Advertisement

One Tablet, Multiple Epistemic Instruments in the Everyday Classroom

Conference paper
  • 3k Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10474)

Abstract

Grounded in the analyses of 23 semi-structured interviews and 31 field notes from classroom observations, this study scrutinizes the relationships that teachers and learners entertain with/through the tablet in their process of technology appropriation in the classroom. The results reveal that, on the one hand, the learners elaborate a variety of instruments from their interactions with the tablet and, on the other hand, that the teachers’ appropriation plays a central role in configuring a creative, critical and participatory pedagogy in the contemporary classroom.

Keywords

Appropriation Instrumental genesis Tablets School classrooms Teaching practices Learning activities 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the teachers, learners and school principals who participated in the study and we are grateful to the Swedish Research Council for funding this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Sörensen, E.: The Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murray, O.T., Olcese, N.R.: Teaching and learning with iPads, ready or not? TechTrends 55(6), 42–48 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kucirkova, N., Messer, D., Sheehy, S., Fernández Panadero, C.: Children’s engagement with educational iPad apps: insights from a Spanish classroom. Comput. Educ. 71, 175–184 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fallon, G.: What’s the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Comput. Educ. 84, 62–77 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sung, T., Chang, K., Liu, T.: The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis and research synthesis. Comput. Educ. 94, 252–275 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Outhwaite, L., Gulliford, A., Pitchford, N.: Closing the gap: efficacy of a tablet intervention to support the development of early mathematical skills in UK primary school children. Comput. Educ. 108, 43–58 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nordmark, S., Milrad, M.: Influencing everyday teacher practices by applying mobile digital storytelling as a seamless learning approach. In: Brown, T.H., van der Merwe, H.J. (eds.) mLearn 2015. CCIS, vol. 560, pp. 256–272. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25684-9_19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nouri, J., Cerratto Pargman, T., Eliasson, J., Ramberg, R.: Exploring the challenges of supporting collaborative mobile learning. Int. J. Mob. Blended Learn. 3(4), 54–69 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nouri, J., Pargman, T.C.: When teaching practices meet tablets’ affordances. Insights on the materiality of learning. In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds.) EC-TEL 2016. LNCS, vol. 9891, pp. 179–192. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cerratto Pargman, T., Nouri, J.: Tablets in the CSCL classroom: a lens on teachers’ instrumental geneses. In: Proceedings of CSCL 2017, Philadelphia. ISLS Press (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lonchamp, J.: An instrumental perspective on CSCL systems. Int. J. CSCL 7(2), 211–237 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ritella, G., Hakkarainen, K.: Instrumental genesis in technology-mediated learning: from double stimulation to expansive knowledge practices. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 7(2), 239–258 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stahl, G., Ludvigsen, S., Law, N., Cress, U.: CSCL artifacts. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 9(3), 237 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stahl, G.: Cognizing mediating: unpacking the entanglement of artifacts with collective minds. Int. J. CSCL 7(2), 187–191 (2012)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Overdijk, M., van Diggelen, W., Kirschner, P.A., Baker, M.: Connecting agents with artifacts. Towards a rationale of mutual shaping. Int. J. CSCL 7(2), 193–210 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cerratto-Pargman, T., Knutsson, O., Karlström, P.: Materiality of online students’ peer-review activities in higher education. In: Proceedings of CSCL 2015, Gothenburg, pp. 308–315. ICLS Press (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Malley, C., Suthers, D., Reimann, P., Dimitracopoulou, A.: Computer-supported collaborative learning practices. In: Conference Proceedings CSCL 2009. ISLS (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rabardel, P.: Les hommes et les technologies: approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Colin, Paris (1995)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittani, M., boyd, d, Cody, R., Stephson, B., Horst, H.: Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living AND Learning WITH New Media. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jewitt, C.: Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Rev. Res. Educ. 32(1), 241–267 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushtoma, R., Robison, A., Weigel, M.: Confronting the Challenges of a Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. McArthur Foundation, Chicago (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations