Multi-objective Cooperative Scheduling for Smart Grids

(Short Paper)
  • Khouloud Salameh
  • Richard Chbeir
  • Haritza Camblong
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10573)


In this work, we propose a multi-objective cooperative scheduling for Smart Grids (SG) consisting of two main modules: (1) the Preference-based Compromise Builder and (2) the Multi-objective Scheduler. The Preference-based Compromise Builder generates the best balance or what we call ‘the compromise’ between the preferences or associations of sellers and buyers that must exchange power simultaneously. Once done, the Multi-objective Scheduler proposes a power schedule for the associations, in order to achieve optimal benefits from different perspectives (e.g., economical by reducing the electricity costs, ecological by minimizing the toxic gas emissions, and operational by reducing the peak load of the SG and its components, and by increasing their comfort). Conducted experiments showed that the proposed algorithms provide convincing results.


Multi-objective optimization Smart Grid Scheduling 


  1. 1.
    Adika, C.O., Wang, L.: Smart charging and appliance scheduling approaches to demand side management. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 57, 232–240 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allcott, H.: Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econ. 95(9), 1082–1095 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fakhrazari, A., Vakilzadian, H., Choobineh, F.F.: Optimal energy scheduling for a smart entity. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 5(6), 2919–2928 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Monteiro, J., et al.: Scheduling techniques to enable power management. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual Design Automation Conference, pp. 349–352. ACM (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saad, W., et al.: Coalitional game theory for cooperative micro-grid distribution networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC), 2011, pp. 1–5. IEEE. (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salameh, k., et al. Microgrid components clustering in a digital ecosystem cooperative framework. In: International Conference on Knowledge Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, vol. 112, pp. 167–176. Elsevier (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Setlhaolo, D., Xia, X., Zhang, J.: Optimal scheduling of household appliances for demand response. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 116, 24–28 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vytelingum, P., et al.: Agent-based micro-storage management for the smart grid. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 39–46 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu, J., Lauri, F., Koukam, A., Hilaire, V.: Scheduling optimization of smart homes based on demand response. In: Chbeir, R., Manolopoulos, Y., Maglogiannis, I., Alhajj, R. (eds.) AIAI 2015. IAICT, vol. 458, pp. 223–236. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23868-5_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gellings, C.W., Chamberlin, J.H.: Demand-side management. In: Goswami, D.Y., Kreith, F. (eds.) Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Handbook, Chap. 15, 2nd edn, pp. 289–310. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohsenian-Rad, A.H., Wong, V.W., Jatskevich, J., Schober, R., Leon-Garcia, A.: Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 1(3), 320–331 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khouloud Salameh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard Chbeir
    • 1
  • Haritza Camblong
    • 2
  1. 1.University Pau & Pays Adour, LIUPPAAngletFrance
  2. 2.University of Basque CountryDonostiaSpain

Personalised recommendations