D-Case Communicator: A Web Based GSN Editor for Multiple Stakeholders

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10489)

Abstract

This paper presents “D-Case Communicator”, a web-based GSN editor which facilitates co-authoring of GSN diagrams by (possibly) remote stakeholders. D-Case Communicator is easy to use: it can be used in typical web-browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, and Safari; Editing is smooth as it is implemented using recent web technologies. This paper explains basic specification, usage, and design rationale of the tool. D-Case Communicator is available in https://mlab.ce.cst.nihon-u.ac.jp/dcase/.

References

  1. 1.
    Matsuno, Y.: A design and implementation of an assurance case language. In: 44th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, DSN 2014, pp. 630–641, Atlanta, GA, USA, 23–26 June 2014Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Denney, E., Pai, G., Pohl, J.: AdvoCATE: an assurance case automation toolset. In: Ortmeier, F., Daniel, P. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7613, pp. 8–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33675-1_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bishop, P., Bloomfield, R.: A methodology for safety case development. In: Safety-Critical Systems Symposium (SSS 1998) (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Change Vision, Inc.: Astah GSN. http://astah.net/editions/gsn
  5. 5.
    Kelly, T., Weaver, R.: The goal structuring notation - a safety argument notation. In: Proceedings of the Dependable Systems and Networks 2004, Workshop on Assurance Cases (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adelard: Adelard safety case development manual (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eurocontrol: Safety case development manual (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spriggs, J.: GSN—The Goal Structuring Notation: A Structured Approach to Presenting Arguments. Springer, London (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelly, T.: Arguing safety - a systematic approach to safety case management. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilson, S.P., McDermid, J.A., Kirkham, P.M., Fenelon, P.: The safety argument manager: an integrated approach to the engineering and safety assessment of computer based systems. In: IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS 1996), pp. 198–205, Friedrichshafen, Germany, 11–15 March 1996Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsuno, Y., Ishigaki, Y., Bando, K., Kido, H., Tanaka, K.: Developing SNS tool for consensus building on environmental safety using assurance cases. In: Skavhaug, A., Guiochet, J., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9923, pp. 55–62. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45480-1_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Engineering, College of Science and TechnologyNihon UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations