Advertisement

Responsible Investment Requires a Proxy Voting System Responsive to Retail Investors

  • Ian Robertson
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth book series (PSSBAFE)

Abstract

There is growing awareness amongst retail investors of the importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors to the performance of their stocks. The same factors impact their lives from a broader societal and economic perspective. Institutional investors have incorporated ESG issues into their proxy voting and corporate engagement. Retail investors who invest in stocks directly have the same voting rights, and collectively a similar power, but data shows that their voting rates have declined precipitously over the past forty years. This chapter traces the history of property rights and proxy voting, examines them within the current regulatory context, and posits that economic rights have been well protected but ownership rights have been neglected. An established framework for stages of capitalism is re-imagined, situating retail investors’ disengagement from the proxy process and highlighting suggestions to regulators for addressing the proxy voting gap.

References

  1. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000). Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. Journal of Finance, LV(2), 773–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2011). The behavior of individual investors. Social Sciences Research Network, 1–54. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1872211
  4. Baumol, W. J., Litan, R. E., & Schramm, C. J. (2007). Good capitalism, bad capitalism, and the economics of growth and prosperity (On-line). New Haven/London: Yale University Press. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=985843
  5. Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003769204362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beller, A. L., Fisher, J. L., & Tabb, R. M. (2010). Client directed voting: Selected issues and design perspectives. Retrieved from http://www.cii.org/files/publications/white_papers/08_31_10_client_directed_voting_white_paper.pdf
  7. Berle, A. A. (1928). Studies in the law of corporation finance. Chicago: Callaghan and Company. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23 Google Scholar
  8. Blais, A., & Rubenson, D. (2013). The source of turnout decline: New values or new contexts? Comparative Political Studies, 46(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bratton, W. W., & Wachter, M. L. (2008). Shareholder primacy’s corporatist origins: Adolf Berle and the modern corporation. Journal of Corporation Law, 34(1), 99–152.Google Scholar
  10. Broadridge. (2015). Letter from Charles V. Callan to Brent J. Fields. Comments on proposed rule 30e-3, investment company reporting modernization, file number S7-08-15. Broadridge. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-08-15/s70815-321.pdf
  11. Broadridge. (2016). Proxy pulse: 2016 proxy season review (3rd ed.). Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Brochet, F., Serafeim, G., & Loumioti, M. (2012). Short-termism: Don’t blame investors. Harvard Business Review, 90(6), 28.Google Scholar
  13. Canadian Securities Administrators. (2012a). CSA consultation paper 33-403 – The standard of conduct for advisers and dealers: Exploring the appropriateness of introducing a statutory best interest duty when advice is provided to retail clients. Ontario Securities Commission. Retrieved from http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/documents/en/Securities-Category3/csa_20121025_33-403_fiduciary-duty.pdf
  14. Canadian Securities Administrators. (2012b). CSA notice of amendments to national instrument 54-101 communication with beneficial owners of securities of a reporting issuer and companion policy 54-101CP communication with beneficial owners of securities of a reporting issuer and amendments to nation. Ontario Securities Commission. Retrieved from http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/documents/en/Securities-Category5/csa_20121129_54-101_amendments.pdf
  15. Canadian Securities Administrators. (2013). CSA consultation paper 54-401: Review of the proxy voting infrastructure. Ontario Securities Commission. Retrieved from http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/documents/en/Securities-Category5/csa_20130815_54-401_proxy-voting.pdf
  16. CFA Institute. (2014). Code of ethics and standards of professional conduct. CFA Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, R. C. (1981). The four stages of capitalism: Reflections on investment management treatises reviewed work(s): The regulation of money managers by Tamar Frankel; the law of investment management by Harvey E. Bines. Harvard Law Review, 94(3), 561–582. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1340677
  18. Clark, G. L. (2011). Myopia and the global financial crisis: Context-specific reasoning, market structure, and institutional governance. Dialogues in Human Geography, 1(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820610386318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, G. L., & Hebb, T. (2004). Pension fund corporate engagement: The fifth stage of capitalism. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 59(1), 142–171. https://doi.org/10.7202/009130ar CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark, G. L., & Viehs, M. (2014). The implications of corporate social responsibility for investors. Oxford. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2481877
  21. Dimson, E., Karakas, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225–3268. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2154724
  22. Donald, D. C. (2007). The Rise and effects of the indirect holding system: How corporate America ceded its shareholders to intermediaries (No. 68). Frankfurt. Retrieved from http://www.ilf-frankfurt.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/ILF_WP_068.pdf
  23. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1827369
  24. Dunlavy, C. A. (2004). From citizens to plutocrats: Nineteenth-century shareholder voting rights and theories of the corporation. In K. Lipartito & D. B. Sicilia (Eds.), Constructing corporate America: History, politics, culture (pp. 1–42). Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251902.001.0001
  25. Fisher, H. A. L. (2015). Frederick William Maitland (Kindle (or)). H.A.L Fisher. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.ca
  26. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man (Kindle). Free Press. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.ca
  27. Gallup. (2016). Survey: Economy and personal finance. Retrieved January 22, 2017, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/191174/americans-financial-worries-edge-2016.aspx
  28. Gaus, G., Courtland, S. D., & Schmidtz, D. (2015). Liberalism. In E. N. Zalta (Eds.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (pp. 1–36). Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/liberalism/
  29. Geisst, C. R. (2012). Wall street: A history, updated edition (Kindle). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.ca
  30. Gerber, A., Green, D., & Larimer, C. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. The American Political Science Review, 102(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540808009X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. (2015). 2014 global sustainable investment review. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  32. Gulinello, C. (2010). The retail-investor vote: Mobilizing rationally apathetic shareholders to preserve or challenge the board’s presumption of authority. Utah Law Review, 547(3), 547–603.Google Scholar
  33. Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. R. (2001). The end of history for corporate law. The Georgetown Law Journal, 1(89), 439–468.Google Scholar
  34. Hartz, L. (1991). The liberal tradition in America (Kindle). New York: Harcourt, Inc. (A Harvest Book). Retrieved from https://www.amazon.ca
  35. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism (Kindle). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.ca
  36. Hirschmann, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty (First (on-)). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://ezproxy-prd.bodleian.ox.ac.uk:2165/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb04043
  37. Hobbes, T. (2009). Leviathan (iBooks). Project Gutenberg ebook. Retrieved from https://www.apple.ca
  38. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Johnson, P. (2010). Making the market: Victorian origins of corporate capitalism (Kindle). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.ca
  40. Knoll, M. A. Z. (2010). The role of behavioral economics and behavioral decision making in Americans’ retirement savings decisions. Social Security Bulletin, 70(4), 1–23.Google Scholar
  41. Kotz, D. M. (2009). The financial and economic crisis of 2008: A systemic crisis of neoliberal capitalism. Review of Radical Political Economics, 41(3), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613409335093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kotz, D. M. (2015). The rise and fall of neoliberal capitalism (Kindle). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.ca
  43. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1999). Investor protection: Origins, consequences, reform, NBER working paper series (Vol. 7428). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lynn, B. M. G. (2017). Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edward Hugler, acting Secretary of Labor, and United States Department of Labor, defendants. Case 3:16-cv-01476-M. Document 137. Filed 02/08/17. Dallas: U.S. district court for the northern district of Texas, Dallas division. Retrieved from http://media.thinkadvisor.com/thinkadvisor/article/2017/02/08/fiduciary-ruling-texas-20170208.pdf
  46. Macfarlane, A. (2002). F.W. Maitland and the making of the modern world (On-line). Cambridge, UK: Palgrave. Retrieved from http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/195762
  47. Mayer, C. (2013). Firm commitment (iBooks). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.apple.ca
  48. Michie, R. (2001a). Introduction. In The London stock exchange: A history (On-line, pp. 1–19). Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199242550.001.0001
  49. Michie, R. (2001b). The London stock exchange: A history (on-line). Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199242550.001.0001
  50. Michie, R. (2007). Origins, trends, and reversals: 1100–1720. In The global securities market: A history (On-line). Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280612.001.0001
  51. Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization (Kindle). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.ca
  52. Miller, P. B. (2014). The fiduciary relationship. In A. S. Gold & P. B. Miller (Eds.), Philosophical foundations of fiduciary law (On-line, pp. 63–90). Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701729.001.0001
  53. Monks, R. A. G., & Minow, N. (2011). Corporate governance (5th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Morgan Stanley. (2014). Understanding your brokerage and investment advisory relationships. Retrieved from http://www.morganstanley.com/wealth-relationshipwithms/pdfs/understandingyourrelationship.pdf
  55. Nagy, Z., Kassam, A., & Lee, L.-E. (2015). Can ESG add alpha? An analysis of ESG tilt and momentum strategies. https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2016.25.2.113
  56. Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups (Kindle). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.ca
  57. Picketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (Hardcover). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Ro, S. (2015). Here’s who owns the stock market. Retrieved January 22, 2017, from http://uk.businessinsider.com/stock-market-ownership-2015-1?r=US&IR=T
  59. Rosenthal, S. M., & Austin, L. S. (2016). The dwindling taxable share of U.S. corporate stock. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/2000790-The-Dwindling-Taxable-Share-of-U.S.-Corporate-Stock.pdf
  60. Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2016, May). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 519–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shareholder Communications Coalition. (2016). Letter from Niels Holch to Brent Fields re: Transfer agent regulations, SEC file no. S7-27-15. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-27-15/s72715-37.pdf
  62. Shareholder Communications Coalition. (2017). Proxy process flow diagram. Retrieved February 7, 2017, from http://www.shareholdercoalition.com/sites/default/files/ProxyFlow2_0.pdf
  63. Sullivan, R. (2015). Fiduciary duty in the 21st century. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2724866
  64. Taylor, Q. (2010). Thomas Hobbes, political economist: His changing historical fortunes. Independent Review, 14(3), 415–433.Google Scholar
  65. Trump, P. D. J. (2017). Presidential memorandum on fiduciary duty rule. Washington, DC: The White House: Office of the Press Secretary. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/02/03/presidential-memorandum-fiduciary-duty-rule
  66. U.S. Department of Labor. (2008). Interpretive bulletin 2008-2 relating to exercise of shareholder rights. Federal Register. Retrieved from http://webapps.dol.gov/FederalRegister/PdfDisplay.aspx?DocId=21630
  67. U.S. Department of Labor. (2017). Consumer protections for retirement investors – FAQS on your rights and financial advisers. Retrieved January 16, 2017, from http://www.cmers.com/CMERS/Public/consumer-protections-for-retirement-investors-your-rights-and-financial-advisers.pdf
  68. U.S. Federal Reserve Board. (2014a). 2013 SCF chartbook. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/files/BulletinCharts.pdf
  69. U.S. Federal Reserve Board. (2014b). Changes in U.S. family finances from 2010 to 2013: Evidence from the survey of consumer finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 100. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/2014/pdf/scf14.pdf
  70. U.S. Federal Reserve Board. (2016). Financial accounts of the United States: Flow of funds, balance sheets, and integrated macroeconomic accounts. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/Current/z1.pdf
  71. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (1971). Speech by William J. Casey: Evolution in the capital markets. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/1971/050571casey.pdf
  72. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (1975). Speech by Philip A. Loomis: The securities act amendments of 1975, self-regulation and the national market system. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/1975/111875loomis.pdf
  73. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (1976). Final report of the Securities and Exchange Commission on the practice of recording the ownership of securities in the records of the issuer in other than the name of the beneficial owner of such securities. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/fsec00unit
  74. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2003). Final rule: Proxy voting by investment advisers. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/ia-2106.htm
  75. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2007). Shareholder choice regarding proxy materials. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2007/34-56135.pdf
  76. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2008a). Guide to broker-dealer registration. Retrieved January 15, 2017, from https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/bdguide.htm
  77. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2008b). Speech by Paul S. Atkins: Shareholder rights, the 2008 proxy season, and the impact of shareholder activism. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2008/spch072208psa.htm
  78. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2010). Concept release on the U.S. proxy system. Release Nos. 34-62495, IA-3052, IC-29340; File No. S7-14-10. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/2010/34-62495.pdf
  79. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2015a). Concept release: Transfer agent regulations (advance notice of proposed rulemaking); request for comment. Washington, DC: Securities Exchange Commission. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/2015/34-76743.pdf
  80. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2015b). Proxy voting roundtable – Transcript of February 19, 2015 webcast. Retrieved January 26, 2017, from https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/proxy-voting-roundtable/proxy-voting-roundtable-transcript.txt
  81. UNPRI. (2017). The six principles. Retrieved February 13, 2017, from https://www.unpri.org/about/the-six-principles
  82. Westbrook, D. A. (2015). Between citizen and state: An introduction to the corporation (On-line). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Robertson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations