Novel Linear Prediction Temporal Phase Based Features for Speaker Recognition

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10458)


This paper proposes novel features based on linear prediction of temporal phase (LPTP) for speaker recognition task. The proposed LPTC feature vector represents Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) (for energy compaction and decorrelation) coefficients of LP spectrum derived from temporal phase of speech signal. The results are shown on standard NIST 2002 SRE and GMM-UBM (Gaussian Mixture Modeling-Universal Background Modeling) approach. A recently proposed supervised score-level fusion method is used for combining evidences of Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) and proposed feature set. Performance of proposed feature set is compared with state-of-the-art MFCC features. It is evident from the results that proposed features gives 4% improvement in % identification rate and 2% decrement in % EER than that of standard MFCC alone. In addition, when the supervised score-level fusion is used, identification rate improves 8% and EER is decreased by 2% indicating that proposed feature captures complimentary information than MFCC alone.


Linear prediction (LP) spectrum Temporal phase Speaker recognition Score-level fusion 


  1. 1.
    Kinnunen, T., Li, H.: An overview of text-independent speaker recognition: from features to supervectors. Speech Commun. 52(1), 12–40 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis, S.B., Mermelstein, P.: Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Sig. Process. ASSP 28, 357–366 (1980)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Makhoul, J.: Linear prediction: a tutorial review. Proc. IEEE 63(4), 561–580 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, Q., Huang, Y.: Robust speaker identification using an auditory based feature. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Process (ICASSP), Dallas, Texas, pp. 4514–4517 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shi, G., Shanechi, M.M., Aarabi, P.: On the importance of phase in human speech recognition. Symp. IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech Lang. process. 14, 1867–1874 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hegde, R.M., Murthy, H.A., Rao, G.V.R.: Application of the modified group delay function to speaker identification and discrimination. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Process (ICASSP), Montreal, Canada, pp. 517–520 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vijayan, K., Kumar, V., Murthy, K.S.R: Feature extraction from analytic phase of speech signal. In: Proceedings of INTERSPEECH, Singapore, pp. 1658–1662 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murty, K.S.R., Yegnanarayana, B.: Combining evidence from residual phase and MFCC features for speaker recognition. IEEE Sig. Process. Lett. 13, 52–56 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agrawal, P., Patil, H.A.: Fusion of TEO phase with MFCC features for speaker recognition. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Perception and Machine Intelligence (PerMin), pp. 161–166 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vijayan, K., Kumar, V., Murty, K.S.R.: Allpass modelling of Fourier phase for speaker verication. In: Proceedings of ODYSSEY: The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 112–117 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vijayan K., Murthy, K.S.R.: Epoch Extraction From Allpass residual of speech signals. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 1493–1497 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    NIST 2002 Speaker Recognition Evaluation. Last Accessed 20 Apr 2017
  13. 13.
    Reynolds, D.A., Quatieri, T.F., Dunn, R.B.: Speaker verification using adapted Gaussian mixture models. Digit. Signal Proc. 10, 19–41 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MSR identity toolkit, Microsoft research (2013). Last Accessed 28 Mar 2017
  15. 15.
    Pelaez-Moreno, C., Gallardo-Antolin, A., Diaz-de-Maria, F.: Recognizing voice over IP: a robust front-end for speech recognition on the world wide web. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 3(2), 209–218 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin, A., Doddington, G., Kamm, T., Ordowski, M.: The DET curve in assessment of detection task performance. In: European Conference on Speech Processing Technology, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 1895–1898 (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mike Brookes: VOICEBOX: Speech Processing Toolbox for MATLAB (2014). Last Accessed 2 Apr 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Infinium Solutionz Pvt LtdAhmedabadIndia
  2. 2.Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information Communication and TechnologyGandhinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations