Advertisement

Intersection Graphs of Rays and Grounded Segments

  • Jean Cardinal
  • Stefan Felsner
  • Tillmann MiltzowEmail author
  • Casey Tompkins
  • Birgit Vogtenhuber
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10520)

Abstract

We consider several classes of intersection graphs of line segments in the plane and prove new equality and separation results between those classes. In particular, we show that:
  • intersection graphs of grounded segments and intersection graphs of downward rays form the same graph class,

  • not every intersection graph of rays is an intersection graph of downward rays, and

  • not every outer segment graph is an intersection graph of rays.

The first result answers an open problem posed by Cabello and Jejčič. The third result confirms a conjecture by Cabello. We thereby completely elucidate the remaining open questions on the containment relations between these classes of segment graphs. We further characterize the complexity of the recognition problems for the classes of outer segment, grounded segment, and ray intersection graphs. We prove that these recognition problems are complete for the existential theory of the reals. This holds even if a 1-string realization is given as additional input.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was initiated during the Order & Geometry Workshop organized by Piotr Micek and the second author at the Gultowy Palace near Poznan, Poland, on September 14–17, 2016. We thank the organizers and attendees, who contributed to an excellent work atmosphere. Some of the problems tackled in this paper were brought to our attention during the workshop by Michal Lason. The first author also thanks Sergio Cabello for insightful discussions on these topics.

References

  1. 1.
    Benzer, S.: On the topology of the genetic fine structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 45(11), 1607–1620 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cabello, S., Cardinal, J., Langerman, S.: The clique problem in ray intersection graphs. Discrete Comput. Geom. 50(3), 771–783 (2013)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cabello, S., Jejčič, M.: Refining the hierarchies of classes of geometric intersection graphs. Electron. J. Combin. 24(1), P1.33 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Canny, J.F.: Some algebraic and geometric computations in PSPACE. In: Proceedings of STOC, pp. 460–467. ACM (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cardinal, J.: Computational geometry column 62. ACM SIGACT News 46(4), 69–78 (2015)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chalopin, J., Gonçalves, D.: Every planar graph is the intersection graph of segments in the plane: extended abstract. In: Proceedings of STOC, pp. 631–638. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chaplick, S., Felsner, S., Hoffmann, U., Wiechert, V.: Grid intersection graphs and order dimension. arXiv:1512.02482 (2015)
  8. 8.
    Chaplick, S., Hell, P., Otachi, Y., Saitoh, T., Uehara, R.: Intersection dimension of bipartite graphs. In: Gopal, T.V., Agrawal, M., Li, A., Cooper, S.B. (eds.) TAMC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8402, pp. 323–340. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-06089-7_23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ehrlich, G., Even, S., Tarjan, R.E.: Intersection graphs of curves in the plane. J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 21(1), 8–20 (1976)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Felsner, S.: The order dimension of planar maps revisited. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 28(3), 1093–1101 (2014)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keil, J.M., Mitchell, J.S.B., Pradhan, D., Vatshelle, M.: An algorithm for the maximum weight independent set problem on outerstring graphs. Comput. Geom. 60, 19–25 (2017)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kostochka, A.V., Nešetřil, J.: Coloring relatives of intervals on the plane, I: chromatic number versus girth. Eur. J. Comb. 19(1), 103–110 (1998)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kostochka, A.V., Nešetřil, J.: Colouring relatives of intervals on the plane, II: intervals and rays in two directions. Eur. J. Comb. 23(1), 37–41 (2002)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kratochvíl, J.: String graphs. I. The number of critical nonstring graphs is infinite. J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 52(1), 53–66 (1991)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kratochvíl, J.: String graphs. II. Recognizing string graphs is NP-hard. J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 52(1), 67–78 (1991)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kratochvíl, J., Matoušek, J.: String graphs requiring exponential representations. J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 53(1), 1–4 (1991)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kratochvíl, J., Matoušek, J.: Intersection graphs of segments. J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 62(2), 289–315 (1994)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matoušek, J.: Lectures on Discrete Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 212. Springer, New York (2002). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0039-7 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matoušek, J.: Intersection graphs of segments and \(\exists \mathbb{R}\). arXiv:1406.2636 (2014)
  20. 20.
    McKee, T.A., McMorris, F.: Topics in Intersection Graph Theory. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mustaţă, I., Nishikawa, K., Takaoka, A., Tayu, S., Ueno, S.: On orthogonal ray trees. Discrete Appl. Math. 201, 201–212 (2016)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naji, W.: Reconnaissance des graphes de cordes. Discrete Math. 54(3), 329–337 (1985)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rok, A., Walczak, B.: Outerstring graphs are \(\chi \)-bounded. In: Proceedings of SoCG, pp. 136–143. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schaefer, M.: Complexity of some geometric and topological problems. In: Eppstein, D., Gansner, E.R. (eds.) GD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5849, pp. 334–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-11805-0_32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schaefer, M., Sedgwick, E., Štefankovič, D.: Recognizing string graphs in NP. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 67(2), 365–380 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shor, P.W.: Stretchability of pseudolines is NP-hard. In: Applied Geometry and Discrete Mathematics. DIMACS Series in DMTCS, vol. 4, pp. 531–554. AMS (1990)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shrestha, A.M.S., Tayu, S., Ueno, S.: On orthogonal ray graphs. Discrete Appl. Math. 158(15), 1650–1659 (2010)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sinden, F.W.: Topology of thin film RC circuits. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 45(9), 1639–1662 (1966)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Soto, J.A., Telha, C.: Jump number of two-directional orthogonal ray graphs. In: Günlük, O., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) IPCO 2011. LNCS, vol. 6655, pp. 389–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20807-2_31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wessel, W., Pöschel, R.: On circle graphs. In: Sachs, H. (ed.) Graphs, Hypergraphs and Applications, pp. 207–210. Teubner (1985)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Cardinal
    • 1
  • Stefan Felsner
    • 2
  • Tillmann Miltzow
    • 3
    Email author
  • Casey Tompkins
    • 4
  • Birgit Vogtenhuber
    • 5
  1. 1.Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Institut für MathematikTechnische Universität Berlin (TU)BerlinGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Computer Science and ControlHungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA SZTAKI)BudapestHungary
  4. 4.Alfréd Rényi Institute of MathematicsHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary
  5. 5.Institute of Software TechnologyGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations