Advertisement

Funology 2 pp 241-254 | Cite as

From Evaluation to Crits and Conversation

  • Mark Blythe
  • Jonathan Hook
  • Jo Briggs
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

Soon after the launch of the iPhone the British artist and printmaker David Hockney began sending his friends pictures he had made using painting and drawing apps. One of these friends was the writer and art critic Martin Gayford and in 2009 he received an iPhone drawing of a sunrise over the East Yorkshire town of Bridlington (Thames & Hudson 2007). The file on Hockney’s iPhone was identical to the one that he sent to Gayford which prompted him to ask—where was the original? Hockney sent many images to his friends and they in turn could share them until London was awash with “original Hockneys”. While Hockney’s limited edition etchings and lithographs attract high prices, this new method of production and dissemination challenged the notion of a limited edition “print run” because digital files can be reproduced with no diminution of quality at virtually no cost. These kinds of reflection led to a project called “Digital Originals” where we conducted several studies of practicing artists and developed an app called Repentir.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the EPSRC grant Digital Originals EP/I032088/1.

References

  1. Bardzell J (2009) Interaction criticism and aesthetics. In: Proceedings of CHI’09. ACM, New York, pp 2357–2366Google Scholar
  2. Bardzell S (2010) Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In: Proceedings of CHI’10. ACM, New York, pp 1301–1310Google Scholar
  3. Blythe M, Robinson J, Frohlich D (2008) Interaction design and the critics: what to make of the “weegie”. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: building bridges (NordiCHI’08)Google Scholar
  4. Blythe M, Bardzell J, Bardzell S, Blackwell A (2008) Critical issues in interaction design. In: HCI 2008, culture, creativity and interaction design. Liverpool, 1–5 Sept 2008Google Scholar
  5. Blythe M, McCarthy J, Light A, Bardzell S, Wright P, Bardzell J, Blackwell A (2010) Critical dialogue: interaction, experience and cultural theory. In: Proceedings of CHI’10 Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 10–15 April 2010. CHI EA’10. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Blythe M, Reid J, Wright P, Geelhoed E (2006) Interdisciplinary criticism: analysing the experience of Riot! A location sensitive digital narrative. Behav Inf Technol 25(2):127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boehner K, DePaula R, Dourish P, Sengers P (2005) Affect: from information to interaction. In: Proceedings of critical computing: between sense and sensibility. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 59–68Google Scholar
  8. Briggs J, Blythe M (2012) No oil painting: digital originals and slow prints. In: Slow technology: critical reflection and future directions. Workshop paper in conjunction with DIS’12Google Scholar
  9. Chesterton GK (1928) Heretics. John LaneGoogle Scholar
  10. Cockton G (2008) Putting value into E-valuation. In: Law E, Hvannberg E, Cockton G (eds) Maturing usability. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobbins M (2009) Urban design and people. WileyGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman B (2006) Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Zhang P, Galleta D (eds) Human computer interaction in management information systems. Armonk, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaver W (2007) Cultural commentators: non-native interpretations as resources for polyphonic assessment. IJHCS 65(4):292–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaver W (2012) What should we expect from research through design. In: CHI 2012, pp 937–946Google Scholar
  15. Gayford M (2007) A bigger message: conversations with David Hockney. Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenberg S, Buxton B (2008) Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 111–120Google Scholar
  17. Hook J, Briggs J, Blythe M, Walsh N, Olivier P (2013). Repentir: digital exploration beneath the surface of an oil painting. In: CHI ’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (CHI EA ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 2947–2950Google Scholar
  18. Kaye J, Sengers P (2007) The evolution of evaluation. In: CHI 2007. ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Kusunoki D, Sarcevic A (2012) Applying participatory design theory to designing evaluation methods. In: Proceedings of CHI 2012. ACM, pp 1895–1900Google Scholar
  20. Lindsay S, Jackson D, Ladha C, Ladha K, Brittain K, Olivier P (2012) Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia. In: Proceedings of CHI 12. ACM, pp 521–530Google Scholar
  21. Marx K (1906) Capital. Charles H. Kerr & Company, Chicago, pp 337–338Google Scholar
  22. Morozov E (2013) To save everything click here: technology, solutionism and the urge to fix problems that don’t exist. Penguin booksGoogle Scholar
  23. Vermeeren APOS, Law EL-C, Roto V, Obrist M, Hoonhout J, Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila K (2010) User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs. In: Proceedings of Nordichi 2010, Reykjavik, Iceland, 16–20 Oct 2010Google Scholar
  24. Zimmerman J, Forlizzi J (2008) The role of design artifacts in design theory construction. Human Computer Interaction Institute. Paper 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Žižek (2009) The parallax view. MIT Press. Cambridge Massachusetts, London EnglandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
  2. 2.University of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations