Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Procedure Planning and Guidance

  • Eric Brochet
  • Christopher Meduri
  • Vivek Rajagopal
  • Sarah Rinehart


The role of non-invasive imaging for trans-catheter implant (TAVI) has increasingly been in procedure planning rather than peri-procedural imaging. With maturation of TAVI, there is movement to avoid general anaesthesia during the procedure, and rely mostly on fluoroscopy or a combination of trans-thoracic Echocardiography (TTE) and fluoroscopy. Accordingly, the emphasis is on optimal procedural planning to prevent peri-valvular leak (PVL) and complications such as annular rupture, and to establish the options for procedural access by evaluation of the vasculature. Thus, the following section will describe the role of imaging for TAVI planning followed by key steps for intra-procedural imaging.


  1. 1.
    Jabbour A, Ismail TF, Moat N, et al. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2165–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:2440–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garbi M, Chambers J, Vannan MA, Lancellotti P. Valve stress echocardiography: a practical guide for referral, procedure, reporting, and clinical implementation of results from the HAVEC Group. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:724–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garcia J, Capoulade R, Le VF, et al. Discrepancies between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography in the measurement of transvalvular gradient in aortic stenosis: the effect of flow vorticity. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dulgheru R, Pibarot P, Sengupta PP, et al. Multimodality imaging strategies for the assessment of aortic stenosis: viewpoint of the Heart Valve Clinic International Database (HAVEC) Group. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e004352. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2079–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hahn RT. Transcathether valve replacement and valve repair: review of procedures and intraprocedural echocardiographic imaging. Circ Res. 2016;119:341–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Calleja A, Thavendiranathan P, Ionasec RI, et al. Automated quantitative 3-dimensional modeling of the aortic valve and root by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in normals, aortic regurgitation, and aortic stenosis: comparison to computed tomography in normals and clinical implications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kasel AM, Cassese S, Bleiziffer S, et al. Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:249–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansson NC, Norgaard BL, Barbanti M, et al. The impact of calcium volume and distribution in aortic root injury related to balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015;9:382–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qian Z, Lancellotti P, Vannan MA. Aortic root calcium burden and post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation paravalvular leak: Can’t Live Without It, Can’t Live With It. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:654–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Binder RK, Leipsic J, Wood D, et al. Prediction of optimal deployment projection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: angiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic root versus multidetector computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:247–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zamorano JL, Badano LP, Bruce C, Chan KL, Goncalves A, Hahn RT, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zamorano J, Gonçalves A, Lancellotti P, et al. The use of imaging in new transcatheter interventions: an EACVI review paper. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(8):835–835af. pii: jew043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bloomfield GS, Gillam LD, Hahn RT, Kapadia S, Leipsic J, Lerakis S, et al. A practicalguide to multimodality imaging of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:441–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hahn RT, Little S, Monaghan MJ, et al. Recommendations for comprehensive intraprocedural echocardiographic imaging during TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:261–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sengupta P, Wiley B, Basnet S, et al. Transthoracicechocardiography guidance for TAVR under monitored anesthesia care. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:379–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bartel T, Edris A, Velik-Salchner C, Müller S. Intracardiac echocardiography for guidance of transcatheter aortic valve implantation under monitored sedation: a solution to a dilemma? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ng AC, Delgado V, van der Kley F, et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometriesbefore and after transcatheter aortic valveimplantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislicecomputed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bagur R, Rodés-Cabau J, Doyle D, et al. Usefulness of TEE as the primary imaging technique to guide transcatheter transapical aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hahn RT, Gillam LD, Little SH, et al. Echocardiographic imaging of procedural complications during self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:319–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Détaint D, Lepage L, Himbert D, et al. Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aorticvalve implantation: impact of device and annulus discongruence. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:821–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eggebrecht H, Doss M, Schmermund A, Nowak B, Krissel J, Voigtlander T. Interventional options for severe aortic regurgitation aftertranscatheter aortic valve implantation: balloons, snares, valve-in-valve. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012;101:503–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Genereux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1438–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pibarot P, Hahn RT, Weissman NJ, Monaghan MJ. Assessment of paravalvular regurgitationfollowing TAVR: a proposal of unifying grading scheme. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:340–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sinning JM, et al. Aortic regurgitation index defines severity of peri-prostheticregurgitation and predicts outcomein patients after transcatheter aorticvalve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1134–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pasic M, Unbehaun A, Buz S, Drews T, Hetzer R. Annular rupture during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: classification, pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatment approaches, and prevention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Genereux P, Reiss GR, Kodali SK, et al. Periaortic hematoma after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: description of a newcomplication. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;79:766–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Brochet
    • 1
  • Christopher Meduri
    • 2
  • Vivek Rajagopal
    • 2
  • Sarah Rinehart
    • 2
  1. 1.Cardiology DepartmentHôpital BICHATParisFrance
  2. 2.Marcus Heart Valve Center, Piedmont Heart InstituteAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations