This paper presents the EU H2020 project Smart Mature Resilience, which takes advantage of the fact that many cities are committed to become increasingly resilient and have ongoing processes for urban resilience. Smart Mature Resilience develops resilience management guidelines based on a Resilience Maturity Model that engages a growing number of stakeholders and multi-level governance in order for cities to become vertebrae for society’s resilience backbone. In a dual approach, employing a systematic literature review of international resilience implementation approaches alongside group processes with experts, the Smart Mature Resilience project has developed a preliminary resilience maturity model consisting of five stages Starting, Moderate, Advanced, Robust and verTebrate (SMART) and a Systemic Risk Assessment Questionnaire. The SMART Resilience Maturity Model suggests two principal processes for the transition to resilience maturity: (1) A process of increasing engagement and collaboration with new stakeholder types, from local, to regional, to national to European in a growing resilience backbone, and (2) a process of quality improvement of policies for transitioning from a Safety-I to a Safety-II perspective (from risk assessment & mitigation to adaption to future surprises as conditions evolve).
KeywordsResilience Management guidelines Critical infrastructures Natural disasters Social dynamics Maturity model Risk systemicity
The Smart Mature Resilience research project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 653569.
- 1.UNISDR, UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR), pp. 1–30 (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.Walker, G., et al.: Risk governance and natural hazards. CapHaZ-Net FP7 Project (2010)Google Scholar
- 7.Costa, M.M., et al.: Governance indicators for (Un)succcesful MSPs (2013)Google Scholar
- 8.Renn, O.: Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Nat. Hazards 48(2), 313 (2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Crowe, P., Foley, K.: The Turas project: integrating social-ecological resilience and urban planning: TURAS FP7 project, pp. 1–15 (2013)Google Scholar
- 10.CGG: Our Global Neighbourhood. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
- 11.McLean, L., Guha-Sapir, D.: Developing a resilience framework. ENHANCE FP7 Project, vol. 2015 (2013)Google Scholar
- 12.Vennix, J.A.M.: Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning using System Dynamics. Wiley, Chichester (1996)Google Scholar
- 15.Williams, T.M., Ackermann, F., Eden, C.: Project risk: systemicity, cause mapping and a scenario approach, In: Kahkonen, K., Artto, K. (eds) Managing Risks in Projects, E and FN Spon, London, UK (1997)Google Scholar
- 20.Ackermann, F., Eden, C.: Making Strategy: Mapping Out Strategic Success. Sage, London (2011)Google Scholar