Advertisement

Process Assessment in Supplier Selection for Safety-Critical Systems in Nuclear Domain

  • Timo VarkoiEmail author
  • Risto Nevalainen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10489)

Abstract

Nuclear power plants set strict requirements for their suppliers. Need for digital systems containing software increases as analog technology is maintained and replaced. We have used process assessments to evaluate safety-related systems development and developed a tailored assessment method for that. Selection of a capable supplier is a key to successful system delivery and qualification. Process assessments are found to be a cost-efficient way to analyze systems development. This paper provides a practical example in applying a process assessment method in supplier evaluation. A similar approach could be exploited in other domains, where domain specific requirements are essential. Benefits of the approach are discussed based on the experiences so far.

Keywords

Safety Systems engineering Process assessment Nuclear SPICE 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been jointly funded by the Finnish national nuclear safety program SAFIR2018 (http://safir2018.vtt.fi/) and Finnish Software Measurement Association, FiSMA (www.fisma.fi).

References

  1. 1.
    Finnish Research Program on Nuclear Power Plant Safety. SAFIR2018. http://safir2018.vtt.fi
  2. 2.
    Varkoi, T., Nevalainen, R., Mäkinen, T.: Toward nuclear SPICE – integrating IEC 61508, IEC 60880 and SPICE. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 26, 357–365 (2013). WileyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Automotive SPICE®. http://www.automotivespice.com/. Accessed 11 May 2017
  4. 4.
    Lepmets, M., McCaffery, F., Clarke, P.: Development and benefits of MDevSPICE, the medical device software process assessment framework. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 28(9), 800–816 (2016). WileyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Varkoi, T., Nevalainen, R., Mäkinen, T.: Process assessment in a safety domain - assessment method and results as evidence in an assurance case. In: Proceedings of QUATIC 2016, Lisbon, Portugal, 6–9 September 2016, pp. 52–58. IEEE Computer Society (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015 Systems and software engineering—System life cycle processesGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO/IEC 15289:2015 Systems and software engineering—Content of life cycle information products (documentation)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISO/IEC TS 15504-10:2011 Information technology – Process assessment – Part 10: Safety extensionGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISO/IEC 33020:2015 Information technology – Process assessment – Process measurement framework for assessment of process capabilityGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO/IEC TS 33030:2017 Information technology – Process assessment – An exemplar documented assessment processGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    STUK: Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Management system for a nuclear facility, YVL A.3 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IEC 61513:2011 Nuclear power plants - Instrumentation and control for systems important to safety - General requirements for systemsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    IEC 60880:2006 Nuclear power plants – Instrumentation and control systems important to safety – Software aspects for computer-based systems performing category A functionsGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    IEC 62138:2004 Nuclear power plants – I&C Systems Important to Safety – Software aspects for computer-based systems performing category B or C functionsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Common Position 2014. Licensing of safety critical software for nuclear reactors. Common position of international nuclear regulators and authorised technical support organisations. Western European Nuclear Regulators’ Association (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leadership and Management for Safety, General Safety Requirements. IAEA Safety Standards No. GSR Part 2. IAEA 2016Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ISO/IEC 15026-4:2012 Systems and software engineering – Systems and software assurance – Part 4: Assurance in the life cycleGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Finnish Software Measurement Association – FiSMA ryEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations