Advertisement

Impression Material Selection According to the Impression Technique

  • Yilmaz Umut Aslan
  • Yasemin K. ÖzkanEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

While making an impression in an edentulous jaw, the most important problem is the degree of mobility of the soft tissues. This situation changes due to the thickness and hardness of the tissues, the amount of the loading, and the anatomical location. Since supporting areas display some changes while making an impression and the tissue response will be different according to their supporting qualities, impressions cannot be made by applying the same amount of force in each part of the mouth. Over the years, researchers have been improving various impression techniques and materials to provide denture stability and retention. Each material and impression technique has specific advantages and disadvantages. If these techniques are understood in detail, it will be easier to decide which kind of material and technique should be used for the different cases. This chapter sets out to provide information on the classification of the impression techniques and material selection according to the impression technique.

Further Reading

  1. 1.
    Al-Ahmad A, Masri R, Driscoll CF, von Fraunhofer J, Romberg E. Pressure generatedon a simulated mandibular oralanalog by impression materials in customtrays of different design. J Prosthodont. 2006;15:95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albers HF. Impressions. A texbook for technique and material selection. 2nd ed. Santa Rosa: Alto Books; 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Applegate OC. Essentials of removable partial denture prosthesis. 3rd ed. Philadephia: WB Saunders; 1965.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boucher CO, Hickey JC, Zarb GA. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carlsson GE, Ortorp A, Omar R. What is the evidence base for the efficacies of different complete denture impression procedures? A critical review. J Dent. 2013;41:17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chee WW, Donovan TE. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:728–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen SY, Liang WM, Chen FN. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. J Dent. 2004;32:603–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christensen GJ. The challenge to conventional impressions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:347–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cláudia A, Faria L, Cristina R, Rodrigues S, Macedo AP, Mattos MGC, Ribeiro RF. Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials. Braz Oral Res. 2008;22:143–7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daher T, Dermendjian S, Morgano SM. Obtaining maxillomandibular records and definitive impressions in a single visit for a completely edentulous patient with a history of combination syndrome. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:489–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duncan JP, Raghavendra S, Taylor TD. A selective-pressure impression technique for the edentulous maxilla. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:299–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eames WB, Sieweke JC, Wallace SW, Rogers LB. Elastomeric impression materials: effect of bulk on accuracy. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:304–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Federick DR, Caputo A. Comparing the accuracy of reversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128:183–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferracane JL. Materials in dentistry principles and applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott; 2001.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frank RP. Controlling pressures during complete denture impressions. Dent Clin N Am. 1970;14:453–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harwood CL. The evidence base for current practices in prosthodontics. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2008;16:24–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heath R. A study of the morphology of the denture space. Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1970;21:109–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Henry PJ, Harnist DJR. Dimensional stability and accuracy of rubber impression materials. Aust Dent J. 1974;19:162–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hulme C, Yu G, Browne C, O’Dwyer J, Craddock H, Brown S, Gray J, Pavitt SH, Fernandez C, Godfrey M, Dukanovic G, Brunton P, Hyde TP. Cost-effectiveness of silicone and alginate impressions for complete dentures. J Dent. 2014;42:902–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hyde TP, Mc Cord JF. Survey of prosthodontic impression procedures for complete dentures in general dental practice in the UK. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;83:295–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hyde TP. Case report: differential pressure impressions for complete dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004;1:5–8.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hyde TP, Craddock H, Brunton P. The effect of seating velocity on pressure within impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:384–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hyde TP, Craddock HL, Blance A, Brunton PA. Cross-over randomised controlled trial of selective pressure impressions for lower complete dentures. J Dent. 2010;38:853–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hyde TP. A randomised controlled trial of complete denture impression materials. J Dent. 2014;42:895–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johnson GH. Impression materials. In: Craig RG, Powers JM, editors. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2001.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Malachias A, Paranhos HFO, da Silva CHL, VA M×a, Moreto C. Modified functional impression technique for complete dentures. Braz Dent J. 2005;16:135–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martin JW, Jacob RF, King GE. Boxing the altered cast impression for the dentate obturator by using plaster and pumice. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:382–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Masri R, Driscoll CF, Burkhardt J, von Fraunhofer A, Romberg E. Pressure generated on simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs. J Prosthodont. 2002;11:155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McArthur DR. Management of the mucolabial fold when developing impressions for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McGarry TJ, Nimmo A, Skiba JF, Ahlstrom RH, Smith CR, Koumjian JH. Classification system for complete edentulism. The American College of Prosthodontics. J Prosthodont. 1999;8:27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nam J, Raigrodski AJ, Townsend J, Lepe X, Mancl LA. Assessment of preference of mixing techniques and duration of mixing and tray loading for two viscosities of vinyl polysiloxane material. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:12–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Accuracy of alginate, and elastomeric impression materials. Scand J Dent Res. 1989;97:375–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rapuano JÁ, Samanta A, Grieder A. Assuring successful impression making in complete dental construction. Clin Prev Dent. 1987;9:23–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sharry JH. Complete denture prosthodontics. 3rd ed. New York: Hill Book Co; 1974.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Singla S. Complete denture impression techniques: Evidence-based or philosophical. Indian J Dent Res. 2007;18:124–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Starcke EN. A historical review of complete denture impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 1975;91:1037–q041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wegner K, Zenginel M, Buchtaleck J, Rehmann P, Wostmann B. Influence of two functional complete-denture impression techniques on patient satisfaction: dentist-manipulated versus patient-manipulated. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24:540–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weng BX, Khlevnoy V. Pressure control for complete denture impressions. Oral Health. 1997;85:24–7.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Eckert SE, Fenton AH, Jacob RF, Mericske-Stein R. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: complete dentures and implant supported prostheses. 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Dentistry, Department of ProsthodontiscsMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations