Skip to main content

The Documentary Designer: A List of Propositions for Interactive Documentary Practice Online

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Digital Media and Documentary
  • 389 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter proposes that interactive documentary needs to utilise the affordances of the network in a way similar to other online media. To help with this, documentary can use design methods to identify the affordances of the network to then connect media into a web of relations. Design in this context is also a process that responds to problems that arise through change, and this ability to negotiate change is key in the fast-paced environment of the Internet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bas, Berke, and Florian Thalhofer. Planet Galata: A Bridge in Istanbul, 2010, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David, and Kristin Thompson. Film Art: An Introduction. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachet, A., and A. Szalat. Gaza Sderot, 2008, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Kevin M. “Do Story Agents Use Rocking Chairs? The Theory and Implementation of One Model for Computational Narrative.” Proceedings of Multimedia ’96. Boston: ACM Press, 1996. 317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Richard. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8.2 (1992): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, Bill. Sketching User Experiences. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossover Labs. “Korsakow – Not the Linear-Causal Way of Thinking.” Crossover Labs, January 1, 2015, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. Yellowlees. The End of Books or Books Without End?: Reading Interactive Narratives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, Jon, and Mandy Rose. “We’re Happy and We Know It: Documentary: Data: Montage.” Studies in Documentary Film 6.2 (2012): 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dressen, Arnaud, et al. Klynt. Computer Program. Paris, France: Honkytonk Films, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufresne, David, and Philippe Brault. Prison Valley. 2010, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, Michael. “Beyond Skin Deep: Exploring the Contribution of Communication Design Within Interaction Design Projects.” RMIT University, M.Des. Thesis, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudenzi, Sandra. The Living Documentary: From Representing Reality to Co-creating Reality in Digital Interactive Documentary. Goldsmiths, University of London, PhD Thesis, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, Lucy. “Rethinking Design Thinking: Part 1.” Design and Culture 3.3 (2011): 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, Lev. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, Lev. “The Practice of Everyday (Media) Life.” Video Vortex Reader: Responses to Youtube. Ed. Geert Lovink and Sabine Niederer. Amsterdam: XS4ALL, 2008. 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrin, William. “Studying Me-Dia: The Problem of Method in a Post-broadcast Age.” Media Studies 2.0, 2010, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Adrian. “Softvideography: Digital Video as Postliterate Practice.” Small Tech: The Culture of Digital Tools. Ed. Byron Hawk, David M. Rieder and Ollie Oviedo. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008a. 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Adrian. “Programmatic Statements for a Facetted Videography.” Video Vortex Reader: Responses to Youtube. Ed. Geert Lovink and Sabine Niederer. Amsterdam: XS4ALL, 2008b. 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozilla. Popcorn Maker. Computer Program. Mozilla, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Janet Horowitz. Inventing the Medium: Principles of Interaction Design as a Cultural Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Kate. “Modes of Interactivity: Analysing a Webdoc.” Media, Culture and Society 34.2 (2012): 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Jakob. “Writing Style for Print vs. Web.” Nielsen Norman Group, 2008, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, Donald. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Book, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, Donald. “Affordance, Conventions and Design (Part 2).” Don Norman: Designing for People, 1999, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flynn, Siobhan. “Documentary’s Metamorphic Form: Webdoc, Interactive, Transmedia, Participatory and Beyond.” Studies in Documentary Film 6.2 (2012): 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Carl R. Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, Peter. Design Thinking. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Marie-Laure. “Beyond Myth and Metaphor: Narrative in Digital Media.” Poetics Today 23.4 (2002): 581–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Marie-Laure. Narrative Across Media: The Languages of Storytelling. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, Donald. The Reflective Practitioner. London: Ashgate, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soar, Matt. “Making (with) the Korsakow System: Database Documentaries as Articulation and Assemblage.” New Documentary Ecologies. Ed. Kate Nash, Craig Hight and Catherine Summerhayes. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 154–173.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Soar, Matt, and Florian Thalhofer, “Release Notes.” Korsakow: The Next Level Story, 2005, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thackara, John. In the Bubble: Designing a Complex World. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalhofer, Florian. Korsakow. Computer Program, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Keen, S. (2018). The Documentary Designer: A List of Propositions for Interactive Documentary Practice Online. In: Miles, A. (eds) Digital Media and Documentary. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68643-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics