Emission of Toxic Air Pollutants and Greenhouse Gases from Crop Residue Open Burning in Southeast Asia

  • Nguyen Thi Kim Oanh
  • Didin Agustian Permadi
  • Nguyen Phan Dong
  • Dang Anh Nguyet
Chapter
Part of the Springer Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry book series (SPRINGERREMO)

Abstract

Agricultural crop production plays an important role in the economic development of Southeast Asia (SEA) countries. Annually, large amounts of crop residues are generated and field open burning for land clearing is commonly practiced which emits considerable amounts of toxic air pollutants and climate forcing agents. This study estimated the emissions of toxic gases, aerosol, and greenhouse gases from the crop residue open burning (CROB) in SEA countries. Emission inventory (EI) was done using the activity data gathered from primary surveys and published records for the SEA countries. The best estimates of emission species were calculated using the emission factors and the activity data that were most relevant for the considered SEA countries. In 2010, the SEA CROB emissions, in Gg were: 16,160 for CO; 320 for NOx; 28 for SO2; 980 for NMVOC; 550 for NH3; 2060 for PM10; 1880 for PM2.5; 80 for BC; 885 for OC; 178,370 for CO2; 580 for CH4; and 14 for N2O. Indonesia was the top contributor of all emission species (25–39%) followed by Vietnam (17–30%), Myanmar (8–19%), and Thailand (7–16%). Among 8 crop types considered, rice straw field burning contributed dominantly (85–98%) to the total SEA CROB emissions, followed by sugarcane, maize, and soybean. Low and high emission estimates were calculated using the ranges of activity data and available emission factors, respectively, to assess the uncertainty of the emission estimate for each species. The obtained gridded SEA CROB emissions with a resolution of 0.1° × 0.1° revealed higher emission intensity over the agricultural land areas, especially of rice, sugarcane, and maize. Temporal emissions showed higher peaks in the months following major crop harvesting periods in the dry season. The EI data for CROB produced in this study provided a key input for assessment of relative contributions of the emission sources in the SEA for further development of emission reduction strategies.

Keywords

Open burning Crop residue Gridded emission Monthly variations SEA 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the United State Agency for International Development—The National Science Foundation (USAID—NSF) for funding the Partnerships for Enhanced Engagement in Research (PEER)—Southeast Asia (SEA) Research Network project (PEER-SEA) which enabled this study. The FAO and various national statistical agencies are highly acknowledged for providing online crop data. We thank the NASA and USGS for providing the free online MODIS land cover and burned area products.

References

  1. Andreae MO, Merlet P (2001) Emissions of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 15:955–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badarinath KVS, Kharol SK, Latha KM, Chand TR, Prasad VK, Jyothsna AN, Samatha K (2007) Multiyear ground-based and satellite observations of aerosol properties over a tropical urban area in India. Atmos Sci Lett 8(1):7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badarinath KVS, Kharol SK, Krishna Prasad V, Kaskaoutis DG, Kambezidis HD (2008) Variation in aerosol properties over Hyderabad, India during intense cyclonic conditions. Int J Remote Sens 29(15):4575–4597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badarinath KVS, Sharma AR, Kharol SK, Prasad VK (2009) Variations in CO, O3 and black carbon aerosol mass concentrations associated with planetary boundary layer (PBL) over tropical urban environment in India. J Atmos Chem 62(1):73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chetthamrongchai P, Auansakul A, Supawan D (2001) Assessing the transportation problems of the sugarcane industry in Thailand, Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific. No. 70Google Scholar
  6. Christian TJ, Kleiss B, Yokelson RJ, Holzinger R, Crutzen PJ, Hao WM, Saharjo BH, Ward DE (2009) Comprehensive laboratory measurements of biomass-burning emissions: 1. Emissions from Indonesian, African, and other fuels. Geophysical Researc 108(D23):4719–4732Google Scholar
  7. DEDE (2003) Rice in Thailand. Bangkok: Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency (DEDE)Google Scholar
  8. Dong NP (2013) Development of Spatial and Temporal Emission Inventory for Biomass Open Burning in Vietnam. AIT Master Thesis. Pathumthani, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  9. EDGAR (2012) Global Emission Dataset. Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR). http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=42
  10. FAO Statistics (2015) Food Agriculture Organization statistic division. http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/*/E
  11. Gadde B (2007) Current uses of rice straw in Philippines—questionnaire survey. cum personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  12. Gadde B, Bonnet S, Menke C, Garivait S (2009) Air pollutant emissions from rice straw open field burning in India, Thailand and the Philippines. Environ Pollut 157(5):1554–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. GSO (2011) General Statistic Office of Vietnam. http://www.gso.gov.vn
  14. IPCC (2006) Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html
  15. Kanabkaew T, Kim Oanh NT (2011) Development of spatial and temporal emission inventory for crop residue field burning. Environ Model Assess 16(5):453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim Oanh NT (2012) Chapter 13: Integrated approach to rice straw management for reduction of field-burning activity. In: Kim Oanh NT (ed) Integrated air quality management Asian Case Studies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim Oanh NT, Bich TL, Tipayarom D, Manandhar BR, Prapat P, Simpson C (2011) Characterization of particulate emission from open burning of rice straw. Atmos Environ 45(2):493–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim Oanh NT, Tipayarom A, Ly Bich T, Tipayarom D, Simpson CD, Hardie D, Liu LJS (2015) Characterization of gaseous and semi-volatile organic compounds emitted from field burning of rice straw. Atmos Environ 119:182–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klinmalee A (2008) The development of assessment procedure for exposure to open rice straw burning emission: a case study of school children in Thailand. AIT dissertation, Pathumthani, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  20. Koopmans A, Koppejan J (1998) Agricultural and forest residues—generation, utilization and availability. In FAO 1998. Regional consultation on modern application on biomass energy. January 6–10, 1997. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  21. Launio CC, Constancio A, Asis Jr, Manalili RG, Javier EF (2013) Economic Analysis of Rice Straw Management Alternatives and Understanding Farmers’ Choices. Published by WorldFish (ICLARM) - Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), Los Banos, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  22. Le TH, Nguyen TNT, Lasko K, Ilavajhala S, Vadrevu KP, Justice C (2014) Vegetation fires and air pollution in Vietnam. Environ Pollut 195:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lualon U, Lerdphornsuttirat N, Zusman E, Sano D (2013) Environmental governance and short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs): the case of open burning in Thailand. IGES Working Paper No. 2013-03. http://pub.iges.or.jp/modules/envirolib/upload/4770/attach/IGES_Working_Paper_2013-03.pdf
  24. Makarim AK, Sumanto S (2007) Rice straw: management and utilization. Research and Development Center of Agriculture. Ministry of Agriculture. Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  25. Marshall S, Taylor JA, Oglesby RJ, Larson JW, Erickson DJ (1996) Climatic effects of biomass burning. Environ Softw 11(3):53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MOA (2011) Database of agricultural statistics. Ministry of Agriculture of Indonesia. http://aplikasi.deptan.go.id/bdsp/index.asp
  27. OAE (2011) Thailand agricultural statistic yearbook in 2011. Bangkok: Office of Agriculture Economics (OAE)Google Scholar
  28. Penner JE, Chuang CC, Liousse C (1996) The contribution of carbonaceous aerosols to climate change 14th International Conference on Nucleation and Atmospheric Aerosols, 26–30 August 1996, Helisinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  29. Permadi DA, Kim Oanh NT (2013) Assessment of biomass open burning emissions in Indonesia and potential climate forcing impact. Atmos Environ 78:250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rumbayan M (2004) Biomass energy resources assessment in North Sulawesi. Biomass Energy Resour 10(3):223–226Google Scholar
  31. Sasongko WR, Wishnu IMW, Yohannes GB (2004). Livestock farming systems technology application for goat in a dry land village, Sambelia. Research and Development Center of Ministry of Agriculture. http://ntb.litbang.deptan.go.id/ind/2004/NP/penerapanteknologi.doc
  32. Shi Y, Yamaguchi Y (2014) A high-resolution and multi-year emissions inventory for biomass burning in Southeast Asia during 2001–2010. Atmos Environ 98:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shrestha RM, Kim Oanh NT, Shrestha R, Rupakheti M, Permadi DA, Kanabkaew T, Salony R (2013) Atmospheric Brown Cloud (ABC) Emission Inventory Manual (EIM). United Nation Environmental Programme (UNEP). Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  34. Sornpoon W, Bonnet S, Kasemsap P, Prasertsak P, Garivait S (2014) Estimation of emissions from sugarcane field burning in Thailand using bottom-up country-specific activity data. Atmos 5:669–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Streets DG, Bond TC, Carmichael GR, Fernandes SD, Fu Q, He D, Klimont Z, Nelson SM, Tsai NY, Wang MQ, Woo JH, Yarber KF (2003) An inventory of gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in Asia in the year 2000. J Geophys Res 108(D21):8809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tipayarom D, Kim Oanh NT (2007) Effects from open rice straw burning emission on air quality in Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Sci Asia 33(3):339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Towprayoon S, Bonnet S, Garivait S, Chidthaisong A (2007) Greenhouse gas and aerosol emission from rice field and forest in the Mekong River Basin Sub-region. GMSARN International conference on Sustainable Development: Challenges and Opportunities for GMSGoogle Scholar
  38. Vadrevu K, Lasko K (2015) Fire regimes and potential bioenergy loss from agricultural lands in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. J Environ Manag 148:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vadrevu KP, Ellicott E, Badarinath KVS, Vermote E (2011) MODIS derived fire characteristics and aerosol optical depth variations during the agricultural residue burning season, north India. Environ Pollut 159(6):1560–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vadrevu KP, Csiszar I, Ellicott E, Giglio L, Badarinath KVS, Vermote E, Justice C (2013a) Hotspot analysis of vegetation fires and intensity in the Indian region. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 6(1):224–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vadrevu KP, Giglio L, Justice C (2013b) Satellite based analysis of fire–carbon monoxide relationships from forest and agricultural residue burning (2003–2011). Atmos Environ 64:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vadrevu KP, Lasko K, Giglio L, Justice C (2015) Vegetation fires, absorbing aerosols and smoke plume characteristics in diverse biomass burning regions of Asia. Environ Res Lett 10(10):105003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van der Werf DG, Randerson JT, Giglio L, Collatz GJ et al (2010) Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009). Atmos Chem Phys 10:11707–11735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woo JH, Streets DG, Carmichael GR, Tang Y, Yoo B, Lee WC, Thongboonchoo N et al (2003) Contribution of biomass and biofuel emissions to trace gas distributions in Asia during the TRACE-P experiment. J Geophys Res 108(D21):8812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. World Growth (2011) The economic benefit of palm oil to Indonesia: A Report by World Growth. http://worldgrowth.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/WG_Indonesian_Palm_Oil_Benefits_Report-2_11.pdf
  46. Yevich R, Logan JA (2003) An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world. Journal of. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 17:1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nguyen Thi Kim Oanh
    • 1
  • Didin Agustian Permadi
    • 1
  • Nguyen Phan Dong
    • 1
  • Dang Anh Nguyet
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Engineering and Management, School of Environment, Resources and DevelopmentAsian Institute of TechnologyPathumthaniThailand

Personalised recommendations