The Role of Vegetation in Determining Dune Morphology, Exposure to Sea-Level Rise, and Storm-Induced Coastal Hazards: A U.S. Pacific Northwest Perspective

  • Peter RuggieroEmail author
  • Sally Hacker
  • Eric Seabloom
  • Phoebe Zarnetske


Coastal foredunes are often the “first line of defense” for backshore infrastructure from the hazards of erosion and flooding, and they are key components of coastal ecosystems. The shape and growth characteristics of coastal foredunes, typically characterized by simple morphometrics such as dune toe and crest elevations, and dune volume, are a product of both physical and biological forces. By influencing foredune shape, these forces ultimately affect the exposure of human populations and ecosystems to extreme storms and sea-level rise. In this chapter, we synthesize field surveys and a suite of interdisciplinary laboratory, mesocosm, and computer modeling experiments that examine the relative role of vegetation in determining dune geomorphology in the U.S. Pacific Northwest (PNW). We focus on how dunes of different shapes result in variable levels of exposure to coastal hazards. Results suggest that PNW dune shape is primarily a function of sediment supply and the geographic distribution of two species of non-native beach grasses (Ammophila arenaria and A. breviligulata). Over recent decades, A. breviligulata (American beachgrass) has increased its dominance over A. arenaria (European beachgrass) on dunes where it was originally planted and has actively spread to new sites formerly dominated by A. arenaria. A species-specific biophysical feedback occurs between sand deposition and beach grass growth habit, resulting in distinctly different dune geomorphologies in locations dominated by these different grass species. The dense, vertical growth habit of A. arenaria allows it to capture more sand, produce more vertical tillers, and build taller, narrower dunes, while the less dense, lateral growth habit of A. breviligulata is more suited for building shorter but wider dunes. The species-specific feedbacks, along with invasion dynamics, have a first order effect on the region’s exposure to coastal hazards, in the present day and under a range of climate change and invasion scenarios. These findings draw on insights from geomorphology, ecology, and coastal engineering to assess coastal barrier vulnerability in light of global change.


Beach grasses Ammophila arenaria Ammophila breviligulata Coastal barriers Ecomorphodynamics Foredunes Morphodynamics Oregon Pacific Northwest Sea-level rise Washington 



The field, mesocosm, and laboratory observations described in this manuscript are the result of the hard work by many individuals from Oregon State University, the Evergreen State College, the Washington Department of Ecology, the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, and the U.S. Geological Survey. Funding for the work synthesized in this paper was provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA/NCER 83383601-0), Oregon Sea Grant (NA060AR4170010, NA10OAR4170010), the National Science Foundation (IGERT NSF award 0333257), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA award NA15OAR4310243), the Northwest Association of Networked Ocean Observing Systems (NANOOS), the O.H. Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory, and a Mamie Markham Research Grant (Hatfield Marine Science Center). This manuscript benefited greatly from thorough reviews of Evan B. Goldstein and an anonymous reviewer.


  1. Allan JC, Komar PD (2000) Are ocean wave heights increasing in the eastern North Pacific? EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 81(47):561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan JC, Komar PD (2002) Extreme storms on the Pacific Northwest coast during the 1997–98 El Niño and 1998 La Niña. J Coast Res 18(1):175–193Google Scholar
  3. Allan JC, Komar PD (2006) Climate controls on US West Coast erosion processes. J Coast Res 22:511–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atwater BF (1996) Coastal evidence for great earthquakes in western Washington. In: Rogers AM, Walsh TJ, Kockelman WJ, Priest GR (eds), Assessing earthquake hazards and reducing risk in the Pacific Northwest, vol 1. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1560, pp 77–90Google Scholar
  5. Barbier E, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch E, Stier AD, Silliman B (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81:169–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter RWG (1990) Coastal environments: an introduction to the physical, ecological and cultural systems of coastlines. Academic Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper WS (1958) Coastal sand dunes of Oregon and Washington. Mem Geol Soc Am 72:169Google Scholar
  8. Duran O, Moore L (2013) Vegetation controls on the maximum size of coastal dunes. PNAS 110(43):17217–17222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duran O, Moore LJ (2015) Bistability of barrier islands induced by biophysical interactions. Nat Clim Chang 5(2):158–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duarte CM, Losada IJ, Hendriks IE, Mazarrasa I, Marba N (2013) The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 3.
  11. Elko N, Sallenger AH, Guy K, Stockdon H, Morgan K (2002) Barrier island elevations relevant to potential storm impacts: 1. Techniques. Open File Report 02-287, U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg, FL, 6pGoogle Scholar
  12. Elko N, Brodie K, Stockdon H, Nordstrom K, Houser C, McKenna K, Moore L, Rosati J, Ruggiero P, Thuman R, Walker I (2016) Dune management challenges on developed coasts. Shore Beach 84(1):1–14Google Scholar
  13. Feagin RA, Sherman DJ et al (2005) Coastal erosion, global sea-level rise, and the loss of sand dune plant habitats. Front Ecol Environ 3(7):359–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guerry AD, Ruckelshaus MH, Arkema K, Bernhardt JR, Guannel G, Kim CK, Marsik M, Papenfus M, Toft JE, Verutes G, Wood SA, Beck M, Chan F, Chan KMA, Gelfenbaum G, Gold BD, Halpern BS, Labiosa WB, Lester SE, Levin PS, McField M, Pinsky ML, Plummer M, Polasky S, Ruggiero P, Sutherland DA, Tallis H, Day A, Spencer J (2012) Modeling benefits from nature; using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 8(1–2):107–121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gutierrez JL et al (2012). Physical ecosystem engineers and the functioning of estuaries and coasts. In: Heip CHR et al (eds) Functioning of estuaries and coastal ecosystems, vol 7. In: Wolanski E, McLusky D (series eds) The treatise on estuarine and coastal science. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  16. Hacker S, Zarnetske P, Seabloom E, Ruggiero P, Mull J, Gerrity S, Jones C (2012) Subtle differences in two non-native congeneric beach grasses significantly affect their colonization, spread, and impact. Oikos 121(1):138–148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hesp P (1989) A review of the biological and geomorphological processes in the initiation and development of incipient foredunes. Proc R Soc Edinb 96:191–202Google Scholar
  18. Houser C, Ellis J (2013) Beach and dune interaction. In: Shroder J (Editor in Chief), Sherman DJ (ed) Treatise on geomorphology. Coastal geomorphology, vol 10. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 267–288Google Scholar
  19. Inman DL, Nordstrom CE (1971) On the tectonic and morphologic classification of coasts. J Geol 79(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contributions of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaminsky GK, Ruggiero P, Buijsman MC, Gelfenbaum G (2010) Historical evolution of the Columbia River littoral cell. Mar Geol.
  22. Kaminsky GM, Ruggiero P, Gelfenbaum G (1998) Monitoring coastal change in southwest Washington and Northwest Oregon during the 1997/98 El Niño. Shore Beach 66(3):42–51Google Scholar
  23. Kim C-K, Toft JE, Papenfus M, Verutes G, Guerry AD et al (2012) Catching the right wave: evaluating wave energy resources and potential compatibility with existing marine and coastal uses. PLoS One 7(11):e47598. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Komar PD (1986) The 1982–83 El Niño and erosion on the coast of Oregon. Shore Beach 54(2):3–12Google Scholar
  25. Komar PD, Allan JC, Ruggiero P (2009) Ocean wave climates—Trends and variations due to Earth’s changing climate. In: Kim YC (ed) Handbook of coastal and ocean engineering. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 971–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Komar PD, Allan JC, Ruggiero P (2011) Sea level variations along the US Pacific Northwest coast: tectonic and climate controls. J Coast Res 5(27):808–823. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Komar PD, Allan JC, Ruggiero P (2013) Chapter 21: U.S. Pacific Northwest Coastal Hazards: Tectonic and Climate Controls. In: Finkl C (ed) Coastal hazards, pp 587–674Google Scholar
  28. Lipiec E (2015) Assessing coastal community adaptation scenarios in the face of climate change: a Tillamook county, Oregon, example. M.S. thesis, Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  29. Martinez ML, Psuty NP (2004) Coastal dunes: ecology and conservation. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Méndez FJ, Menéndez M, Luceño A, Losada IJ (2006) Estimation of the long-term variability of extreme significant wave height using a time-dependent peak over threshold (POT) model. J Geophys Res Oceans 111(C7):C07024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Menéndez M, Méndez FJ, Losada IJ, Graham NE (2008) Variability of extreme wave heights in the northeast Pacific ocean based on buoy measurements. Geophys Res Lett 35(22):L22607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mills A (2015) Exploring the impacts of climate and management on coastal community vulnerability through alternative future scenarios. M.S. thesis, Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore LJ, Ruggiero P, List JH (2006) Comparing mean high water and high water line shorelines: should proxy-datum offsets be incorporated in shoreline change analysis? J Coast Res 22(4):894–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moore L, Duran O, Ruggiero P (2016) Vegetation control allows autocyclic formation of multiple dunes on prograding coasts. Geology 4(7):559–462. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mull J, Ruggiero P (2014) Estimating storm-induced dune erosion and overtopping along U.S. West Coast beaches. J Coast Res 30(6):1173–1187. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murray AB, Knaapen MAF, Tal M, Kirwan ML (2008) Biomorphodynamics: physical-biological feedbacks that shape landscapes. Water Resour Res 44:W11301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nordstrom KF, Jackson NL, Kraus NC, Kana TW, Bearce R, Bocamazo LM, Young DR, DeButts HA (2011) Enhancing geomorphic and biologic functions and values on backshores and dunes of developed shores: a review of opportunities and constraints. Environ Conserv 38:288–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. NRC (2012) Sea level rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: past, present, and future, s.l.: Committee on Seal Rise in California, Oregon, and Washington: Board of Earth Sciences and Resources; Ocean Studies Board; Division on Earth and Life StudiesGoogle Scholar
  39. Psuty NP (1992) Spatial variation in coastal foredune development. Proceedings of the 3rd European dune congress, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp 3–13Google Scholar
  40. Pye K, Tsoar H (1990) Aeolian Sand and Sand Dunes. Unwin Hyman, London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Revell DL, Komar PD, Sallenger AH (2002) An application of LIDAR to analyses of El Niño erosion in the Netarts Littoral Cell, Oregon. J Coast Res 18(4):792–801Google Scholar
  42. Ruggiero P, Komar PD, McDougal WG, Marra JJ, Beach RA (2001) Wave runup, extreme water levels and the erosion of properties backing beaches. J Coast Res 17(2):407–419Google Scholar
  43. Ruggiero P, Kaminsky GM, Gelfenbaum G, Voigt B (2005) Seasonal to interannual morphodynamics along a high-energy dissipative littoral cell. J Coast Res 21(3):553–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruggiero P, List JH (2009) Improving accuracy and statistical reliability of shoreline position and change rate estimates. J Coast Res 25(5):1069–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruggiero P, Komar PD, Allan JC (2010) Increasing wave heights and extreme-value projections: the wave climate of the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Coast Eng 57:539–552. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ruggiero P, Mull J, Zarnetske P, Hacker S, Seabloom E (2011) Interannual to decadal foredune evolution. In: Proceedings of coastal sediments 2011. ASCE, Miami, FL, pp 698–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruggiero P (2013) Is the intensifying wave climate of the U.S. Pacific Northwest increasing flooding and erosion risk faster than sea level rise? J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng.
  48. Ruggiero P, Kratzmann MA, Himmelstoss EG, Reid D, Allan J, Kaminsky G (2013) National assessment of shoreline change: historical shoreline change along the Pacific Northwest Coast. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012-1007, 62pGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruggiero P, Kaminsky G, Gelfenbaum G, Cohn N (2016) Morphodynamics of prograding beaches: a synthesis of seasonal- to century-scale observations of the Columbia River littoral cell. Mar Geol 376:51–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sallenger AH (2000) Storm impact scale for barrier islands. J Coast Res 16:890–895Google Scholar
  51. Seabloom E, Ruggiero P, Hacker S, Mull J, Zarnetske P (2013) Invasive grasses, climate change, and flood risk in coastal ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol.
  52. Seabloom EW, Wiedemann AM (1994) Distribution and effects of Ammophila breviligulata Fern. (American Beach Grass) on the foredunes of the Washington Coast. J Coast Res 10:178–188Google Scholar
  53. Seymour RJ (2011) Evidence for changes to the northeast Pacific wave climate. J Coast Res 27(1):194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Short A, Hesp P (1982) Wave, beach and dune interactions in Southeastern Australia. Mar Geol 48:259–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stockdon HF, Holman RA, Howd PA, Sallenger AH Jr (2006) Empirical parameterization of setup, swash, and runup. Coast Eng 53(7):573–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stockdon HF, Sallenger AH, Holman RA, Howd PA (2007) A simple model for the spatially-variable coastal response to hurricanes. Mar Geol 238:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stockdon HF, Doran KS, Sallenger AH (2009) Extraction of LiDAR-based dune crest elevations for use in examining the vulnerability to beaches during inundation during hurricanes. J Coast Res 53:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wiedemann AM, Pickart AJ (2004) Temperate zone coastal dunes. In: Martinez M, Psuty N (eds) Coastal dunes: ecology and conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–65Google Scholar
  59. Wright LD, Short AD (1983) Morphodynamics of beaches and surf zones in Australia. In: Komar PD (ed) CRC handbook of coastal processes and erosion. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 35–64Google Scholar
  60. Young IR, Ziegler S, Babanin AV (2011) Global trends in wind speed and wave height. Science 332(6028):451–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zarnetske PL, Seabloom EW, Hacker SD (2010) Non-target effects of invasive species management: beach grass, birds, and bulldozers in coastal dunes. Ecosphere 1:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zarnetske PL, Ruggiero P, Seabloom EW, Hacker SD (2015) Coastal foredune evolution: the relative influence of vegetation and sand supply in the US Pacific Northwest. J R Soc Interface 12(106):20150017. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zarnetske PL, Hacker SD, Seabloom EW, Ruggiero P, Killian JR, Maddux TB, Cox D (2012) Biophysical feedback mediates effects of invasive grasses on coastal dune shape. Ecology 93(6):1439–1450. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Ruggiero
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sally Hacker
    • 2
  • Eric Seabloom
    • 3
  • Phoebe Zarnetske
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Integrative BiologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and BehaviorUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  4. 4.Department of Forestry, Fisheries and WildlifeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  5. 5.Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior ProgramMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations