Advertisement

A Cut-Free Cyclic Proof System for Kleene Algebra

  • Anupam Das
  • Damien Pous
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10501)

Abstract

We introduce a sound non-wellfounded proof system whose regular (or ‘cyclic’) proofs are complete for (in)equations between regular expressions. We achieve regularity by using hypersequents rather than usual sequents, with more structure in the succedent, and relying on the discreteness of rational languages to drive proof search. By inspection of the proof search space we extract a PSpace bound for the system, which is optimal for deciding such (in)equations.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, C.J., Foster, N., Guha, A., Jeannin, J.-B., Kozen, D., Schlesinger, C., Walker, D.: NetKAT: semantic foundations for networks. In: Proceedings of the POPL, pp. 113–126. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angus, A., Kozen, D.: Kleene algebra with tests and program schematology. Technical report TR2001-1844, CS Department, Cornell University, July 2001Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antimirov, V.M.: Partial derivatives of regular expressions and finite automaton constructions. TCS 155(2), 291–319 (1996)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonchi, F., Pous, D.: Checking NFA equivalence with bisimulations up to congruence. In: Proceedings of the POPL, pp. 457-468. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braibant, T., Pous, D.: An efficient Coq tactic for deciding Kleene algebras. In: Kaufmann, M., Paulson, L.C. (eds.) ITP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6172, pp. 163–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14052-5_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brotherston, J., Simpson, A.: Sequent calculi for induction and infinite descent. J. Log. Comput. 21(6), 1177–1216 (2011)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brünnler, K., Studer, T.: Syntactic cut-elimination for common knowledge. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 160(1), 82–95 (2009)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brünnler, K., Studer, T.: Syntactic cut-elimination for a fragment of the modal \(\mu \)-calculus. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 163(12), 1838–1853 (2012)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buss, S.R.: An introduction to proof theory. Handb. Proof Theory 137, 1–78 (1998)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buszkowski, W.: On action logic: equational theories of action algebras. J. Log. Comput. 17(1), 199–217 (2007)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conway, J.H.: Regular Algebra and Finite Machines. Chapman and Hall, London (1971)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Das, A., Pous, D.: A cut-free cyclic proof system for Kleene algebra (2017). Full version of this extended abstract, with appendix https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01558132/
  13. 13.
    Dax, C., Hofmann, M., Lange, M.: A proof system for the linear time \(\mu \)-calculus. In: Arun-Kumar, S., Garg, N. (eds.) FSTTCS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4337, pp. 273–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi: 10.1007/11944836_26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dershowitz, N., Manna, Z.: Proving termination with multiset orderings. Commun. ACM 22(8), 465–476 (1979)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doumane, A., Baelde, D., Hirschi, L., Saurin, A.: Towards completeness via proof search in the linear time \(\mu \)-calculus: the case of Büchi inclusions. In: Proceedings of the LICS, pp. 377–386. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Girard, J.-Y.: Linear logic. TCS 50, 1–102 (1987)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoare, C.A.R.T., Möller, B., Struth, G., Wehrman, I.: Concurrent Kleene algebra. In: Bravetti, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) CONCUR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5710, pp. 399–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04081-8_27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hopcroft, J.E., Karp, R.M.: A linear algorithm for testing equivalence of finite automata. Technical report 114, Cornell University (1971)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jipsen, P.: From semirings to residuated Kleene lattices. Studia Logica 76(2), 291–303 (2004)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kleene, S.C.: Representation of events in nerve nets and finite automata. In: Automata Studies, pp. 3–41. Princeton University Press (1956)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kozen, D.: A completeness theorem for Kleene algebras and the algebra of regular events. In: Proceedings of the LICS, pp. 214–225. IEEE (1991)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kozen, D.: On action algebras. In: van Eijck, J., Visser, A. (eds.) Logic and Information Flow, pp. 78–88. MIT Press (1994)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kozen, D.: Kleene algebra with tests. Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 19(3), 427–443 (1997)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kozen, D.: On Hoare logic and Kleene algebra with tests. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 1(1), 60–76 (2000)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kozen, D., Patron, M.-C.: Certification of compiler optimizations using Kleene algebra with tests. In: Lloyd, J., et al. (eds.) CL 2000. LNCS, vol. 1861, pp. 568–582. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). doi: 10.1007/3-540-44957-4_38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krauss, A., Nipkow, T.: Proof pearl: regular expression equivalence and relation algebra. JAR 49(1), 95–106 (2012)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krob, D.: A complete system of B-rational identities. In: Paterson, M.S. (ed.) ICALP 1990. LNCS, vol. 443, pp. 60–73. Springer, Heidelberg (1990). doi: 10.1007/BFb0032022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Krob, D.: Complete systems of B-rational identities. TCS 89(2), 207–343 (1991)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lambek, J.: The mathematics of sentence structure. Am. Math. Monthly 65, 154–170 (1958)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Palka, E.: An infinitary sequent system for the equational theory of *-continuous action lattices. Fundam. Inform. 295-309 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pous, D.: Kleene algebra with tests and coq tools for while programs. In: Blazy, S., Paulin-Mohring, C., Pichardie, D. (eds.) ITP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7998, pp. 180–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39634-2_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pratt, V.: Action logic and pure induction. In: Eijck, J. (ed.) JELIA 1990. LNCS, vol. 478, pp. 97–120. Springer, Heidelberg (1991). doi: 10.1007/BFb0018436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schütte, K.: Proof Theory. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 225. Sprigner, Heidelberg (1977). Translation of Beweistheorie, 1968MATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wurm, C.: Kleene algebras, regular languages and substructural logics. In: Proceedings of the GandALF, EPTCS, pp. 46–59 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Univ. Lyon, CNRS, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, LIPLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations