Ireland?s Authoritative Geospatial Linked Data

  • Christophe Debruyne
  • Alan Meehan
  • Éamonn Clinton
  • Lorraine McNerney
  • Atul Nautiyal
  • Peter Lavin
  • Declan O’Sullivan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10588)

Abstract

Data.geohive.ie aims to provide an authoritative service for serving Ireland?s national geospatial data as Linked Data. The service currently provides information on Irish administrative boundaries and the boundaries used for the Irish 2011 census. The service is designed to support two use cases: serving boundary data of geographic features at various level of detail and capturing the evolution of administrative boundaries. In this paper, we report on the development of the service and elaborate on some of the informed decisions concerned with the URI strategy and use of named graphs for the support of aforementioned use cases ? relating those with similar initiatives. While clear insights on how the data is being used are still being gathered, we provide examples of how and where this geospatial Linked Data dataset is used.

Keywords

Geospatial linked data Ordnance survey Ireland 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The ADAPT Centre for Digital Content Technology is funded under the SFI Research Centres Programme (Grant 13/RC/2106) and is co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund.

References

  1. 1.
    Prime2: Data concepts and data model overview. Technical report, Ordnance Survey Ireland (2014). http://www.osi.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Prime2-V-2.pdf
  2. 2.
    Atemezing, G.A., Abadie, N., Troncy, R., Bucher, B.: Publishing reference geodata on the web: opportunities and challenges for IGN France. In: Kyzirakos, K., Grütter, R., Kolas, D., Perry, M., Compton, M., Janowicz, K., Taylor, K. (eds.) Joint Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on the Foundations, Technologies and Applications of the Geospatial Web, TC 2014, and 7th International Workshop on Semantic Sensor Networks, SSN 2014, Co-located with 13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2014), Riva del Garda, October 20, 2014. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1401, pp. 9?20. CEUR-WS.org (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Battle, R., Kolas, D.: Enabling the geospatial semantic web with Parliament and GeoSPARQL. Semant. Web 3(4), 355?370 (2012). doi:10.3233/SW-2012-0065 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Debruyne, C., Meehan, A., Clinton, E., McNerney, L., Nautiyal, A., Lavin, P., O’Sullivan, D.: GeoHive Administrative Boundaries Dataset. figshare (2017). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5235961
  5. 5.
    Debruyne, C., Clinton, E., McNerney, L., Nautiyal, A., O’Sullivan, D.: Serving Ireland?s geospatial information as linked data. In: Kawamura, T., Paulheim, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the ISWC 2016 Posters & Demonstrations Track co-located with 15th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2016), Kobe, October 19, 2016. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1690. CEUR-WS.org (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Debruyne, C., Clinton, E., O’Sullivan, D.: Client-side processing of GeoSPARQL functions with triple pattern fragments. In: Auer, S., Berners-Lee, T., Bizer, C., Capadisli, S., Heath, T., Janowicz, K., Lehmann, J. (eds.) Workshop on Linked Data on the Web co-located with 26th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2017). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Debruyne, C., McGlinn, K., McNerney, L., O’Sullivan, D.: A lightweight approach to explore, enrich and use data with a geospatial dimension with semantic web technologies. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Workshop on Managing and Mining Enriched Geo-Spatial Data. pp. 1:1?1:6. GeoRich 2017, ACM, New York (2017). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3080546.3080548
  8. 8.
    Goodwin, J., Dolbear, C., Hart, G.: Geographical linked data: the administrative geography of Great Britain on the semantic web. Trans. GIS 12(s1), 19?30 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haklay, M.: How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environ. planning B: Planning des. 37(4), 682?703 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lecue, F., Tamma, V.: ISWC 2017 resources track: author and reviewer instructions (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4679152
  11. 11.
    Lee, D., Cyganiak, R., Decker, S.: Open data Ireland: best practice handbook. Technical report, Insight Centre for Data Analytics, NUI Galway (2014). http://per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/Best-Practice-Handbook.pdf
  12. 12.
    Lee, D., Cyganiak, R., Decker, S.: Open data Ireland: open data Publication Handbook. Technical report, Insight Centre for Data Analytics, NUI Galway (2014). http://per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/Open-Data-Publication-Handbook.pdf
  13. 13.
    McGuinness, D., Lebo, T., Sahoo, S.: PROV-O: the PROV ontology. W3C Recommendation, W3C (Apr 2013). http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/
  14. 14.
    Mooney, P., Corcoran, P., Winstanley, A.C.: Towards quality metrics for OpenStreetMap. In: Agrawal, D., Zhang, P., Abbadi, A.E., Mokbel, M.F. (eds.) 18th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, ACM-GIS 2010, November 3?5, 2010, San Jose, Proceedings. pp. 514?517. ACM (2010). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1869790.1869875
  15. 15.
    Overbeek, H., van den Brink, L.: Towards a national URI-Strategy for linked data of the Dutch public sector. Technical report, Kennis- en Exploitatiecentrum Officiële Overheidspublicaties & Geonovum (2013). http://www.pilod.nl/w/images/a/aa/D1-2013-09-19_Towards_a_NL_URI_Strategy.pdf
  16. 16.
    Patroumpas, K., Georgomanolis, N., Stratiotis, T., Alexakis, M., Athanasiou, S.: Exposing INSPIRE on the semantic web. J. Web Sem. 35, 53?62 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.websem.2015.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perry, M., Herring, J.: GeoSPARQL - A geographic query language for RDF data, OGC (2012). http://opengeospatial.org/standards/geosparql
  18. 18.
    Shadbolt, N., O’Hara, K., Berners-Lee, T., Gibbins, N., Glaser, H., Hall, W., schraefel, M.C.: Linked open government data: lessons from data.gov.uk. IEEE Intell. Syst. 27(3), 16?24 (2012). doi:10.1109/MIS.2012.23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    van den Brink, L., Janssen, P., Quak, W., Stoter, J.: Linking spatial data: semi-automated conversion of geo-information models and GML data to RDF. Int. J. Spat. Data Infrastruct. Res. 9, 59?85 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Verborgh, R., Vander Sande, M., Hartig, O., Van Herwegen, J., De Vocht, L., De Meester, B., Haesendonck, G., Colpaert, P.: Triple pattern fragments: a low-cost knowledge graph interface for the web. J. Web Sem. 37?38, 184?206 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.websem.2016.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meehan, A., McNerney, L., Clinton, E., O’Sullivan, D., Nautiyal, A., Lavin, P.: GeoHive Administrative Boundaries Dataset. Figshare (2017). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5235961

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christophe Debruyne
    • 1
  • Alan Meehan
    • 1
  • Éamonn Clinton
    • 2
  • Lorraine McNerney
    • 2
  • Atul Nautiyal
    • 1
  • Peter Lavin
    • 1
  • Declan O’Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.ADAPT Centre, Trinity College DublinDublin 2Ireland
  2. 2.Ordnance Survey IrelandDublin 8Ireland

Personalised recommendations