012). A grey-based fitting coefficient to build a hybrid forecasting model for small data sets. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36, 5101–5108.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. Liaw, A., & Wiener, M. (n.d.). Classification and regression by randomForest.Google Scholar
  62. Liu, H., Chen, G., Song, G., & Han, T. (2009). Analog circuit fault diagnosis using bagging ensemble method with cross-validation. In Mechatronics and automation, 2009. ICMA 2009. International conference on (pp. 4430–4434).Google Scholar
  63. Lu, Z. J., Xiang, Q., Wu, Y. m., & Gu, J. (2015). Application of support vector machine and genetic algorithm optimization for quality prediction within complex industrial process. In 2015 I.E. 13th international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN) (pp. 98–103).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mao, R., Zhu, H., Zhang, L., & Chen, A. (2006). A new method to assist small data set neural network learning. In Intelligent systems design and applications, 2006. ISDA’06. Sixth international conference on (pp. 17–22).Google Scholar
  65. Montgomery, D. C. (2008). Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Motulsky, H. J., & Ransnas, L. A. (1987). Fitting curves to data using nonlinear regression: A practical and nonmathematical review. The FASEB Journal, 1, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Niyogi, P., Girosi, F., & Poggio, T. (1998). Incorporating prior information in machine learning by creating virtual examples. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86, 2196–2209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pal, M., & Foody, G. M. (2012). Evaluation of SVM, RVM and SMLR for accurate image classification with limited ground data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 5, 1344–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pearl, J. (2014). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  70. Peng, X., Cai, Y., Li, Q., & Wang, K. (2017). Control rod position reconstruction based on K-nearest neighbor method. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 102, 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pham, Q. T. (1998). Dynamic optimization of chemical engineering processes by an evolutionary method. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 22, 1089–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Politis, D. N., Romano, J. P., & Wolf, M. (1999). Subsampling. New York: Springer.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  73. Powell, M. (1965). A method for minimizing a sum of squares of non-linear functions without calculating derivatives. The Computer Journal, 7, 303–307.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. Rasmuson, A., Andersson, B., Olsson, L., & Andersson, R. (2014a). Mathematical modeling in chemical engineering. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rasmuson, A., Andersson, B., Olsson, L., & Andersson, R. (2014b). Mathematical modeling in chemical engineering. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rasmussen, C. E. (2004). Gaussian processes in machine learning. In Advanced lectures on machine learning (pp. 63–71). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ratner, B. (2011). Statistical and machine-learning data mining: Techniques for better predictive modeling and analysis of big data. CRC Press.Google Scholar
  78. Rodrigues, A. E., & Minceva, M. (2005). Modelling and simulation in chemical engineering: Tools for process innovation. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 29, 1167–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rokach, L., & Maimon, O. (2014). Data mining with decision trees: Theory and applications. World scientific.Google Scholar
  80. Ross, S. M. (2009). Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  81. Ruparel, N. H., Shahane, N. M., & Bhamare, D. P. (n.d.). Learning from small data set to build classification model: A survey.Google Scholar
  82. Schapire, R. E. (2003). The boosting approach to machine learning: An overview. In Nonlinear estimation and classification (Vol. 171, p. 149). Springer.Google Scholar
  83. Sharma, A., & Paliwal, K. K. (2015). Linear discriminant analysis for the small sample size problem: An overview. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 6, 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shatovskaya, T., Repka, V., & Good, A. (2006). Application of the Bayesian networks in the informational modeling. In 2006 international conference - modern problems of radio engineering, telecommunications, and computer science (pp. 108–108).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tsai, T.-I., & Li, D.-C. (2008). Utilize bootstrap in small data set learning for pilot run modeling of manufacturing systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 35, 1293–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vapnik, V. N. (1999). An overview of statistical learning theory. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10, 988–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vapnik, V. N., & Vapnik, V. (1998). Statistical learning theory (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  88. Vapnik, V., Golowich, S. E., & Smola, A. (1996). Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation, and signal processing. In Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 9).Google Scholar
  89. Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997). No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Xu, J., Yao, L., & Li, L. (2015). Argumentation based joint learning: A novel ensemble learning approach. PLoS One, 10, e0127281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yesilnacar, E., & Topal, T. (2005). Landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Engineering Geology, 79, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Yoo, K., Shukla, S. K., Ahn, J. J., Oh, K., & Park, J. (2016). Decision tree-based data mining and rule induction for identifying hydrogeological parameters that influence groundwater pollution sensitivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zhang, C.-X., Zhang, J.-S., & Zhang, G.-Y. (2008). An efficient modified boosting method for solving classification problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 214, 381–392.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  94. Zhen, H., Hong, L., Mujiao, F., & Chunbi, X. (2010). Application of statistical learning theory to predict corrosion rate of injecting water pipeline. In Cognitive informatics (ICCI), 2010 9th IEEE international conference on (pp. 132–136).Google Scholar
  95. Zhou, J., & Huang, J. (2012). Support-vector modeling and optimization for microwave filters manufacturing using small data sets. In Industrial informatics (INDIN), 2012 10th IEEE international conference on (pp. 202–207).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamid Khayyam
    • 1
  • Gelayol Golkarnarenji
    • 2
  • Reza N. Jazar
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EngineeringRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Frontier Materials, Carbon NexusDeakin UniversityWaurn PondsAustralia

Personalised recommendations