Advertisement

Social Dialogue as a Sustainable Career Development Practice to Combat (Meta)Stereotyping

  • Pascale PetersEmail author
  • Beatrice Van der Heijden
  • Daniel Spurk
  • Ans de Vos
  • Renate Klaassen
Chapter
Part of the Industrial Relations & Conflict Management book series (IRCM)

Abstract

Sustainable Human Resource Management (HRM) implies individuals and organizations to share responsibility for workers’ employability, including vulnerable workers, such as older workers (> 50 years). Witnessing the emerging scholarly and societal attention for sustainable career development (SCD), this chapter outlines how the concepts of social dialogue, employability, and (meta)stereotyping may be conceptualized and interrelated, and how they can play a role in HR-processes and, ultimately, affect workers’ career development. The (meta)stereotyping process is illustrated by a short summary of preliminary results from a study of supermarket workers in the Netherlands, particularly focusing on workers engaging in negative age-based (meta)stereotyping. In view of several interrelated trends, older workers (among others) have become an increasingly vulnerable labor market category. The chapter concludes by suggesting organizations to implement HR practices to combat negative (meta)stereotyping in general, and older workers in particular, enabling them to shape more inclusive workplaces, for example, through social dialogue.

References

  1. Bryson, A., Forth, J., & George, A. (2012). Workplace social dialogue in Europe: An analysis of the European Company Survey 2009. Dublin: Eurofound.Google Scholar
  2. De Lange, W., & Koppens, J. (2007). De duurzame arbeidsorganisatie: Een geloofwaardig vervolg op maatschappelijk verantwoord ondernemen. Amsterdam: WEKA Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
  3. De Lange, A. H., Kooij, D. T. A. M., & Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2015). Human resource management and sustainability at work across the lifespan: An integrative perspective. In L. M. Finkelstein, D. M. Truxillo, F. Fraccaroli, & R. Kanfer (Eds.), Facing the challenges of a multi-age workforce: A use-inspired approach (pp. 50–79). SIOP Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. De Prins, P., De Vos, A., Van Beirendonck, L., & Segers, J. (2015). Sustainable HRM for sustainable careers: Introducing the ‘Respect Openness Continuity (ROC) model’. In A. De Vos & B. I. J. M. Van der Heijden (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable careers (pp. 319–334). Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, USA: Edgar Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Vos, A., De Hauw, S., & Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2011). Competency development and career success: The mediating role of employability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 438–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Vos, A., Dujardin, J. M., Gielens, T., & Meyers, C. (2016). Developing sustainable careers across the lifespan: European Social Fund network on “Career and AGE (Age, Generations, Experience). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dordoni, P., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Peters, P., Kraus-Hoogeveen, S., & Argentero, P. (in progress). Keep up the good work! Towards an age-moderated mediation model predicting intention to retire.Google Scholar
  8. Euwema, M., Munduate, L., Elgoibar, P., Pender, E., & Garcia, A. (2015). Promoting social dialogue in European organizations. Human Resources management and constructive conflict management. Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Finkelstein, L. M., Ryan, K. M., & King, E. B. (2013). What do the young (old) people think of me? Content and accuracy of age-based metastereotypes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 633–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Froehlich, D. E., Beausaert, S. A. J., & Segers, M. S. R. (2015). Great expectations: The relationship between future time perspective, learning from others, and employability. Vocations and Learning, 8, 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henkens, C. J. I. M. (2005). Stereotyping older workers and retirement: The managers’ point of view. Canadian Journal of Aging, 24, 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. King, E. B., Kaplan, S., & Zaccaro, S. (2008). Metaperceptions in diverse workgroups: Intrapersonal perspectives and intragroup processes. In B. Mannix, M. Neale, & C. Anderson (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 109–142). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. Kunze, F., Boehm, S., & Bruch, H. (2011). Age diversity, age discrimination, and performance consequences. A cross organizational study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 264–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawrence, B. S., Hall, D. T., & Arthur, M. B. (2015). Sustainable careers then and now. In A. De Vos & B. I. J. M. Van der Heijden (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable careers (pp. 432–449). Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, USA: Edgar Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nahavandhi, A., Denhardt, R.B., Denhardt, J.V., & Aristigueta, M.P. (2015). Organizational Behavior, First Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Nauta, A. (2015). Industrial relations and works councils in the Netherlands—Results from interviews and a survey among HR managers. In M. Euwema, L. Munduate, P. Elgoibar, E. Pender, & A. Garcia (Eds.), Promoting social dialogue in European organizations. Human Resources management and constructive conflict management (pp. 105–121). Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Owuamalam, C. K., & Zagefka, H. (2014). On the psychological barriers to the workplace: When and why metastereotyping undermines employability beliefs of women and ethnic minorities. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(4), 521–528.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Peters, P., & Lam, W. (2015). Can employability do the trick? Revealing paradoxical tensions and responses in the process of adopting innovative employability enhancing policies and practices in organizations. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 29(3–4), 235–258.Google Scholar
  20. Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37, 1262–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van der Heijde, C. M., & Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2006). A competence-based and multi-dimensional operationalization and measurement of employability. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 449–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2002). Prerequisites to guarantee life-long employability. Personal Review, 31(1), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2005). No one has ever promised you a rose garden” On shared responsibility and employability enhancing strategies throughout careers. Heerlen, the Netherlands, Open University of the Netherlands. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  24. Van Vuuren, T. (2012). Vitaliteitsmanagement: je hoeft niet ziek te zijn om beter te worden! Vergroot de duurzame inzetbaarheid van werknemers door hun vitaliteit, werkvermogen en employability te versterken [Vitality management: You don’t have to be ill to get better! Enlarge the sustainable labour participation of workers by strengthening their vitality, work ability and employability]. Gedrag & Organisatie, 25(4), 400–418.Google Scholar
  25. Vauclair, C. M., Lima, M. L., Abrams, D., Swift, H. J., & Bratt, C. (2016). What do older people think that others think of them, and does it matter? The role of meta-perceptions and social norms in the prediction of perceived age discrimination. Psychology and Aging, 31(7), 699–710.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Vorauer, J. D., Main, K. J., & O’Connell, G. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of metastereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 917–937.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2007). Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. CAHRS Working Paper Series. Paper 468. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1469&context=cahrswp.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pascale Peters
    • 1
    Email author
  • Beatrice Van der Heijden
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Daniel Spurk
    • 4
  • Ans de Vos
    • 5
    • 6
  • Renate Klaassen
    • 7
  1. 1.Institute for Management Research (IMR)/GAINS, Radboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Open University of the NetherlandsHeerlenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Kingston UniversityLondonUK
  4. 4.Bern UniversityBernSwitzerland
  5. 5.Antwerp Management SchoolAntwerpBelgium
  6. 6.University of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  7. 7.Radboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations