Potential of Porsche Reference Cars for Aerodynamic Development

  • Francesca Cogotti
  • Michael Pfadenhauer
  • Thomas Wiegand
Conference paper

Abstract

The new Porsche wind tunnel was built in three years from 2011 and 2014. In the meantime, Porsche decided to build two reference cars, so as to be able to compare the pressure distribution on the vehicle surface, both on the road and in the wind tunnel.

The concept of having a reference car to compare results on the road and in the wind tunnel is not new. In the case of Porsche, the choice of the vehicles was guided by two requirements, i.e. to have a car shape typical of the Porsche family and to produce different blockage effects.

The cars were equipped with the best available instrumentation, which was carefully calibrated in order to insure accuracy and repeatability.

Multiple road tests and measurements in various state of the art wind tunnels, with different moving ground simulation systems and different geometries, were then carried out.

As a result of the post processing of these data, it has been possible to recognize interference effects in the various wind tunnels.

Porsche has then used these vehicles in the calibration phase of the new wind tunnel, so as to reach a flow quality, in terms of time-averaged values, that is as close as possible to conditions experienced on the road.

Furthermore, thanks to the interchangeable moving ground system in the new Porsche wind tunnel, the reference cars were able to show clearly, for the same wind tunnel interferences, the differences in the pressure distribution caused by the two different moving ground systems.

In addition, thanks to the high-quality 5 belt system, it was possible to measure the cD_vent (ventilation drag), necessary to improve the prediction of Fx in coast-down tests. A comparison between wind tunnel and coast-down results was carried out and will be shown.

Acronyms

CFD

Computational fluid dynamics

WRU

Wheel rotation unit

WT

Wind tunnel

AWT

Aerodynamic wind tunnel

NWT

New Porsche wind tunnel

Count

0.001

cP

Pressure coefficient

\( {\text{c}}_{\text{p}}^{*} \)

Pressure coefficient measured from the reference car (it means calculated with pRef instead of p)

pref

Reference pressure on the bonnet of the car

cD

Drag coefficient

cD_vent

Ventilation drag coefficient

Fxwheel

Ventilation and rolling resistance on the wheel

FRoll

Rolling resistance

FVent

Ventilation drag

Notes

Acknowledgement

The preparation of the cars, the measurements in all of the various wind tunnels and the final tuning of the new Porsche wind tunnel was a huge task. The authors wish to acknowledge several colleagues at Porsche, who helped in this challenging and interesting project.

Dr. G. Estrada, before leaving Porsche, started this project and his know-how, as shared through his PhD work, has been an important contribution.

Mr. T. Weiser did a huge work in the Workshop to transform a normal car in a precise “reference car”.

Mr. S. Gehrmann and Mr. M. Frasch for their support with the hardware and software installation. They were always important to solve last-minute problems.

The Expert Group, Dr. T. Wolf, Dr. R. Mueller and Mr. J. Meder for their useful support and contribution in the final adjustment of the new wind tunnel.

The wind tunnel operators and workers for their efforts during the large number of measurements.

Mr. K. Thomann and Mr. H. Denzinger of the Porsche Energy Management Department for their contribution in conducting the coast-down tests.

A special thank you is also addressed to the colleagues of the external wind tunnels, who gave the authors the possibility to measure our reference cars and to have open and constructive discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    Duell, E., Kharazi, A., Muller, S., Ebelking, W., Merker, E.: The BMW AVZ Wind Tunnel Center. SAE 2010-01-0118Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stumpf, H., Röser, P., Wiegand, T., Pfäfflin, B., Ocker, J., Müller, R., Eckert, W., Kroß, H.-U., Wallmann, S.: The new aerodynamic and aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel of the Porsche AG. In: FKFS Symposium (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Estrada, G.: Das Fahrzeug als aerodynamischer Sensor. Band 54 IVK StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Estrada, G., Wiedemann, J., Widdecke, N.: The vehicle as an aerodynamic sensor in the Wind Tunnel and on the road. In: FKFS Symposium (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mercker, E., Wiedemann, J.: On the correction of interference effects in open jet wind tunnels. SAE Paper No. 960671 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mercker, E., Wickern, G., Wiedemann, J.: Contemplation of nozzle blockage on open jet wind tunnels in view of different Q-determination techniques. SAE Paper No. 970136 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mercker, E., Cooper, K.R.: A two-measurement correction fort the effect of a pressure gradient on automotive, open-jet, wind tunnel measurements. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-0568 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mercker, E., Cooper, K.R., Fischer, O., Wiedemann, J.: The influence of a horizontal pressure distribution on aerodynamic dragGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Final Report EADE Correlation Test (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meder, J., Stumpf, H., Röser, P.: Der neue aerodynamische und aeroakustische Windkanal der Porsche AG. VDI Wissensforum, Simulation und Erprobung in der Fahrzeugentwicklung (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hucho, W.H.: Aerodynamik der stumpfen Körper Ed., p. 434, Fig. 9.8 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collin, C., Mack, S., Indinger, T., Müller, J.: A numerical and Experimental Evaluation of open jet wind tunnel. SAE 2016-01-1597Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yano, S.: Drag force measurement accuracy improvement on a full-scale single belt automotive wind tunnel. SATA Meeting (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Link, A., Kuthada, T., Widdecke, N., Wittmeier, F., Wiedemann, J.: Analyse, Messung und Optimierung des Ventilationswiderstands von Pkw-Rädern – FAT Schriftenreihe Nr. 291, Verband der Automobilindustrie (VDA), Berlin (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Link, A., Kuthada, T., Widdecke, N., Wittmeier, F., Wiedemann, J.: Bestimmung des aerodynamischen Ventilationswiderstands von Pkw-Rädern. Haus der Technik (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Regulation no. 83, Revision 5, United Nations (2015). (E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.82/Rev.5 − E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.82/Rev.5)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca Cogotti
    • 1
  • Michael Pfadenhauer
    • 1
  • Thomas Wiegand
    • 1
  1. 1.Porsche AGWeissachGermany

Personalised recommendations