Skip to main content

Improved Diagnosis and Care for Rare Diseases through Implementation of Precision Public Health Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rare Diseases Epidemiology: Update and Overview

Abstract

Public health relies on technologies to produce and analyse data, as well as effectively develop and implement policies and practices. An example is the public health practice of epidemiology, which relies on computational technology to monitor the health status of populations, identify disadvantaged or at risk population groups and thereby inform health policy and priority setting. Critical to achieving health improvements for the underserved population of people living with rare diseases is early diagnosis and best care. In the rare diseases field, the vast majority of diseases are caused by destructive but previously difficult to identify protein-coding gene mutations. The reduction in cost of genetic testing and advances in the clinical use of genome sequencing, data science and imaging are converging to provide more precise understandings of the ‘person-time-place’ triad. That is: who is affected (people); when the disease is occurring (time); and where the disease is occurring (place). Consequently we are witnessing a paradigm shift in public health policy and practice towards ‘precision public health’.

Patient and stakeholder engagement has informed the need for a national public health policy framework for rare diseases. The engagement approach in different countries has produced highly comparable outcomes and objectives. Knowledge and experience sharing across the international rare diseases networks and partnerships has informed the development of the Western Australian Rare Diseases Strategic Framework 2015–2018 (RD Framework) and Australian government health briefings on the need for a National plan.

The RD Framework is guiding the translation of genomic and other technologies into the Western Australian health system, leading to greater precision in diagnostic pathways and care, and is an example of how a precision public health framework can improve health outcomes for the rare diseases population.

Five vignettes are used to illustrate how policy decisions provide the scaffolding for translation of new genomics knowledge, and catalyze transformative change in delivery of clinical services. The vignettes presented here are from an Australian perspective and are not intended to be comprehensive, but rather to provide insights into how a new and emerging ‘precision public health’ paradigm can improve the experiences of patients living with rare diseases, their caregivers and families.

The conclusion is that genomic public health is informed by the individual and family needs, and the population health imperatives of an early and accurate diagnosis; which is the portal to best practice care. Knowledge sharing is critical for public health policy development and improving the lives of people living with rare diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nearly all genetic diseases are rare diseases, not all rare diseases are genetic diseases. There are also very rare forms of infectious diseases, auto-immune diseases and rare cancers. To date, the cause remains unknown for many rare diseases. http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/Education_AboutRareDiseases.php?lng=EN

  2. 2.

    The expanding role of genetics in medicine and health necessitates international collaborative efforts to create sound and just frameworks from which to build and further the research and applications of genomic technologies. Policy makers have a significant role to play in the redirection of local and global resources into genetic research and development to target the specific health needs of their communities. Their advocacy can advance genomics research and technologies, enhance the transfer and exchange of genomic information, encourage global collaborations, and improve health services worldwide. http://www.who.int/genomics/policy/Genomicsandpolicy/en/

  3. 3.

    http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/4526/precision-public-health

  4. 4.

    http://www.datalinkage-wa.org.au/data-collections. Accessed 31 August 2016

  5. 5.

    “In just 4 years, more than 1000 families with different undiagnosed rare diseases have had their causal genes identified, often with direct and immediate clinical impact. Advancement in this area has led to substantial changes to patient management, including tailoring of medications and halting invasive procedures.” Dr. Kym Boycott http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/49244.html. Accessed 31 August 2016.

  6. 6.

    https://www.genome.one/; also see http://www.garvan.org.au/news/news/new-era-in-genetic-disease-diagnosis-with-australia2019s-first-whole-genome-testing-service-to-be-launched-today

  7. 7.

    The management of E-Rare programme is financed by the European Commission. In addition, in 2015 under the E-Rare3, the EC contributed for the first time in co-financing of research projects. E-Rare consortium is a founding IRDiRC member.

  8. 8.

    www.irdirc.org

  9. 9.

    http://www.irdirc.org/about-us/members/. Accessed 31 August 2016.

  10. 10.

    GA4GH was formed to help accelerate the potential of genomic medicine to advance human health. It brings together over 400 leading institutions working in healthcare, research, disease advocacy, life science, and information technology. The partners in the Global Alliance are working together to create a common framework of harmonized approaches to enable the responsible, voluntary, and secure sharing of genomic and clinical data. http://genomicsandhealth.org/. Accessed 31 August 2016.

  11. 11.

    G2MC is an action collaborative among global leaders in the implementation of genomic medicine in clinical care. The primary purpose is to identify opportunities and foster global collaborations for enabling the demonstration of value and the effective use of genomics in medicine. Engaging multiple stakeholders across the globe, under the auspices of the Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health, to improve global health by catalyzing the implementation of genomic tools and knowledge into health care delivery globally. http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Activities/Research/GenomicBasedResearch/Innovation-Collaboratives/Global_Genomic_Medicine_Collaborative.aspx Accessed 31 August 2016.

  12. 12.

    RD-Connect is a unique global infrastructure project funded by the EU that links up databases, registries, biobanks and clinical bioinformatics data used in rare disease research into a central resource for researchers worldwide. http://rd-connect.eu/. Accessed 31 August 2016.

  13. 13.

    TREAT-NMD is a EU-funded network for the neuromuscular field that provides an infrastructure to ensure that the most promising new therapies reach patients as quickly as possible. Since its launch in January 2007 the network’s focus has been on the development of tools that industry, clinicians and scientists need to bring novel therapeutic approaches through preclinical development and into the clinic, and on establishing best-practice care for neuromuscular patients worldwide. http://www.treat-nmd.eu/. Accessed 31 August 2016.

  14. 14.

    RARE-Bestpractices is a global platform, funded by the EU, to improve the management of rare disease patients with the primary aim to promote communication on the management of rare diseases by disseminating peer validated guidelines and tools globally. http://www.rarebestpractices.eu/. Accessed 31 August 2016.

  15. 15.

    RD-Action is a European Commission Joint Action to improve knowledge on rare diseases, disease classification and orphan drugs and to support the development of national and European policies in the field, RD-ACTION will ensure that there is an integrated, European approach to the challenges faced by the rare diseases community. http://www.rd-action.eu/. Accessed 31 August 2016.

  16. 16.

    ERN’s for rare diseases are being developed to serve as research and knowledge centres, updating and contributing to the latest scientific findings, treating patients from other Member States, and with international partners, to ensure the availability of information and pathways to inform best care and therapies. http://ec.europa.eu/health/rare_diseases/european_reference_networks/erf/index_en.htm#fragment0. Accessed 31 August 2016.

  17. 17.

    RDCRN is designed to advance medical research on rare diseases by providing support for clinical studies and facilitating collaboration, study enrolment and data sharing. Through the RDCRN consortia, physician scientists and their multidisciplinary teams work together with patient advocacy groups to study more than 200 rare diseases at sites across the USA. http://www.ncats.nih.gov/rdcrn. Accessed 31 August 2016.

  18. 18.

    In 2008, the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) Undiagnosed Disease Program (UDP) was initiated to provide diagnoses for individuals who had long sought one without success. Following three international meetings (Rome, Budapest and Austria), the Undiagnosed Diseases Network International (UDNI) was established, modelled in part after the NIH UDP. Undiagnosed diseases are a global health issue, calling for an international scientific and healthcare effort. To meet this demand, the UDNI has built a consensus framework of principles, best practices and governance. The UDNI involves centers with internationally recognized expertise, and its scientific resources and know-how to fill the knowledge gaps that impede diagnosis. Consequently, the UDNI fosters the translation of research into medical practice. Active patient involvement is critical.

  19. 19.

    https://cvp.ucsf.edu/PPHS-Summit-Report-For-Posting.pdf; and http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/4526/precision-public-health

  20. 20.

    http://icord.se/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Helen-Clark-UNDP-Administrator-to-ICORD-Cape-Town-Oct-2016.pdf?bcsi_scan_c221d61a0ea4ff4c=4DVH79WrWv1IYuVp5dgOBmGuzAQmAAAAuiRi8A==&bcsi_scan_filename=Helen-Clark-UNDP-Administrator-to-ICORD-Cape-Town-Oct-2016.pdf

  21. 21.

    http://www.eurordis.org/sites/default/files/press-release-ICORD-RDI-Collaboration-Final.pdf

  22. 22.

    http://www.rarediseasesinternational.org/actions/ngo-committee-for-rare-diseases/

  23. 23.

    The creation of the NGO Committee for Rare Diseases was approved by a vote of CoNGO member organisations in April 2014. Its inception meeting as a Substantive NGO Committee within CoNGO took place in October 2015 in New York. The formal inauguration of the Committee is currently scheduled for early November 2016 at the United Nations headquarters in New York. Accessed October 2016 http://www.ngocommitteerarediseases.org/about-us/

  24. 24.

    United Nations Development Group, a committee consisting of the heads of all UN funds, programmes and departments working on development issues United Nations Development Programme.

  25. 25.

    http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/presscenter/speeches/2013/01/31/helen-clark-empowered-lives-resilient-nations-why-health-matters-to-human-development-.html

  26. 26.

    http://icord.se/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Helen-Clark-UNDP-Administrator-to-ICORD-Cape-Town-Oct-2016.pdf?bcsi_scan_c221d61a0ea4ff4c=4DVH79WrWv1IYuVp5dgOBmGuzAQmAAAAuiRi8A==&bcsi_scan_filename=Helen-Clark-UNDP-Administrator-to-ICORD-Cape-Town-Oct-2016.pdf

  27. 27.

    Possum [Internet]. 2016 [cited 5th August 2016]. Available from: www.possumcore.com

  28. 28.

    https://www.royhill.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/World-First-New-WA-Initiative-to-Improve-Health-Outcomes-for-Aboriginal-Children-1.pdf

  29. 29.

    www.rd-action.eu

  30. 30.

    http://rd-connect.eu/platform/registries/orphanet-knowledge-base/

  31. 31.

    http://www.garvan.org.au/research/kinghorn-centre-for-clinical-genomics/clinical-genomics/about-kccg/teams/phenomics-team#Patient_Archive

  32. 32.

    https://phenotips.org/

  33. 33.

    On January 11, 2016 JST (January 11 EST), the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) signed a Memorandum of Cooperation with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Washington D.C. The agreement covers cooperative research projects, joint seminars, symposia and other scientific meetings, and the exchange of personnel and researchers. AMED expects the agreement to lead to collaboration in areas such as research into rare and undiagnosed diseases. AMED established three overseas offices in FY 2016 in the United States (Washington D.C.), United Kingdom (London), and Singapore.

  34. 34.

    https://www.genome.one/; also see http://www.garvan.org.au/news/news/new-era-in-genetic-disease-diagnosis-with-australia2019s-first-whole-genome-testing-service-to-be-launched-today

References

  1. Abouelhoda M, Faquih T, El-Kalioby M et al (2017) Revisiting the morbid genome of Mendelian disorders. Genet Med Rev 17:235–241 Available from: doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1102-1

  2. Adachi T, Kawamura K, Furusawa Y, Nishizaki Y, Imanishi N, Umehara S, Izumi K, Suematsu M (2017) Japan’s initiative on rare and undiagnosed diseases (IRUD): towards an end to the diagnostic Odyssey. Eur J Hum Genet 25:1025–1028. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2017.106; published online 5 July 2017

  3. Ales M, Luca L, Marija V et al (2016) Phenotype-driven gene target definition in clinical genome-wide sequencing data interpretation. Genet Med 18:1102–1110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amberger J, Bocchini C, Schiettecatte F et al (2015) OMIM.org: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [OMIM], an online catalog of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D789–D798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anonymous (1983) Orphan Drug Act of 1983. In: United States of America

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous (2016) Precision public health summit. University of California, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anonymous (2016) Precision public health. In: Frontiers research topic. Frontiers in public health. Frontiers Editorial Office, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anonymous (2002) Rare Diseases Orphan Product Development Act of 2002. In: H.R. 4014

    Google Scholar 

  9. Austin CP, Dawkins HJS (2017) IRDiRC the next decade. Nature. http://www.nature.com/uidfinder/10.1038/548158c

  10. Austin CP, Cutillo C, Lau L, Jonker A, Rath A, Julkowska D, Thomson D, Terry S, de Montleau B, Ardigo D, Hivert V, Boycott K, Baynam G, Kaufmann P, Taruscio D, Lochmüller H, Suematsu M, Incerti C, Draghia-Akli R, Norstedt I, Wang L, Dawkins HJS (2017) Future of rare diseases research 2017–2027: an IRDiRC perspective Clin Transl Sci. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.12500/full

  11. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2016) Monitoring the health impacts of mandatory folic acid and iodine fortification. In: Council AHMA (ed), Canberra, ACT

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aymé S, Bellet B, Rath A (2015) Rare diseases in ICD11: making rare diseases visible in health information systems through appropriate coding. Orphanet J Rare Dis 10:35

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ayme S, Hamosh A, Rath A et al (2015) Proposal of a core set of terms to describe human phenotypes by the International consortium of human phenotype terminologies. In: International consortium of human phenotype terminologies. International rare diseases research consortium. http://www.irdirc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Proposal-International-Consortium-of-Human-Phenotype-Terminologies.pdf:

  14. Ayme S, Rath A, Bellet B (2010) WHO International Classification of Diseases [ICD] Revision Process: incorporating rare diseases into the classification scheme: state of art. Orphanet J Rare Dis 5:P1

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aymé S, Rodwell C (2011) Report on the state of the art of rare disease activities in Europe of the European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases – Part I: overview of rare disease activities in Europe and key developments in 2010. In: State of the art reports. European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases. Available from: http://www.eucerd.eu/upload/file/Reports/2011ReportStateofArtRDActivities.pdf

  16. Baynam G (2012) The need for genetic studies of Indigenous Australians. Med J Aust 196:313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baynam G, Bauskis B, Pachter N et al (2017, April) Facing precision public health. Front Public Health 5:10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00031

  18. Baynam G, Pachter N, Mckenzie F et al (2015) The rare and undiagnosed diseases diagnostic service. Ann Transl Med 3(Suppl 2):AB002. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.AB002

  19. Baynam G, Pachter N, Mckenzie F et al (2016) The rare and undiagnosed diseases diagnostic service – application of massively parallel sequencing in a statewide clinical service. Orphanet J Rare Dis 11:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baynam G, Walters M, Claes P et al (2014) Phenotyping: targeting genotype’s rich cousin for diagnosis. J Paediatr Child Health 51:381–386

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Baynam G, Walters M, Dawkins H et al (2013) Objective monitoring of mTOR inhibitor therapy by three-dimensional facial analysis. Twin Res Hum Genet 16:840–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baynam G, Walters M, Claes P, Kung S, Lesouef P, Dawkins H, Gillett D, Goldblatt J (2013) The facial evolution: looking backward and moving forward. Hum Mutat 34:14–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beaulieu C, Majewski J, Schwartzentruber J et al (2014) FORGE Canada consortium: outcomes of a 2-year National Rare-Disease Gene-Discovery Project. Am J Hum Genet 94:809–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Beskow L, Khoury M, Baker T et al (2001) The integration of genomics into public health research, policy and practice in the United States. Community Genet 4:2–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Biesecker L (2004) Phenotype matters. Nat Genet 36:323–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bower C, Eades S, Payne J et al (2004) Trends in neural tube defects in Western Australia in indigenous and non-indigenous populations. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 18:277–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bower C, Stanley F (2004) Case for mandatory fortification of food with folate in Australia, for the prevention of neural tube defects. Clin Mol Teratol 70:842–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Boycott K, Vanstone M, Bulman D et al (2013) Rare-disease genetics in the era of next-generation sequencing: discovery to translation. Nat Rev Genet 14:681–691

    Google Scholar 

  29. Burke W, Burton H, Hall A et al (2010) Extending the reach of public health genomics: what should be the agenda for public health in an era of genome-based and ‘personalized’ medicine? Genet Med 12:785–791

    Google Scholar 

  30. Buske O, Girdea M, Dumitriu S et al (2015) Phenome central: a portal for phenotypic and genotypic matchmaking of patients with rare genetic diseases. Hum Mutat 36:931–940

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chief Medical Officer (2009) On the state of public health: annual report of the chief medical officer. In: Department of Health UK (ed) United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.sthc.co.uk/Documents/CMO_Report_2009.pdf?bcsi_scan_c221d61a0ea4ff4c=0&bcsi_scan_filename=CMO_Report_2009.pdf

  32. Dawkins H (2011) Rare diseases – awakening Australia. In: Medical forum. Medical forum magazine, Perth, pp 37

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dawkins H, Molster C, Youngs L et al (2011) Awakening Australia to rare diseases: symposium report and preliminary outcomes. Orphanet J Rare Dis 6:57–59

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dawkins H, Draghia-Akli R, Lasko P, Lau L, Jonker A, Cutillo C, Rath A, Boycott K, Baynam G, Lochmüller H, Kaufmann P, Le Cam Y, Hivert V, Austin C (2017) Progress in rare diseases research 2010–2016: an IRDiRC perspective. Clin Transl Sci. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.12501/full

  35. De Vrueh R, Baekelandt E, De Haan J (2013) Background paper 6.19 rare diseases: update on 2004 background paper written by S. van Weely and H.G.M. Leufkens. In: Priority medicines for Europe and the world: “A public health approach to innovation”. World Health Organization, Geneva, p 46

    Google Scholar 

  36. Department of Health Western Australia (2013) Scoping paper on the need for a national rare diseases plan for Australia. Government of Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  37. Department of Health Western Australia (2015) WA rare diseases strategic framework 2015–2018. In: Department of Health, WA, Perth. http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Reports-and-publications/WA-Rare-Diseases-Strategic-Framework-2015-2018

  38. Dewey F, Grove M, Pan C et al (2014) Clinical interpretation and implications of whole-genome sequencing. J Am Med Assoc 311:1035–1045

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dye D, Brameld K, Maxwell S et al (2011) The impact of single gene and chromosomal disorders on hospital admissions of children and adolescents: a population-based study. Public Health Genomics 14:153–161

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dye D, Brameld K, Maxwell S et al (2011) The impact of single gene and chromosomal disorders on hospital admissions in an adult population. J Community Genet 2:81–90

    Google Scholar 

  41. European Commission (2011) Council recommendation on an action in the field of rare diseases. In: Council recommendation of 8 June 2009 on an action in the field of rare diseases 2009/C 151/02. Offic Journal of the European Union (ed) Šimerka, pp 7–10. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/rare_diseases/national_plans/detailed_en

  42. European Commission (2011) Position statement from the international conference on rare diseases and orphan drugs. In: EC regulation on orphan medicinal products (ed) European Commission, Brussels. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/rare_diseases/policy/index_en.htm

  43. European Commission (2013) National plans or strategies for rare diseases. Public health. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/rare_diseases/national_plans/detailed_en

  44. European Commission (2010) News alert: The European Commission and the US announce joint research efforts on rare diseases. Available from: Research and innovation http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm?pg=newsalert&lg=en&year=2010&na=na-281010

  45. European Organisation for Rare Diseases (2005) Rare diseases: understanding this public health priority. EURORDIS, Paris. Available from: http://www.eurordis.org/IMG/pdf/princeps_document-EN.pdf

  46. European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases (2011) Overview of rare disease activities in Europe & key developments in 2010. In: Aymé S, Rodwell C (eds) EUCERD report on the state of the art of rare disease activities in Europe. EUCERD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  47. Europlan (2010) Recommendations for the development of national plans for rare diseases – guidance document. In: 2010 [10 Jan 2012]. Available from: http://download.eurordis.org/europlan/2_EUROPLAN_Guidance_Documents_for_the_National_Conference/3_EUROPLAN_Draft_Recommendations_8%20March_10.pdf

  48. Gahl W (2012) The battle field of rare diseases: where uncommon insights are common. Sci Transl Med 4:154–156

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gahl W, Tifft C (2011) The NIH undiagnosed diseases program: lessons learned. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 305:1904–1905

    Google Scholar 

  50. Girdea M, Dumitriu S, Fiume M et al (2013) PhenoTips: patient phenotyping software for clinical and research use. Hum Mutat 34:1057–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Graham C, Molster C, Baynam G et al (2014) Current trends in biobanking for rare diseases: a review. J Bioreposit Sci Appl Med 2:49–61

    Google Scholar 

  52. Greer K, Lochmuller H, Flanigan K et al (2014) Targeted exon skipping to correct exon duplications in the dystrophin gene. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 3:e155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Groft S, Posada de la Paz M (2010) Rare diseases – avoiding misperceptions and establishing realities: the need for reliable epidemiological data. In: Advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol 686, pp 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  54. Groza T, Köhler S, Moldenhauer D et al (2015) The human phenotype ontology: semantic unification of common and rare disease. Am J Hum Genet 97:111–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Haendel M, Robinson P, Al. E (2016) Standardizing phenotype descriptors to support disease discovery and precision medicine. TBA Submitted

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hammond P, Suttie M (2012) Large-scale objective phenotyping of 3D facial morphology. Hum Mutat 33:817–825

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hansson M, Lochmüller H, Riess O et al (2016) The risk of re-identification versus the need to identify individuals in rare disease research. Eur J Hum Genet 24:1553–1558

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Hennekam R, Biesecker L (2012) Next-generation sequencing demands next-generation phenotyping. Hum Mutat 33:884–886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Holman C, Bass J, Rosman D et al (2008) A decade of data linkage in Western Australia: strategic design, applications and benefits of the WA data linkage system. Aust Health Rev 32:766–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. IRDiRC (2011) Summary of break out sessions 2011 April workshop. In: 2012 report on the state of the art of rare disease activities in Europe (eds) European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases (EUCERD). PART III: European Commission activities in the field of rare diseases. 2.3:35–37 Available from: http://www.eurordis.org/sites/default/files/2012ReportStateofArtRDActivitiesPart%203.pdf

  61. Jaffé A (2005) Editorial: orphan lung diseases in childhood: still unadopted? Thorax 60:892–894

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Jaffe A, Zurynski Y, Beville L et al (2009) Call for a national plan for rare diseases. J Paediatr Child Health 46:2–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Khoury M (2015) Planning for the future of epidemiology in the era of big data and precision medicine. Am J Epidemiol 182:977–979

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Khoury M, Evans J (2015) A public health perspective on a national precision medicine cohort : balancing long-term knowledge generation with early health benefit. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 313:2117–2118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Khoury M, Gwinn M, Yoon P et al (2007) The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention. Genet Med 9:665–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Khoury M, Iademarco M, Riley W (2016) Precision public health for the era of precision medicine. Am J Prev Med 50:398–401

    Google Scholar 

  67. Köhler S, Doelken S, Ruef B et al (2014) Construction and accessibility of a cross-species phenotype ontology along with gene annotations for biomedical research [version 2; referees: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2:30

    Google Scholar 

  68. Köhler S, Vasilevsky N, Engelstad M et al (2017) The human phenotype ontology in 2017. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D865–D876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lee IH, Lee K, Hsing M et al (2014) Prioritizing disease-linked variants, genes, and pathways with an interactive whole-genome analysis pipeline. Hum Mutat 35:537–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Lochmüller H, Le Cam Y, Jonker A et al (2016) IRDIRC Recognized Resources: a new mechanism to support scientists to conduct efficient, high-quality research for rare diseases. Eur J Hum Genet 25(2): 162–165, Published online 2016 Oct 26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.137

  71. Lochmüller H, Torrent i Farnell J, Le Cam Y, Jonker A, Lau L, Baynam G, Kaufmann P, Dawkins H, Lasko P, Austin C, Boycott KM, on behalf of the IRDiRC Consortium Assembly (2017) The international rare diseases research consortium: policies and guidelines to maximize impact. Eur J Hum Genet (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mallal S, Phillips E, Carosi G et al (2008) HLA-B*5701 screening for hypersensitivity to Abacavir. N Engl J Med 358:568–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Manrai A, Funke B, Rehm H et al (2016) Genetic misdiagnoses and the potential for health disparities. N Engl J Med 375:655–665

    Google Scholar 

  74. Mascalzoni D, Dove ES, Rubinstein Y et al (2015) International Charter of principles for sharing bio-specimens and data EJHG Open. Eur J Hum Genet Open: Policy 23:721–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Mascalzoni D, Knoppers B, Aymé S et al (2013) Rare diseases and now rare data? Nat Rev Genet 14:372

    Google Scholar 

  76. Mccormack P, Kole A, Gainotti S et al (2016) ‘You should at least ask’. The expectations, hopes and fears of rare disease patients on large-scale data and biomaterial sharing for genomics research. Eur J Hum Genet 24:1403–1408

    Google Scholar 

  77. Molster C, Maxwell S, Youngs L et al (2011) Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice? Health Expect 16:211–224. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00701.x

  78. Molster C, Maxwell S, Youngs L et al (2012) An Australian approach to the policy translation of deliberated citizen perspectives on biobanking. Public Health Genomics 15:82–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Molster C, Urwin D, Di Pietro L et al (2016) Survey of healthcare experiences of Australian adults living with rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis 11:30–41

    Google Scholar 

  80. Molster C, Youngs L, Hammond E et al (2012) Key outcomes from stakeholder workshops at a symposium to inform the development of an Australian national plan for rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis 7:50–59

    Google Scholar 

  81. Office of Population Health Genomics (2015) Western Australian rare diseases strategic framework 2015–2018. Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  82. Orphanet (2014) Linearisation rules for rare diseases, Orphanet procedural document. In: Reports collection. Orphanet Reports Collection, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  83. Orphanet (2017) Prevalence of rare diseases: bibliographic data. In: Orphanet report series – Contract No.1. Paris. Available from: http://www.orpha.net/orphacom/cahiers/docs/GB/Prevalence_of_rare_diseases_by_decreasing_prevalence_or_cases.pdf

  84. Philippakis P, Azzariti D, Beltran S et al (2015) The matchmaker exchange: a platform for rare disease gene discovery. Hum Mutat 36:915–921

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Posada de la Paz M, Groft S (2010) Rare disease epidemiology research. In: Advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol 686. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  86. Rath A, Olry A, Dhombres F et al (2012) Representation of rare diseases in health information systems: the Orphanet approach to serve a wide range of end users. Hum Mutat 33:803–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Retterer K, Juusola J, Cho MT et al (2016) Clinical application of whole-exome sequencing across clinical indications. Genet Med 18:678–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Riley W, Nilsen W, Manolio T et al (2015) News from the NIH: potential contributions of the behavioral and social sciences to the precision medicine initiative. Translat Behav Med 5:243–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Road Map Epigenomics Consortium, Kundaje A, Meuleman W et al (2015) Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Robinson PN (2012) Deep phenotyping for precision medicine. Hum Mutat 33:777–780

    Google Scholar 

  91. Robinson PN, Kohler S, Bauer S et al (2008) The human phenotype ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease. Am J Hum Genet 83:610–615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Robinson PN, Mundlos S (2010) The human phenotype ontology. Clin Genet 77:525–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Sawyer S, Hartley T, Dyment D et al (2016) Utility of whole-exome sequencing for those near the end of the diagnostic odyssey: time to address gaps in care. Clin Genet 89:275–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Shamseldin H, Maddirevula S, Faqeih E et al (2016) Increasing the sensitivity of clinical exome sequencing through improved filtration strategy. Genet Med 2017 May;19(5):593–598. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.155. Epub 2016 Oct 6

  95. Šimerka P (2009) Council Recommendation of 8 June 2009 on an action in the field of rare diseases. Off J Eur Union 2009/C 151/02:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  96. Smith C, Fullerton S, Dookeran K et al (2016) Using genetic technologies to reduce, rather than widen, health disparities. Health Aff 35:1367–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Sorensen G (2014) Diagnosis, misdiagnosis, and the value of knowing. Exploring the impact of early and accurate diagnosis. In: Siemens (ed). https://usa.healthcare.siemens.com/about-us/white-paper-diagnosis-misdiagnosis-value

  98. Tang D, Anderson D, Francis R et al (2016) Reference genotype and exome data from an Australian Aboriginal population for health-based research. Sci Data 3:160023

    Google Scholar 

  99. Taruscio D, Groft S, Cederroth H et al (2015) Undiagnosed Diseases Network International [UDNI]: white paper for global actions to meet patient needs. Mol Genet Metab 116:223–225

    Google Scholar 

  100. Taruscio D, Mantovani A, Carbone P et al (2015) Primary prevention of congenital anomalies: recommendable, feasible and achievable. Public Health Genomics 18:184–191

    Google Scholar 

  101. Thompson R, Johnston L, Taruscio D et al (2014) RD-connect: an integrated platform connecting databases, registries, biobanks and clinical bioinformatics for rare disease research. J Gen Intern Med 29:S780–S787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Topol E (2014) Individualized medicine from prewomb to tomb. Cell 157:241–253

    Google Scholar 

  103. UK Health Departments (2012) Consultation on the United Kingdom plan for rare diseases. Accessed: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/consultation-onthe-united-kingdom-plan-for-rare-diseases

  104. UK Health Departments (2013) The UK strategy for rare diseases. In: Deaprtment of Health, United Kingdom. Williams Lea, London

    Google Scholar 

  105. Valdez R, Ouyang L, Bolen J (2016) Public health and rare diseases: oxymoron no more. Preventing Chronic Disease. Public Health Research, Practice, and Policy 13:E05

    Google Scholar 

  106. Van Weely S, Leufkens H (2004) Background paper 6.19 rare diseases. In: Priority medicines for Europe and the World “a public health approach to innovation”. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  107. Vasant D, Chanas L, Malone J et al. (2014) ORDO: an ontology connecting rare disease, epidemiology and genetic data. Phenoday 2014. Available from: http://phenoday2014.bio-lark.org/pdf/9.pdf

  108. WA Register of Developmental Anomalies (2016) In: Baynam G (ed) Western Australian register of developmental anomalies 2016 (cited 2016 5th August 2016). Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth. Available from: http://www.kemh.health.wa.gov.au/services/register_developmental_anomalies/

  109. Walker CE, Mahede T, Davis G et al (2016) The collective impact of rare diseases in western Australia: an estimate using a population-based cohort. Genet Med 19:546–552. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.143

  110. Wilton S, Fletcher S (2011) RNA splicing manipulation: strategies to modify gene expression for a variety of therapeutic outcomes. Curr Gene Ther 11:259–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Yang Y, Muzny DM, Xia F et al (2014) Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 312:1870–1879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the individuals living with rare diseases and their families and all the involved genetic counsellors and clinical and research laboratory staff and the policy developers in the Public Health Division.

The Authors wish to acknowledge the leading role played by Dr. Ségolène Ayme over many years in raising the profile and helping to raise the awareness of rare diseases as a public health priority.

The authors acknowledge their involvement in the International Rare Disease Research Consortium (IRDiRC) and the support from The Western Australian Government Department of Health as part of its commitment to the goals of the IRDiRC. The authors gratefully acknowledge the combined financial support-in-part from the RD-Connect-European Union Seventh Framework Programme (HEALTH. 2012.2. 1.1-1-C) under grant agreement number 305444; RD Connect: An integrated platform connecting databases, registries, biobanks and clinical bioinformatics for rare disease research; and from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council APP1055319 under the NHMRC–European Union Collaborative Research Grants scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugh J. S. Dawkins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baynam, G. et al. (2017). Improved Diagnosis and Care for Rare Diseases through Implementation of Precision Public Health Framework. In: Posada de la Paz, M., Taruscio, D., Groft, S. (eds) Rare Diseases Epidemiology: Update and Overview. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1031. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics