Advertisement

Previous Research into Neighbourhood Watch

  • Vasco Lub
Chapter
Part of the Crime Prevention and Security Management book series (CPSM)

Abstract

This chapter covers studies on neighbourhood watch from the English-speaking world as well as all available studies from the Netherlands, where research on the topic is still in its infancy. In the English-speaking world, the phenomenon of neighbourhood watch has been investigated since at least the 1980s, primarily in terms of its effective contribution to lower crime levels. The literature overview starts in the 1990s by discussing findings from meta-analyses and some single studies. One of the main conclusions is that the international literature on neighbourhood watch is too much focussed on efficacy (does it work?) and not enough on social effects and mechanisms (how does it work?).

Keywords

Neighbourhood watch research Neighbourhood watch literature Community crime prevention 

References

  1. Akkermans, M., & Vollaard, B. (2015). Effect van het WhatsApp-project in Tilburg op het aantal woninginbraken – een evaluatie. Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Does neighborhood watch reduce crime? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 437–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. (2008). The effectiveness of neighborhood watch. Pontypridd: The Campbell Collaboration.Google Scholar
  4. Boutasmit, M. (2012). De perceptie van buurtsurveillance. Een sociologisch onderzoek naar de sociale mechanismen van buurtsurveillance die leiden tot aanpassing of voortzetting van normoverschrijdend gedrag door jongeren. Masterscriptie, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Hope, T. (1995). Community crime prevention. In M. Tonry & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Building a safer society, Crime and justice (Vol. 19). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Husain, S. (1990). Neighborhood watch and crime: An assessment of impact. London: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Laycock, G., & Tilley, N. (1995). Policing and neighbourhood watch: Strategic issues. London: Home Office Police Department.Google Scholar
  8. Liddle, M., & Gelsthorpe, L. (1994). Inter-agency crime prevention: Organising local delivery, Crime prevention unit paper 52. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  9. McConville, M., & Shepherd, D. (1992). Watching police, watching communities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Sampson, R., Raudenbusch, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sherman, L. W. (1997). Policing for crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. C. Gottfredson, D. L. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter, & S. Bushway (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising (pp. 8-1–8-58). Washington, DC: US Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  12. Sherman, L. W., & Eck, J. E. (2002). Policing for crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. P. Farrington, B. C. Welsh, & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 295–329). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Titus, R. (1984). Residential burglary and the community response. In R. V. G. Clarke & T. Hope (Eds.), Coping with burglary (pp. 97–130). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. van der Land, M. (2014). De buurtwacht. Naar een balans tussen instrumentalisering en autonomie van burgers in veiligheid. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
  15. van Essen, J. (2015). Tussentijdse evaluatie buurtpreventiebeleid Samenwerkende Gemeenten Aalburg, Werkendam en Woudrichem. Bachelorscriptie, Avans Hogeschool Breda.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasco Lub
    • 1
  1. 1.Erasmus University SociologyBureau for social argumentationRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations