• Lucy Nicholas
  • Christine Agius


The conclusion draws together the key themes covered in the book, highlighting key aspects of masculinism. It summaries the case study chapters and indicates how masculinism works across the various cases investigated. Finally, it points to some ways in which to conceptualise alternatives to masculinist framings and logics.


Masculinism Gender Liberalism Intersectionality Feminist ethics Queer ethics 


  1. Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2002. Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others. American Anthropologist 104 (3): 783–790.Google Scholar
  2. Antrobus, Harcourt, and Gita Sen. 2010. Power, Respect and Solidarity: In Conversation with Peggy Antrobus and Gita Sen.
  3. Arvin, Maile, Eve Tuck, and Angie Morrill. 2013. Decolonizing Feminism: Challenging Connections between Settler Colonialism and Heteropatriarchy. Feminist Formations 25 (1): 8–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bach, Michael. 1993. Uncovering the Institutionalised Masculine: Notes for a Sociology of Masculinity. In Men and Masculinities: A Critical Anthology, ed. Tony Haddad. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, Drucilla K. 1998. Dualisms, Discourse, and Development. Hypatia 13 (3): 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Beauvoir, Simone. 1976. The Ethics of Ambiguity (Trans. B. Frechtman). New York: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
  7. Benhabib, Seyla. 1985. The Generalized and the Concrete Other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Controversy and Feminist Theory. PRAXIS International 4: 402–424.Google Scholar
  8. Bergman Rosamond, Annika. 2013. Protection Beyond Borders: Gender Cosmopolitanism and Co-Constitutive Obligation. Global Society 27 (3): 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilge, Sirma. 2013. Intersectionality Undone: Saving Intersectionality from Feminist. Intersectionality Studies. Du Bois Review 10 (2): 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Britzman, Deborah P. 1995. Is there a Queer Pedagogy? Or, Stop Reading Straight. Educational Theory 45 (2): 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler, Judith. 2007. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Däumer, Elizabeth. 1992. Queer Ethics; or, The Challenge of Bisexuality to Lesbian Ethics. Hypatia 7 (4): 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fallis, Greg. 2017. Seriously, the Guy has a Point. April 14.
  14. Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. The End of History? The National Interest 16: 3–18.Google Scholar
  15. Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. The Guardian. 2017. Urinating Dog Joins Fearless Girl and Charging Bull. New York Statue Row, May 30.
  17. Haberman, Clyde. 2012. The Bull Tied to Occupy Wall Street. The New York Times, September 17.
  18. Hooper, Charlotte. 2012. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hutchings, Kimberly. 2007. Feminist Ethics and Political Violence. International Politics 44 (1): 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lam, Bourree. 2017. Why People are So Upset about Wall Street’s ‘Fearless Girl’. The Atlantic, April 14.
  21. Merle, Renae. 2017. Fearless Girl has Turned Charging Bull into Symbol of Male Chauvinism: Sculptor. Sydney Morning Herald, April 21.
  22. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2013. Transnational Feminist Crossings: On Neoliberalism and Radical Critique. Signs 38 (4): 967–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muñoz, J.E. 2009. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  24. New York Post. 2017. Pissed-off Artist Adds Statue of Urinating Dog Next to ‘Fearless Girl’. 29 May.
  25. Nicholas, Lucy. 2014. Queer Post-Gender Ethics: The Shape of Selves to Come. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parashar, Swati. 2012. Where are the Feminists to Defend Indian Women? The Drum, December 28.
  27. ———. 2016. Is Transnational Feminist Solidarity Possible? In Handbook on Gender in World Politics, ed. Jill Steans and Daniela Tepe-Belfrage, 118–126. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rai, Shirin M. 2008. The Gender Politics of Development: Essays in Hope and Despair. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  29. Rivera, Joshua. 2017. Wonder Woman: DC’s Best Film Yet, and Its Most Important. GQ, May 31.
  30. Sabaratnam, Meera. 2013. Avatars of Eurocentrism in the Critique of the Liberal Peace. Security Dialogue 44 (3): 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, Andrea. 2010. Queer Theory and Native Studies: The Heteronormativity of Settler Colonialism. GLQ 16 (1–2): 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams, Zoe. 2017. Why Wonder Woman is a Masterpiece of Subversive Feminism. The Guardian, June 5.
  33. Witt, Lara. 2017. Wonder Woman Is Your Zionist. White Feminist Hero, June 2.
  34. Ziyad, Hari. 2017. The Success of Wonder Woman Proves Liberals are OK with Imperialism as Long as Its Led by a (White) Woman. Afropunk, June 6.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucy Nicholas
    • 1
  • Christine Agius
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologySwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Politics and HistorySwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations