Advertisement

Imaging Principles in Pediatric Oncology

  • Georgia Ch. Papaioannou
  • Kieran McHugh
Chapter

Abstract

Pediatric oncology presents challenges to imaging due to several differences that the pediatric population possesses in their physiology and pathology. As is widely accepted, children merit special considerations.

References

  1. 1.
    McCarville MB (2008) New frontiers in pediatric oncologic imaging. Cancer Imaging 8:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weiner MA (2000) Principles and practice of pediatric oncology. In: Bast RC Jr, Kufe DW, Pollock RE et al (eds) Holland-Frei cancer medicine, 5th edn. BC Decker, Hamilton. chapter 137AGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Sites-Types/childhoodGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Papaioannou G, Sebire NJ, McHugh K (2009) Imaging of the unusual pediatric ‘blastomas. Cancer Imaging 9:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papaioannou G, McHugh K (2005) Neuroblastoma in childhood: review and radiological findings. Cancer Imaging 5:116–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Monclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF, Brisse HJ, Cecchetto G, Holmes K, Kaneko M, London WB, Matthay KK, Nuchtern JG, von Schweinitz D, Simon T, Cohn SL, Pearson ADJ (2009) The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG). Staging system: an INRG task force report. J Clin Oncol 27(2):298–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kawada T (2012) Trend in the number of registrations for neuroblastoma in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42:357–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goske MJ (2008) The image gently campaign: working together to change practice. Am J Roentgenol 190:273–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    States LJ, Meyer JS (2011) Imaging modalities in pediatric oncology. Radiol Clin North Am 49:579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Voss SD, Reaman GH, Kaste SC, Slovis TL (2009) The ALARA concept in pediatric oncology. Pediatr Radiol 39:1142–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    www.image-gently.orgGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McHugh K, Disini L (2011) Commentary: for the children’s sake, avoid non-contrast CT. Cancer Imaging 11:16–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Panigrahy A, Blüml S (2009) Neuroimaging of pediatric brain tumors: from basic to advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). J Child Neurol 24:1343–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lowe LH, Isuani BH, Heller RM et al (2000) Pediatric renal masses: Wilms tumor and beyond. Radiographics 20:1585–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roebuck D, Aronson D, Clapuyt P et al (2007) 2005 PRETEXT: a revised staging system for primary malignant liver tumours of childhood developed by the SIOPEL group. Pediatr Radiol 37:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miller TT (2008) Bone tumors and tumorlike conditions: analysis with conventional radiography. Radiology 246:662–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brisse H, Ollivier L, Edeline V et al (2004) Imaging of malignant tumours of the long bones in children: monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative assessment. Pediatr Radiol 34:595–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hawkins DS, Conrad EU III, Butrynski JE et al (2009) [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography response is associated with outcome for extremity osteosarcoma in children and young adults. Cancer 115:3519–3525CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georgia Ch. Papaioannou
    • 1
  • Kieran McHugh
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric Radiology, Mitera Maternity and Children’s HospitalHygeia GroupAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyGreat Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenLondonUK

Personalised recommendations