Advertisement

Advances in In-Situ Ocean Measurements

  • David Murphy
  • Carol Janzen
Chapter
Part of the Springer Oceanography book series (SPRINGEROCEAN)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on recent advances in in-situ ocean measurements. Recent interest in the ocean’s response to and impact on climate change has encouraged the development of improved sensor technologies for measuring oceanic parameters such as conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH. It introduces various sensors used for measuring oceanic parameters, the underlying principles of these sensors and their respective calibration parameters. It also discusses what is still needed in the development of sensors to achieve the oceanographic need.

References

  1. 1.
    Assmann S, Fram C, Koertzinger A (2011) Spectrophotometric high-precision seawater pH determinations for use in underway measuring systems. Ocean Sci 7:597–607.  https://doi.org/10.5194/os-7-597-2011. https://www.ocean-sci.net/7/597/2011/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bacon S, Culkin F, Higgs N, Ridout P (2007) IAPSO standard seawater: definition of the uncertainty in the calibration procedure, and stability of recent batches. J Atmos Ocean Technol 24(10):1785–1799.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH.20811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bittig HC, Fiedler B, Scholz R, Krahmann G, Körtzinger A (2014) Time response of oxygen optodes on profiling platforms and its dependence on flow speed and temperature. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 12(2014):617–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bresnahan J, Philip J, Martz TR, Takeshita Y, Johnson KS, LaShomb M (2014) Best practices for autonomous measurement of seawater pH with the Honeywell Durafet. Methods Oceanography 9:44–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark LC (1959) Electrochemical device for chemical analysis, US Patent 2,913,386, issued 17 Nov 1959Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dickson AG (2010) Standards for ocean measurements. Oceanography 23:34–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edwards B, Janzen C, Murphy D, Larson N (2010) Calibration, response and hysteresis in Deep-Sea dissolved oxygen measurements. J Atmos Ocean Technol 27(5):920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruber N, Doney SC, Emerson SR, Gilbert D, Kobayashi T, Körtzinger A, Johnson GC, Johnson KS, Riser SC, Ulloa O (2007) The ARGO-oxygen program – a white paper to promotethe addition of oxygen sensors to the international Argo float program. Supporting documents for the 8th meeting of the International Argo Steering Team, pages 40–99Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson KS, Jannasch HW, Coletti LJ, Elrod VA, Martz TR, Takeshita Y, Carlson RJ, Connery JJ (2016) Deep-Sea DuraFET: a pressure tolerant pH sensor designed for global sensor networks. Anal Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04653
  10. 10.
    Kapsenberg L, Hofmann GE (2016) Ocean pH time-series and drivers of variability along the northern Channel Islands, California, USA. Limnol Oceanogr 61(3):953–968.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10264
  11. 11.
    Kapsenberg L, Kelley AL, Shaw EC, Martz TR, Hofmann GE (2015) Near-shore Antarctic pH variability has implications for the design of ocean acidification experiments. Sci Rep 5:9638. (9 p) http://www.nature.com/scientificreports.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Langdon C (2010) Determination of dissolved oxygen in seawater by Winkler titration using the amperometric technique, IOCCP Report No. 14, ICPO Publication Series No. 134, Version 1Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martz TR, Carr JJ, French CR, DeGrandpre MD (2003) A submersible autonomous sensor for spectrophotometric pH measurements of natural waters. Anal Chem 75:1844–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martz TR, Daly KL, Byrne RH, Stillman JH, Turk D (2015) Technology for ocean acidification research: needs and availability. Oceanography 28(20):40–47.  https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2015.30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Newton JA, Feely RA, Jewett EB, Williamson P, Mathis J (2015) Global Ocean Acidification Observing Network: Requirements and Governance Plan, 2nd edn, October 2015. http://www.goa-on.org/docs/GOA-ON_2nd_edition_final.pdf
  16. 16.
    Royer TC, Grosch CE (2006) Ocean warming and freshening in the northern gulf of Alaska. Geophys Res Lett 33:L16605.  https://doi.org/10.1029/GL.026767 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seidel MP, DeGrandpre MD, Dickson AG (2008) A sensor for in-situ indicator-based measurements of seawater pH. Mar Chem 109:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Woias P, Meixner L, Amandi D, Schönberger M (1995) Modelling the short-time response of ISFET sensors. Sensors Actuators B Chem 24(1–3):211–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4005(95)85045-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sea-Bird ScientificBellevueUSA
  2. 2.The Alaska Ocean Observing SystemAnchorageUSA

Personalised recommendations