Bangladeshi New Women’s ‘Smart’ Dressing: Negotiating Class, Culture, and Religion

  • Nazia Hussein


This chapter places respectable femininity at the centre of the construction and performance of new womanhood among affluent middle-class women of Dhaka, Bangladesh. I study women’s hybrid sartorial practices to investigate how new women merge the boundaries of respectable middle-class Bengali cultural attire of sari and salwar kameez with working-class Islamic religious attire of hijab and upper-class and Western women’s sexualised attires, a hybrid aesthetic practice which I call smart dressing. New women’s practices of smart dressing distinguish them as a symbolic group challenging the boundaries of tradition and modernity, local and global, and provide an image of womanhood that is contrary to the poor, uneducated, traditional, bound by religion, sexually constrained, and victimised ‘third-world woman’.


  1. Azim, F. 2007. Women and Religion in Bangladesh: New Paths. [Online] 50.50 Inclusive Democracy. Available at: Accessed 12 Jan 2015.
  2. ———. 2010. Getting to Know You, or the Formation of Inter-Asian Identities. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 11 (2): 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begum, A. 2008. Magical Shadows: Women in the Bangladeshi Media. Dhaka: South Asian Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 1992. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Trans. R. Nice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2008. The Forms of Capital. In Economic Sociology, ed. N.W. Biggart, 280–291. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, A.H. 2000. Fashioning Change: Nationalism, Colonialism, and Modernity in Hong Kong. Postcolonial Studies 3 (3): 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chatterjee, P. 1989. Colonialism, Nationalism, and Colonialized Women: The Contest in India. American Ethnologist 16 (4): 622–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 1997. Our Modernity. Rotterdam: Sephis.Google Scholar
  11. Fernando, W.D.A., and L. Cohen. 2013. Respectable Femininity and Career Agency: Exploring Paradoxical Imperatives. Gender, Work & Organisation 21 (2): 141–169.Google Scholar
  12. Ganguly-Scrase, R., and T.J. Scrase. 2008. Globalisation and the Middle Classes in India: The Social and Cultural Impact of Neoliberal Reforms. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gilbertson, A. 2011. Within the Limits: Respectability, Class and Gender in Hyderabad. Ph.D. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2014. A Fine Balance: Negotiating Fashion and Respectable Femininity in Middle-Class Hyderabad, India. Modern Asian Studies 48 (01): 120–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ho, S. 2013. Salwar Kameez. Singapore Infopedia. [online] Available at: Accessed 4 Mar 2015.
  17. Hussain, N.A. 2010. Religion and Modernity: Gender and Identity Politics in Bangladesh. Women’s Studies International Forum 33: 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hussein, N. 2015. Boundaries of Respectability: New Women of Bangladesh. Ph.D. University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2017a. Negotiating Middle-Class Respectable Femininity: Bangladeshi Women and Their Families. SAMAJ 16. Available at: Accessed 11 Oct 2017.
  20. ———. 2017b. Reading the New Women of Bangladesh Through Mobile Phone Advertisements. In Media and Cultural Identity: Texts and Contexts, ed. Z.H. Raju and Asaduzzaman. Dhaka: University Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Janeja, M. 2010. Transactions in Taste: The Collaborative Lives of Everyday Bengali Food. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kabeer, N. 1991. The Quest for National Identity: Women, Islam and the State in Bangladesh. Feminist Review 37 (1): 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laberge, S. 1995. Toward an Integration of Gender into Bourdieu’s Concept of Cultural Capital. Sociology of Sport Journal 12: 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lamont, M. 1992. Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lamont, M., Pendergrass, S., and Pachucki, M. 2015. Symbolic Boundaries. [Online] Available at: Accessed 17 July 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liechty, M. 2003. Suitably Modern: Making Middle-Class Culture in a New Consumer Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Loomba, A. 1997. The Long and Saggy Sari. Women: A Cultural Review 8 (3): 278–292.Google Scholar
  28. Lovell, T. 2000. Thinking Feminism with and Against Bourdieu. Feminist Theory 1 (1): 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mankekar, P. 1999. Screening Culture, Viewing Politics: An Ethnography of Television, Womanhood, and Nation in Postcolonial India. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mapril, J. 2013. The Dreams of Middle Class: Consumption, Life-Course and Migration Between Bangladesh and Portugal. Modern Asian Studies. 48 (3): 693–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mears, A. 2014. Aesthetic Labor for the Sociologies of Work, Gender, and Beauty. Sociology Compass 8 (12): 1330–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohanty, C. 2003. Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mohanty, C.T., A. Russo, and L. Torres. 1991. Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mount, L. 2017. Saris and Contemporary Indian Womanhood: How Middle-Class Women Navigate the Tradition/Modernity Split. Contemporary South Asia 25 (2): 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pereira, M.D.M. 2010. Pushing the Boundaries of Knowledge: An Ethnography of Negotiations of the Epistemic Status of Women’s, Gender, Feminist Studies in Portugal. Ph.D. London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  36. Pettinger, L. 2004. Brand Culture and Branded Workers: Service Work and Aesthetic Labour in Fashion Retail. Consumption Markets & Culture 7 (2): 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Radhakrishnan, S. 2009. Professional Women, Good Families: Respectable Femininity and the Cultural Politics of a ‘New’ India. Qualitative Sociology 32 (2): 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2011. Appropriately Indian: Gender and Culture in a New Transnational Class. Durham/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ross-Smith, A., and K. Huppatz. 2010. Management, Women and Gender Capital. Gender, Work & Organisation 17 (5): 547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rozario, S. 2006. The New Burqa in Bangladesh: Empowerment or Violation of Women’s Rights? Women’s Studies International Forum 29: 368–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sabur, S. 2010. Mobility Through Affinal Relations: Bangladeshi ‘Middle-Class’, Transnational Immigrants and Networking. Ph.D. National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  42. Skeggs, B. 1997. Formations of Class & Gender: Becoming Respectable. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Stevens, S.E. 2003. Figuring Modernity: The New Woman and the Modern Girl in Republican China. NWSA Journal 15 (3): 82–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Talukdar, J., and A. Linders. 2013. Gender, Class Aspirations, and Emerging Fields of Body Work in Urban India. Qualitative Sociology 36 (1): 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tarlo, E. 1996. Clothing Matters: Dress and Identity in India. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
  46. Thapan, M. 2004. Embodiment and Identity in Contemporary Society: Femina and the ‘New’ Indian Woman. Contributions to Indian Sociology 38 (3): 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. ———. 2009. Living the Body: Embodiment, Womanhood and Identity in Contemporary India. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Schendel, W. 2009. A History of Bangladesh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Warhurst, C., D. Nickson, A. Witz, and A. Marie Cullen. 2000. Aesthetic Labour in Interactive Service Work: Some Case Study Evidence from the ‘New’ Glasgow. Service Industries Journal 20 (3): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Watt, P. 2006. Respectability, Roughness and ‘Race’: Neighbourhood Place Images and the Making of Working-Class Social Distinctions in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (4): 776–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Witz, A., C. Warhurst, and D. Nickson. 2003. The Labour of Aesthetics and the Aesthetics of Organisation. Organisation 10 (1): 33–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nazia Hussein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyBirmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations