Skip to main content

An Optimal Configuration of an Aircraft with High Lift Configuration Using Surrogate Models and Optimisation Under Uncertainties

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (WCSMO 2017)

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Nowadays many simulations are computationally expensive, which is disadvantageous if one is interested in the quantification of uncertainties, parameter studies or in finding an optimal or robust design. Therefore often so-called surrogate models are designed, which are a good approximation of the original model but computationally less expensive.

In this paper we first look for an approximation method to design a surrogate model for the simulation of a civil aircraft with active high lift configuration. Such aircrafts have the advantage that only small runways for take-off and landing are necessary. A first result, presented in this paper, is a configuration of the aircraft, where the direct operating costs (DOCs) are minimised. For the optimisation process seven parameters are chosen, for example the Mach number in the cruise flight and the area of the wing. In a second step we define 28 uncertain parameters and repeat the optimisation process including these uncertain parameters to derive a robust configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bailey, T., Gatrell, A.: Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christakos, G.: Random Field Models in Earth Sciences. Academic Press, San Diego (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Elishakoff, I.: Whys and Hows in Uncertainty Modelling-Probability, Fuzziness, and Anti-optimization. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grigoriu, M.: Stochastic Calculus-Applications in Science and Engineering. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen, L.U., Heinze, W., Horst, P.: Blended wing body structures in multidisciplinary pre-design. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 36, 93–106 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heinze, W., Osterheld, C.M., Horst, P.: Multidisziplinäres Flugzeugentwurfsverfahren PrADO: Programmentwurf und Anwendung im Rahmen von Flugzeug-Konzeptstudien. Jahrbuch der DGLR-Jahrestagung 2001, Hamburg, p. 12 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hooker, J., Zeune, C., Agelastos, A.: Over wing nacelle installations for improved energy efficiency. In: 31st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Conference Paper, San Diego, CA, USA, 24–27 June 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaynes, E.: Probability Theory, the Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Karniadakis, G.E., Sue, C.-H., Xiu, D., Lucor, D., Schwab, C., Tudor, R.A.: Generalized polynomial chaos solution for differential equations with random input. Technical report 2005–1, SAM, ETH Zürich, Zürich (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy, M., O’Hagan, A.: Bayesian calibration of computer models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 63, 425–464 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Knio, O.M., Maître, O.P.L.: Uncertainty propagation in CFD using polynomial chaos decomposition. Fluid Dyn. Res. 38, 616–640 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Matthies, H.G.: Uncertainty quantification with stochastic finite elements. In: Stein, E., de Borst, R., Hughes, T.R.J. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics. Wiley, Chichester (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matthies, H.G., Rang, J.: Variational formulation for interpolation and approximation methods. Informatik-bericht, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig (2017, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Natke, H., Ben-Haim, Y. (eds.): Uncertainty: Models and Measures. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Hagan, A., Buck, C., Daneshkhah, A., Eiser, J., Garthwaite, P., Jenkinson, D., Oakley, J., Rakow, T.: Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Expert Probabilities. Wiley, Chichester (2006)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Papoulis, A.: Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill, Singapore (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Poggio, T., Girosi, F.: A theory of networks for approximation and learning. Technical report, MIT (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roy, C.J., Oberkampf, W.L.: A complete framework for verification, validation and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing. AIAA-Paper, 2010-124 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Specht, D.F.: A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2(6), 568–576 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wall, M.: GAlib: a C++ library of genetic algorithm components. Documentation revision b, MIT (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Werner-Westphal, C., Heinze, W., Horst, P.: Multidisciplinary integrated preliminary design applied to unconventional aircraft congurations. J. Aircr. 45(2), 581–590 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zell, A.: Simulation Neuronaler Netze. Addison-Wesley, Bonn (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support has been provided by the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) in the framework of the SFB (Sonderforschungsbereich) 880.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Rang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rang, J., Heinze, W. (2018). An Optimal Configuration of an Aircraft with High Lift Configuration Using Surrogate Models and Optimisation Under Uncertainties. In: Schumacher, A., Vietor, T., Fiebig, S., Bletzinger, KU., Maute, K. (eds) Advances in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. WCSMO 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67988-4_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67988-4_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67987-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67988-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics