Advertisement

A Categorization of Virtual Agent Appearances and a Qualitative Study on Age-Related User Preferences

  • Carolin StraßmannEmail author
  • Nicole C. Krämer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10498)

Abstract

Various variables influence the perception of appearance, which are difficult to examine holistically in a quantitative approach. To give a holistic overview of appearance variables, a systematic categorization of different dimensions was developed. This is also of special importance with a view to the application field of companions for seniors whose preferences regarding appearance are under-researched. Therefore, based on the categorization, 11 interviews with two different target groups (six students, five elderly) were conducted. Results indicate that seniors tend to prefer a realistic humanoid agent, while students mostly rejected this appearance and instead favored zoomorphic or machinelike agents in comic stylization. In sum, the current research gives a first hint that there are age-related differences with regard to appearance.

Keywords

Visual appearance Categorization Daily-life support Age differences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baylor, A.L.: Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: role of visual presence and appearance. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 364, 3559–3565 (2009). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Terada, K., Jing, L., Yamada, S.: Effects of agent appearance on customer buying motivations on online shopping sites. In: CHI 2015 Ext. Abstr., pp. 929–934, April 18–23, 2015Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sträfling, N., Fleischer, I., Polzer, C., Leutner, D., Krämer, N.C.: Teaching learning strategies with a pedagogical agent: The effects of a virtual tutor and its appearance on learning and motivation. J. Media Psychol. 22, 73–83 (2010). doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanus, M.D., Fox, J.: Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Comput. Educ. 80, 152–161 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ring, L., Utami, D., Bickmore, T.: The right agent for the job ? the effects of agent visual appearance on task domain. In: Intelligent Virtual Agents, pp. 374–384 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koda, T., Maes, P.: Agents with faces: the effect of personification In:. Proc. 5th IEEE Int. Work. Robot Hum. Commun. RO-MAN 1996, Tsukuba, pp. 189–194 (1996). doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.1996.568812
  7. 7.
    Gulz, A., Haake, M.: Design of animated pedagogical agents - A look at their look. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64, 322–339 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergmann, K., Eyssel, F., Kopp, S.: A second chance to make a first impression? how appearance and nonverbal behavior affect perceived warmth and competence of virtual agents over time. In: Nakano, Y., Neff, M., Paiva, A., Walker, M. (eds.) IVA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7502, pp. 126–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33197-8_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    James, T.W., Potter, R.F., Lee, S., Kim, S., Stevenson, R.A., Lang, A.: How Realistic Should Avatars Be? J. Media Psychol. 27, 109–117 (2015). doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yaghoubzadeh, R., Kramer, M., Pitsch, K., Kopp, S.: Virtual agents as daily assistants for elderly or cognitively impaired people. In: Aylett, R., Krenn, B., Pelachaud, C., Shimodaira, H. (eds.) IVA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8108, pp. 79–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40415-3_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yee, N., Bailenson, J.N., Rickertsen, K.: A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. In: Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. factors Comput. Syst. - CHI 2007, p. 1 (2007). doi: 10.1145/1240624.1240626
  12. 12.
    Chattaraman, V., Kwon, W.-S., Gilbert, J.E., Shim, S.I.: Virtual agents in e-commerce: representational characteristics for seniors. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 5, 276–297 (2011). doi: 10.1108/17505931111191492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gulz, A.: Visual Design of virtual pedagogical agents : naturalism versus stylization in static appearance. In: 6th Int. Conf. Intell. Virtual Agents, IVA 2006, pp. 1–9 (2006). doi: 10.1007/11821830_44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baylor, Amy L., Kim, Y.: Pedagogical agent design: the impact of agent realism, gender, ethnicity, and instructional role. In: Lester, James C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 592–603. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brahnam, S.: Creating physical personalities for agents with faces: modeling trait impressions of the face. In: Proc. UM2001 Work. Attitudes, Personal. Emot. User-Adapted InteractGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bickmore, T.W., Caruso, L., Clough-Gorr, K., Heeren, T.: “It”s just like you talk to a friend’ relational agents for older adults. Interact. Comput. 17, 711–735 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2005.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ritchie, J., Lewis, J.: Qualitative Reasearch Practice A Guide for Social Science Students and Reasearchers. Sage Publications, London (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schreier, M.: Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage Publications (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mayring, P.: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In: Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, pp. 601–613 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Int. Biometric Soc. 33, 159–174 (2008). doi: 10.2307/2529310CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Psychology: Media and CommunicationUniversity Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany

Personalised recommendations