Advertisement

VNF Orchestration and Modeling with ETSI MANO Compliant Frameworks

  • Ales Komarek
  • Jakub Pavlik
  • Lubos Mercl
  • Vladimir SobeslavEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10531)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to compare existing NFV (Network Function Virtualization) management solutions and propose SaltStack based solution with the same goal. Modern approach to govern NFV automation in large scale IT infrastructures is done by virtualization of various network services. Hardware networking devices are gradually replaced by virtual network appliances for the lower acquisition and maintenance costs. Vendors virtualize their physical products so they can be used along or within cloud environments. The ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute) standard MANO (NFV Management and Organization) aims to unify the management of physical and virtual network services and devices to single point of control for configuration and management.

The paper covers the major NFV frameworks that use MANO as their reference architecture with focus on underlying interface technologies. The main focus of the paper is NFV-MANO orchestration engine using SaltStack capabilities that can model and manage heterogeneous NFV and NFVI resources according to the ETSI NFV-MANO specification along software resources already present. This gives us unique ability to cover all data center resources, both hardware or software based in a single model.

Keywords

NFV SDN NFV-MANO Cloud service SaltStack 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work and the contribution were also supported by project of specific science, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

References

  1. 1.
    AT&T: ECOMP (Enhanced Control, Orchestration, Management and Policy) Architecture White Paper. http://about.att.com/content/dam/snrdocs/ecomp.pdf. Accessed 21 Apr 2017
  2. 2.
    Arai, T., Gokurakuji, J., Oohira, M.: MANO technology supports implementation of intelligent network operations management. NEC Tech. J. 10(3), 19–22 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arai, T., Yoshikawa, N., Mibu, R.: Technology systems for SDN/NFV solutions. NEC Tech. J. 10(3), 15–18 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chayapathi, R.: Network Function Virtualization (NFV) with a Touch of SDN. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cloudify - Pure-Play Cloud Orchestration and Automation Based on TOSCA. http://getcloudify.org/. Accessed 20 Apr 2017
  6. 6.
    Coughlin, M., Keller, E., Wustrow, E.: Trusted click: overcoming security issues of NFV in the cloud. In: Proceedings of ACM International Workshop on Security in Software Defined Networks, pp. 31–36 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ersue, M.: ETSI NFV Management and Orchestration - An Overview. https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-opsawg-6.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2017
  8. 8.
    github.com - nfvlabs/openmano: Openmano. https://github.com/nfvlabs/openmano. Accessed 02 Apr 2017
  9. 9.
    Goranson, P., Chuck, B.: Software Defined Networks: A Comprehensive Approach. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jarich, P.: AT&T, ECOMP and the Increasingly Difficult Pace of Virtualization. https://networkmatter.com/2017/02/08/att-ecomp-and-the-increasingly-difficult-pace-of-virtualization/. Accessed 21 Apr 2017
  11. 11.
    Kim, M.S., Do, T., Kim, Y.H.: TOSCA-based clustering service for network function virtualization. In: 2016 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence, ICTC 2016, pp. 1176–1178 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kreutz, D., Ramos, F.M.V., Verissimo, P.E., Rothenberg, C.E., Azodolmolky, S., Uhlig, S.: Software-defined networking: a comprehensive survey. Proc. IEEE 103(1), 14–76 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malik, A., Ahmed, J., Qadir, J., Ilyas, M.U.: A measurement study of open source SDN layers in OpenStack under network perturbation. Comput. Commun. 102(3), 139–149 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mijumbi, R., Serrat, J., Gorricho, J.L., Latre, S., Charalambides, M., Lopez, D.: Management and orchestration challenges in network functions virtualization. IEEE Commun. Mag. 54(1), 98–105 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ming-Wei, S., Mohan, K., Taesoo, K., Gavrilovska, A.: S-NFV: securing NFV states by using SGX. In: Proceedings of 2016 ACM International Workshop on Security in Software Defined Networks, pp. 45–48 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Open Orchestrator. https://www.open-o.org. Accessed 19 Apr 2017
  17. 17.
    RIFT.io - Build Deploy Carrier-Grade Virtualized Network Services. https://riftio.com/. Accessed 21 Apr 2017
  18. 18.
    Sonkoly, B., Szabo, R., Jocha, D., Czentye, K., Kind, J., Westphal, F.J.: UNIFYing cloud and carrier network resources: an architectural view. In: 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–7 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    TOSCA Simple Profile for Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) Version 1.0. http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/tosca-nfv/v1.0/tosca-nfv-v1.0.html. Accessed 04 Apr 2017
  20. 20.
    Tracker - OpenStack. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tacker. Accessed 18 Apr 2017
  21. 21.
    Yousaf, F.Z., Goncalves, C., Moreira-Matias, L., Perez, X.C.: RAVA - resource aware VNF agnostic NFV orchestration method for virtualized networks. In: IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, PIMRC (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ales Komarek
    • 1
  • Jakub Pavlik
    • 1
  • Lubos Mercl
    • 1
  • Vladimir Sobeslav
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Informatics and ManagementUniversity of Hradec KraloveHradec KraloveCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations