A Manifesto for Conscientious Design of Hybrid Online Social Systems

  • Pablo NoriegaEmail author
  • Harko Verhagen
  • Mark d’Inverno
  • Julian Padget
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10315)


Online Social Systems such as community forums, social media, e-commerce and gaming are having an increasingly significant impact on our lives. They affect the way we accomplish all sorts of collective activities, the way we relate to others, and the way we construct are own self-image. These systems often have both human and artificial agency creating what we call online hybrid social systems. However, when systems are designed and constructed, the psychological and sociological impact of such systems on individuals and communities is not always worked out in advance. We see this as a significant challenge for which coordination, organisations, institutions and norms are core resources and we would like to make a call to arms researchers in these topics to subscribe a conscientious approach to that challenge.

In this paper we identify a class of design issues that need attention when designing hybrid online social systems and propose to address those problems using conscientious design which is underpinned by ethical and social values. We present an austere framework to articulate those notions and illustrate these ideas with an example. We outline five lines of research that we see worth pursuing.



The authors wish to acknowledge the support of SINTELNET (FET Open Coordinated Action FP7-ICT-2009-C Project No. 286370). This research was partially supported by project MILESS (MINECO TIN2013-45039-P).


  1. 1.
    Aldewereld, H., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Noriega, P., Padget, J.: Social Coordination Frameworks for Social Technical Systems. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol. 30. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-33570-4 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brey, P.: Values in technology and disclosive computer ethics. In: Floridi, L. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, pp. 41–58. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castelfranchi, C.: InMind and OutMind; societal order cognition and self-organization: the role of MAS. Invited Talk for the IFAAMAS “Influential Paper Award”, AAMAS 2013, Saint Paul, MN, US.
  4. 4.
    Christiaanse, R., Ghose, A., Noriega, P., Singh, M.P.: Characterizing artificial socio-cognitive technical systems. In: Herzig, A., Lorini, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Social Intelligence (ECSI 2014), Barcelona, Spain. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1283, pp. 336–346., 3–5 November 2014Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collingridge, D.: The Social Control of Technology. St. Martin’s Press, London (1980)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    d’Inverno, M., Luck, M., Noriega, P., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C.: Communicating open systems. Artif. Intell. 186, 38–94 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Floridi, L. (ed.): The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friedman, B. (ed.): Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galliers, J.R.: The positive role of conflicts in cooperative multi-agent systems. In: Demazeau, Y., Mueller, J.-P. (eds.) Decentralized AI: Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-agent World. Elsevier (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones, A.J.I., Artikis, A., Pitt, J.: The design of intelligent socio-technical systems. Artif. Intell. Rev. 39(1), 5–20 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knobel, C.P., Bowker, G.C.: Values in design. Commun. ACM 54(7), 26–28 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koster, A., Madrenas, J., Osman, N., Schorlemmer, M., Sabater-Mir, J., Sierra, C., de Jonge, D., Fabregues, A., Puyol-Gruart, J., García, P.: u-Help: supporting helpful communities with information technology. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Agreement Technologies (AT 2012), Dubrovnik, Croatia, vol. 918, pp. 378–392, 15 October 2012Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noriega, P., Chopra, A.K., Fornara, N., Cardoso, H.L., Singh, M.P.: Regulated MAS: social perspective. In: Andrighetto, G., Governatori, G., Noriega, P., van der Torre, L.W.N. (eds.) Normative Multi-Agent Systems. Dagstuhl Follow-Ups, vol. 4, pp. 93–133. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noriega, P., Padget, J., Verhagen, H., d’Inverno, M.: Towards a framework for socio-cognitive technical systems. In: Ghose, A., Oren, N., Telang, P., Thangarajah, J. (eds.) COIN 2014. LNCS, vol. 9372, pp. 164–181. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25420-3_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osman, N., Sierra, C.: A roadmap for self-evolving communities. In: Herzig, A., Lorini, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Social Intelligence (ECSI 2014), Barcelona, Spain. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1283, pp. 305–316., 3–5 November 2014Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phillips, W.: LOLing at tragedy: Facebook trolls, memorial pages and resistance to grief online. First Monday 16(12) (2011).
  17. 17.
    Pitt, J., Busquets, D., Macbeth, S.: Distributive justice for self-organised common-pool resource management. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 9(3), 14 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Searle, J.R.: What is an institution? J. Inst. Econ. 1(01), 1–22 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh, M.P.: Norms as a basis for governing sociotechnical systems. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 5(1), 21:1–21:23 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trist, E.: The evolution of socio-technical systems. Occasional Paper, Ontario Ministry of Labour, 2 (1981)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo Noriega
    • 1
    Email author
  • Harko Verhagen
    • 2
  • Mark d’Inverno
    • 3
  • Julian Padget
    • 4
  1. 1.IIIA-CSICBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Goldsmiths, University of LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations