Advertisement

How Gamification Is Being Implemented in MOOCs? A Systematic Literature Review

  • Alejandro Ortega-ArranzEmail author
  • Juan A. Muñoz-Cristóbal
  • Alejandra Martínez-Monés
  • Miguel L. Bote-Lorenzo
  • Juan I. Asensio-Pérez
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10474)

Abstract

Although MOOCs are being established as a very popular technology to support learning, they are often criticized for their lack of support to active pedagogies and the high drop-out rates. One approach to face this problem is gamification, due to the promising benefits already shown at small-scale environments. Attending to the current and growing use of game elements in MOOCs, this paper presents a systematic literature review of the usage of gamification in MOOCs, aimed at analyzing how gamification is being implemented in MOOCs, and to identify unexplored research opportunities in this field. The results show that gamification is still at an early stage in MOOCs, and it is being implemented in similar ways to those at small scale contexts.

Keywords

Gamification MOOCs Literature review Game elements 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been partially supported by the Junta de Castilla y León (VA082U16) and Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (TIN2014-53199-C3-2-R). The authors thank the GSIC-EMIC research team for their ideas and support and the “Movilidad Doctorandos UVa 2017” grant program.

References

  1. 1.
    Caponetto, I., Earp, J., Ott, M.: Gamification and education: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Games Based Learning, pp. 50–57 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang, J.W., Wei, H.Y.: Exploring engaging gamification mechanics in massive online open courses. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19(2), 177–203 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cross, S., Whitelock, D., Galley, R.: The use, role and reception of open badges as a method for formative and summative reward in two Massive Open Online Courses. Int. J. e-Assess. 4(1) (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Sousa Borges, S., Durelli, V., Reis, H., Isotani, S.: A systematic mapping on gamification applied to education. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 216–222. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Academic MindTrek Conference on Envisioning Future Media Environments, pp. 9–15 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dichev, C., Dicheva, D.: Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 14(1), 9 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., Angelova, G.: Gamification in education: a systematic mapping study. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18(3), 75–88 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H.: Does gamification work?-a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: Proceedings of 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3025–3034. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hansch, A., Newman, C., Schildhauer, T.: Fostering engagement with gamification: review of current practices on online learning platforms. HIIG Discussion Paper Series (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jacoby, J.: The disruptive potential of the massive open online course: a literature review. J. Open Flex. Distance Learn. 18(1), 73–85 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jordan, K.: Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 15(1) (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khalil, H., Ebner, M.: MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention-a literature review. In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, vol. 1, pp. 1305–1313 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A., Williams, S.A.: MOOCs: a systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 14(3), 202–227 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robertson, M.: Can’t play, won’t play. Hide & Seek 6 (2010). http://kotaku.com/5686393/cant-play-wont-play. Accessed June 2017
  16. 16.
    Veletsianos, G., Shepherdson, P.: A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013–2015. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 17(2) (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yuan, L., Powell, S.: MOOCs and open education: implications for higher education (2013). http://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf. Accessed Jan 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alejandro Ortega-Arranz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juan A. Muñoz-Cristóbal
    • 1
  • Alejandra Martínez-Monés
    • 1
  • Miguel L. Bote-Lorenzo
    • 1
  • Juan I. Asensio-Pérez
    • 1
  1. 1.GSIC-EMIC Research GroupUniversidad de ValladolidValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations