Racing Heart and Sweaty Palms

What Influences Users’ Self-Assessments and Physiological Signals When Interacting with Virtual Audiences?
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10498)

Abstract

In psychotherapy, virtual audiences have been shown to promote successful outcomes when used to help treating public speaking anxiety. Additionally, early experiments have shown its potential to help improve public speaking ability. However, it is still unclear to what extent certain factors, such as audience non-verbal behaviors, impact users when interacting with a virtual audience. In this paper, we design an experimental study to investigate users’ self-assessments and physiological states when interacting with a virtual audience. Our results showed that virtual audience behaviors did not influence participants self-assessments or physiological responses, which were instead predominantly determined by participants’ prior anxiety levels.

Keywords

Virtual audience Public speaking Physiological state 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benedek, M., Kaernbach, C.: A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 190(1), 80–91 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chollet, M., Chandrashekhar, N., Shapiro, A., Morency, L.-P., Scherer, S.: Manipulating the perception of virtual audiences using crowdsourced behaviors. In: Traum, D., Swartout, W., Khooshabeh, P., Kopp, S., Scherer, S., Leuski, A. (eds.) IVA 2016. LNCS, vol. 10011, pp. 164–174. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chollet, M., Wortwein, T., Morency, L.P., Shapiro, A., Scherer, S.: Exploring feedback strategies to improve public speaking: an interactive virtual audience framework. In: Proceedings of UbiComp. 2015. ACM, Osaka (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geisler, F.C., Vennewald, N., Kubiak, T., Weber, H.: The impact of heart rate variability on subjective well-being is mediated by emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences 49(7), 723–728 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang, N., Brinkman, W.P., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Neerincx, M.: The design of virtual audiences: Noticeable and recognizable behavioral styles. Computers in Human Behavior 55, 680–694 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paul, G.: Insight vs. Desensitization in Psychotherapy: An Experiment in Anxiety Reduction. Stanford University Press (1966)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pertaub, D.P., Slater, M., Barker, C.: An experiment on public speaking anxiety in response to three different types of virtual audience. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11(1), 68–78 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Price, M., Anderson, P.L.: Outcome expectancy as a predictor of treatment response in cognitive behavioral therapy for public speaking fears within social anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy 49(2), 173 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Safir, M.P., Wallach, H.S., Bar-Zvi, M.: Virtual reality cognitive-behavior therapy for public speaking anxiety: one-year follow-up. Behavior modification (2011). 0145445511429999Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathieu Chollet
    • 1
  • Talie Massachi
    • 1
  • Stefan Scherer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Creative TechnologiesUniversity of Southern CaliforniaPlaya VistaUSA

Personalised recommendations