Advertisement

Metaphors of Creativity

  • Tony VealeEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 665)

Abstract

What is creativity? This question is far more likely to elicit an anecdote, an aphorism or a metaphor than it is a literal definition. Creativity is an elusive phenomenon to study, made all the more vexing by our fundamental inability to pin it down in formal terms.

References

  1. 1.
    Lees, R.B., Chomsky, N.: Syntactic structures. Language 33(3 Part 1), 375–408 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1980)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson, M.: The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Imagination, Reason, and Meaning. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martin, J.H.: A Computational Model of Metaphor Interpretation. Academic Press Professional Inc., Cambridge (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veale, T., Keane, M.T.: Conceptual scaffolding: a spatially founded meaning representation for metaphor comprehension. Comput. Intell. 8(3), 494–519 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barnden, J.A.: Belief in metaphor: taking commonsense psychology seriously1. Comput. Intell. 8(3), 520–552 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gibbs, R.W.: The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Veale, T.: Exploding the Creativity Myth: The Computational Foundations of Linguistic Creativity. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Veale, T., Shutova, E., Klebanov, B.B.: Metaphor: a computational perspective. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. 9(1), 1–160 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koestler, A.: The Act of Creation. Macmillan, New York (1964)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fauconnier, G., Turner, M.: Conceptual integration networks. Cogn. Sci. 22(2), 133–187 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fauconnier, G., Turner, M.: The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heaton, J.M.: Wittgenstein and Psychoanalysis. Totem Books, Flint (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Veale, T., O’Donoghue, D., Keane, M.T.: Computation and blending. Cogn. Linguist. 11(3/4), 253–282 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Newell, A., Shaw, J., Simon, H.A.: Preliminary description of general problem solving program-I (GPS-I). WP7, Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, PA (1957)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuhn, T.S., Hawkins, D.: The structure of scientific revolutions. Am. J. Phys. 31(7), 554–555 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: GPS, a program that simulates human thought. In: Feigenbaum, E.A., Feldman, J. (eds.) Computers and Thought, pp. 279–293. R. Oldenbourg KG (1963)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Newell, A., Simon, H.A., et al.: Human Problem Solving, vol. 104. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boden, M.A.: The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boden, M.A.: Computer Models of Creativity, pp. 351–372. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perkins, D.N.: Archimedes’ Bathtub: The Art and Logic of Breakthrough Thinking. WW Norton & Company, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Langacker, R.: Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hofstadter, D.R.: Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. Basic Books, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Langacker, R.W.: Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites, vol. 1. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto (1987)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fineman, M., Fineman, M.B.: The Nature of Visual Illusion. Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lakoff, G.: Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Concepts Reveal about the Mind. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sowa, J.F., et al.: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations, vol. 13. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gendler, T.S.: Thought Experiment: On the Powers and Limits of Imaginary Cases. Garland Publishing, London (2000)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gendler, T.S.: Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 49(3), 397–424 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mach, E.: The science of mechanics, trans. TJ McCormack, new introduction by K. Menger, 6th edn. Open Court, La Salle (1960)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Attardo, S., Hempelmann, C.F., Di Maio, S.: Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: modeling incongruities and their resolutions. Humor: Int. J. Humor Res. 15(1), 3–46 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Veale, T.: Incongruity in humor: root cause or epiphenomenon? Humor: Int. J. Humor Res. 17(4), 419–428 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ritchie, G.: Developing the incongruity-resolution theory. Technical report, Edinburgh Research Archive, Scotland (1999)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hofstadter, D., Gabora, L.: Synopsis of the workshop on humor and cognition. Humor: Int. J. Humor Res. 2–4, 417–440 (1989)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guilford, J.P.: The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M.: Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    von Wright, G.H.: Wittgenstein on certainty. In: Problems in the Theory of Knowledge/Problèmes de la Théorie de la Connaissance, pp. 47–60. Springer (1972)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Malcolm, N.: Wittgenstein’s philosophical investigations. Philos. Rev. 63(4), 530–559 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations