Single Complete Dentures

  • Coşkun Yıldız
  • Yasemin K. ÖzkanEmail author


When a complete denture is applied to only one of the jaws in the mouth, it is called a SCD. SCD may be opposing a natural dentition, a fixed partial denture, an existing partial denture, and a present complete denture. During the fabrication of SCD, each of the opposing conditions has to overcome different challenges. Obtaining bilateral balanced occlusion in particular is very difficult to achieve in a SCD opposing natural dentition. In this chapter, each of these situations is explained in detail, and problems encountered in SCD are discussed at the end of this chapter.

Further Reading

  1. Bruce RW. Complete dentures opposing natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1971;26:448–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carl FD, Radi MM. Single maxillary complete denture. Dent Clin N Am. 2004;48:567–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlsson GE. Critical review of some dogmas in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2009;53:3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clough HE, Knodle JM, Leeper SH, Pudwill ML, Taylor DT. A comparison of lingualized occlusion and monoplane occlusion in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:176–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dhiman RK, Roy Chowdhury SK. Midline fractures in single maxillary complete acrylic vs flexible dentures. MJAFI. 2009;65:141–5.Google Scholar
  6. Driscoll CF, Masri RM. Single maxillary complete denture. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48:567–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellinger CW, Rayson JH, Henderson D. Single complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1971;26:4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gehl DH, Dresen OM. Complete denture prosthesis. 4th ed. Philadelphia, London: W. B. Saunders Company; 1958.Google Scholar
  9. Jameson WS. The use of linear occlusion to treat a patient with combination syndrome: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:15–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jameson WS. Use of linear occlusion with fixed restorations opposing a mandibular complete denture: a clinical report. Gen Dent. 2002;51:274–9.Google Scholar
  11. Javid N, Esquivel JF. Polyvinyl siloxane template aids in recontouring natural teeth opposing single dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:325–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelly E. Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial denture opposing a maxillary complete denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;27:140–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kimoto S, Gunji A, Yamakawa A, Ajiro H, Kano K, Shinomiya M, Kawai Y, Kawara M, Kobayashi K. Prospective clinical trial comparing lingualized occlusion to bilateral balanced occlusion in complete dentures: a pilot study. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:103–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Koper A. The maxillary complete denture opposing natural teeth: problems and some solutions. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:704–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lang BR. Complete denture occlusion. Dent Clin Nort Am. 2004;48:641–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Langer Y, Laufer BZ, Cardash HS. Modalities of treatment for the combination syndrome. J Prosthod. 1995;4:76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palmqvist S, Carlsson GE, Owall B. The combination syndrome: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:270–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pravinkumar GP, Rambhau DP. Functionally generated amalgam stops for single complete denture: a case. Report Dent Res J. 2009;6:51–4.Google Scholar
  19. Saunders TR, Gillis RE Jr, Desjardins RP. The maxillary complete denture opposing the mandibular bilateral distal-extension partial denture: treatment considerations. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:124–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmitt SM. Combination syndrome: a treatment approach. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:664–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shen K, Gongloff RK. Prevalence of the ‘combination syndrome’ among denture patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:642–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tan HK. A preparation guide for modifying the mandibular teeth before making a maxillary single complete denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:321–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. White KC, Mueninghoff LA, Ramus DL. Fixed partial dentures opposing compete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:483–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williamson RA, Williamson AE, Bowley J, Toothaker R. Maximizing mandibular prosthesis stability utilizing linear occlusion, occlusal plane selection, and centric recording. J Prosthodont. 2004;13:55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Winkler S, Monasky GE, Narvekar R. The edentulous mandible opposing maxillary natural teeth treatment considerations. Dent Clin North Am. 1990;34:143–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wyatt CCL. The effect of prosthodontic treatment on alveolar bone loss: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:362–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Dentistry, Department of ProsthodonticsMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations