From Agriscience to Agribusiness pp 13-39 | Cite as
The Shifting Structure of Agricultural R&D: Worldwide Investment Patterns and Payoffs
- 972 Downloads
Abstract
The future path and pace of agricultural productivity growth areinextricably intertwined with investments in food and agricultural research and development (R&D). Looking back over half a century of evidence, we find that the lay of the global food and agricultural R&D land is changing, with indications that we are in the midst of an historic transition. The more notable trends are as follows: (1) for the first time in modern history (in purchasing power parity, PPP, terms), the middle-income countries now outspend the rich countries in terms of public-sector investments in food and agricultural R&D; (2) the shifting public shares reflect a continuing decline in the rate of growth of food and agricultural R&D spending by the rich countries, along with a generally sustained and substantial growth in spending by the middle-income countries (especially China, India, and Brazil); (3) in PPP terms, China now spends more than the United States on both public- and private-sector food and agricultural R&D; (4) the global share of food and agricultural R&D being conducted by the private sector has increased, especially in the high- and rapidly growing middle-income countries; and (5) the low-income countries are losing ground and account for an exceptionally small share of global spending. The mean and median values of the reported rates of return to food and agricultural R&D based on the IRR are high and remain so, with no signs of a diminution in the payoffs to more recent (compared with earlier) investments in R&D. But the available evidence on the returns to food and agricultural R&D is not fully representative of the institutional (i.e., public versus private), locational, or commodity orientation of the research and the agricultural sector itself.
References
- Alston, J.M., M.A. Andersen, J.S. James, and P.G. Pardey. 2011. The Economic Returns to U.S. Public Agricultural Research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93 (5): 1257–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alston, J.M., M.C. Marra, P.G. Pardey, and T.J. Wyatt. 2000. A Meta-Analysis of Rates of Return to Agricultural R&D: Ex Pede Herculem? Washington D.C.: IFPRI Research Report No 557.Google Scholar
- Alston, J.M., G.W. Norton, and P.G. Pardey. 1995. Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Alston, J.M., and P.G. Pardey. 2016. Antipodean Agricultural and Resource Economics at 60: Agricultural Innovation. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 60 (4): 554–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Andersen, M.A., and W. Song. 2013. The Economic impact of public agricultural research and development in the United States. Agricultural Economics 44 (3): 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Angelo, C. 2016. Brazil’s Scientists Fight Funding Freeze: Proposed Law Could Restrict Research Spending for 20 Years. Nature 439: 480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barry, P., and P. Ellinger. 2011. Financial Management in Agriculture. Seventh ed. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Bailey, M.J. 1959. Formal Criteria for Investment Decisions. Journal of Political Economy 67 (5): 476–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dehmer, S.P., P.G. Pardey, and J.M. Beddow. 2017 (in process). Reshuffling the Global R&D Deck, 1980–2013. InSTePP Working Paper. St Paul: International Science and Technology Practice and Policy (InSTePP) center.Google Scholar
- Echeverría, R.G. 1990. Assessing the Impact of Agricultural Research. In Methods for Diagnosing Research System Constraints and Assessing the Impact of Agricultural Research, ed. R.G. Echeverria. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR).Google Scholar
- Evenson, R.E. 2001. Economic Impacts of Agricultural Research and Extension. In Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Volume 1A. Agricultural Production, ed. B. Gardner and G. Rausser. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Evenson, R.E., P.E. Waggoner, and V.W. Ruttan. September 1979. Economic Benefits from Research: An example from Agriculture. Science 205 (4411): 1101–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fabiosa, J. 2012. Globalization and Trends in World Food Consumption. In The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Food Consumption and Policy, ed. J. Lusk, J. Roosen, and J.F. Shogren. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- FAO. 2015. FAOSTAT database. Food and Agricultural Commodities Production/Commodities by Regions, Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available at: http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/rankings/commodities_by_regions/E. Accessed January 1, 2015.
- ———. 2016. FAOSTAT Country classifications. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org/site/371/default.aspx. Accessed May 2016.
- Gardner, B.L. 1992. How the Data we Make Can Unmake Us: Annals of Factology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74 (5): 1066–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Griliches, Z. 1958. Research Costs and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related Innovations. Journal of Political Economy 66 (5): 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hirshleifer, J. 1958. On the Theory of Optimal Investment Decision. Journal of Political Economy 66 (4): 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hurley, T.M., X. Rao, and P.G. Pardey. 2014a. Re-examining the Reported Rates of Return to Food and Agricultural Research and Development. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96: 1492–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ———. 2014b. AJAE Appendix for Reexamining the Reported Rates of Return to Food and Agricultural Research and Development. Supporting online material, May 3, 2014. Available at http://ajae.oxfordjournals.org/content/early2014/05/31/ajae.aau047/suppl/DC1
- ———. 2017. Re-examining the Reported Rates of Return to Food and Agricultural Research and Development—Reply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96 (5): 1492–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- OECD. (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2007. Revised Field of Science and Technology (FOS) Classification in the Frascati Manual. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/38235147.pdf
- ——— (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2002. Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
- Oehmke, J. 2017. Re-examining the Reported Rates of Return to Food and Agricultural Research and Development: Comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 99 (3): 818–826.Google Scholar
- Plastina, A.S., and L.E. Fulginiti. 2012. Rates of Return to Public Agricultural Research in 48 US States. Journal of Productivity Analysis 37: 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pardey, P.G., C. Chan-Kang, J.M. Beddow, and S.M. Dehmer. 2016. InSTePP International Innovation Accounts: Research and Development Spending, Version 3.5 (Food and Agricultural R&D Series)-Documentation. St. Paul, MN: International Science and Technology Practice and Policy (InSTePP). Available at http://www.instepp.umn.edu/products/documentation-instepp-international-innovation-accounts-research-and-development-spending
- Rao, X., T.M. Hurley, and P.G. Pardey. 2017a. Are Agricultural R&D Returns Declining and Development Dependent?” InSTePP and Department of Applied Economics Staff Paper. St. Paul: International Science and Technology Practice and Policy (InSTePP) center and the Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
- ———. 2017b. Recalibrating the Reported Returns to Agricultural R&D: What if We All Heeded Griliches? InSTePP and Department of Applied Economics Staff Paper. St. Paul: International Science and Technology Practice and Policy (InSTePP) center and the Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Ruttan, V. 1982. Agricultural Research Policy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- United Nations Statistics Division. UN National Accounts Main Aggregates Database (United Nations, 2013., Accessed at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/introduction.asp).
- United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2013. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. New York: United Nations. Data downloaded October 29, 2013 from http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/
- Wang, S.L., E.V. Ball, L.E. Fulginiti and A.S. Plastina. Benefits of Public R&D in U.S. Agriculture: Spill-ins, Extension and Roads, Selected Paper from International Association of Agricultural Economists Triennial meeting, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil 18–24 August, 2012. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/126368
- World Bank. World Development Indicators 2015 Washington D.C.: World Bank (available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/21634).
- Zvi Griliches. (1957). Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. PhD Dissertation. Department of Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar