Advertisement

DIY Media-Making for Social Change: Hong Kong’s Ethnic Minority Youth Speak Back to Exclusion and Call for Social Action Through Cellphilms

  • Casey Burkholder
Chapter

Abstract

Hong Kong’s 2014 Occupy Movement brought its citizens and residents—both Chinese and ethnic minorities—to the streets in an effort to protest growing Mainland Chinese influence and express a call for increased democratic measures in the territory. Through a participatory visual research project among four ethnic minority youth using semi-structured interviews and DIY media-making with cellphilms (cellphone + filmmaking), the findings indicate that participating in and responding to the Occupy Movement encouraged ethnic minority youth to feel an increased sense of inclusion and belonging in the territory—where they have grown up and studied feeling excluded and isolated.

Keywords

Cellphilms Ethnic minorities Hong Kong Social change Youth 

References

  1. Bagnoli, A. (2009). On an ‘Introspective Journey’: Identities and travel in young people’s lives. European Societies, 11, 325–345.Google Scholar
  2. Buckingham, D. (2009). Speaking back? In search of the citizen journalist. In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Video cultures media technology and everyday creativity (pp. 93–114). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244696_5 Google Scholar
  3. Buckingham, D., & Willett, R. (2013). Digital generations: Children, young people, and the new media. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Burkholder, C. (2013). Just the school makes us non-Chinese’: Contrasting the discourses of Hong Kong’s Education Bureau with the lived experiences of its Non-Chinese Speaking secondary school population. Journal of Educational Research for Social Change, 2(2), 43–58.Google Scholar
  5. Burkholder, C. (2016). We are HK too!: Disseminating cellphilms in a participatory archive. In K. MacEntee, C. Burkholder, & J. Schwab-Cartas (Eds.), What’s a cellphilm?: Integrating mobile phone technology into participatory arts based research and activism. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9_10 Google Scholar
  6. Chen, L., & Feng, G. C. (2015). Host environment, host communication, and satisfaction with life: A study of Hong Kong ethnic minority members. Communication Research, 44(4), 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  8. Dockney, J., & Tomaselli, K. (2009). Fit for the small(er) screen: Films, mobile TV and the new individual television experience. Journal of African Cinema, 1, 126–132.Google Scholar
  9. Dockney, J., & Tomaselli, K. (2010). Third screens, third cinema, third worlds and triadomania: Examining cellphilm aesthetics in visual culture. Communistas, 15(1), 97–111.Google Scholar
  10. Education Bureau. (2014). Initiatives in the 2014 Policy Address: Support for ethnic minorities. Retrieved from www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/student-parents/ncs-students/new/SupportEM-Eng.pdf
  11. Education Bureau. (2015). Non-Chinese speaking parent information package: Your guide to education in Hong Kong. Retrieved from www.edb.gov.hk/en/student-parents/ncs-students/support-to-student-and-parents/package/ncs-parent-information-package-chi_eng.html
  12. Equal Opportunities Commission. (2011). Education for all: Report on the working group on education for ethnic minorities. Retrieved from www.eoc.org.hk/EOC/Upload/UserFiles/File/EducationReportE.pdf
  13. Fiske, J. (1989). Moments of television: Neither the text nor the audience. In E. Seiter, H. Borchers, G. Kreutzner, & A. Warth (Eds.), Remote control: Television, audiences, and cultural power (pp. 56–78). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Gargan, E.A. (1997, July 1). China resumes control of Hong Kong, concluding 156 years of British rule. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0630.html
  15. Garrett, D. P. (2014). Counter-hegemonic resistance in China’s Hong Kong: Visualizing protest in the city. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Garrett, D. P., & Ho, W.-C. (2014). Hong Kong at the brink: Emerging forms of political participation in the new social movement. In J. Cheng (Ed.), New trends of political participation in Hong Kong (pp. 347–384). Hong Kong: City University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gee, J. P. (2014). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Greene, S., Burke, K. J., & McKenna, M. K. (Eds.). (2016). Youth voices, public spaces, and civic engagement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Grimes, S., & Fields, D. A. (2015). Children’s media making, but not sharing: The potential and limitations of child-specific DIY media websites. Media International Australia, 154(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1515400114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris, A. (2005). Future girl: Young women in the twenty-first century. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, A. (Ed.). (2012). Next wave cultures: Feminism, subcultures, activism. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. HKSAR (Hong Kong Special Administrative Region). (2013). Hong Kong 2011 population census thematic report: Ethnic minorities. Retrieved from http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/sp170.jsp?productCode=B1120062.
  23. HKSAR (Hong Kong Special Administrative Region). (2017). The rights of the individual: Race Discrimination Ordinance. Retrieved from www.cmab.gov.hk/en/issues/equal_racebill.htm
  24. Hooks, B. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ingram, L.-A. (2013). Citizen-girls: Girls’ perspectives on gender, citizenship and schooling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, R. H., & Li, N. C. H. (2016). Evidentiary video and “professional vision” in the Hong Kong umbrella movement. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(5), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.04jon CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kahne, J., Hodgin, E., & Eidman-Aadahl, E. (2016). Redesigning civic education for the digital age: Participatory politics and the pursuit of democratic engagement. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1132646 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kennedy, K. J., Hahn, C. L., & Lee, W. O. (2008). Constructing citizenship: Comparing the views of students in Australia, Hong Kong, and the United States. Comparative Education Review, 52(1), 53–91. https://doi.org/10.1086/524306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2010). DIY media: Creating, sharing and learning with new technologies. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  30. Luttrell, W., & Chalfen, R. (2010). Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies, 25(3), 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2010.523270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., & Schwab-Cartas, J. (Eds.). (2016). What’s a cellphilm?: Integrating mobile phone technology into participatory arts based research and activism. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9 Google Scholar
  32. Marshall, T. H. (1977). Class, citizenship and social development: Essays by TH Marshall. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. McIntyre, A., & Lykes, M. B. (2004). Weaving words and pictures in/through feminist participatory action research. In M. Brydon-Miller, P. Maguire, & A. MacIntrye (Eds.), Traveling companions: Feminism, teaching and action research (pp. 57–77). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  34. Milne, E. J., Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of participatory video. New York: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2013). What can a teacher do with a cellphone? Using participatory visual research to speak back in addressing HIV & AIDS. South African Journal of Education, 33(4), 1–13. 10.15700/201412171336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newsom, V. A., & Lengel, L. (2012). Arab women, social media, and the Arab Spring: Applying the framework of digital reflexivity to analyze gender and online activism. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 13(5), 31.Google Scholar
  37. Ng, K-L., & Choi, A. (Producers). (2015). Zune, K., Chow, K.-W., Au, J., Ng, K.-L., & Wong, F.-P. (Directors). Ten years (Motion picture). Hong Kong: Ten Years Studio.Google Scholar
  38. Ngo, J. (2016, February 3). Hong Kong ethnic minorities fall through the cracks. South China Morning Post. Retrieved January 14, 2017, from http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/1909183/hong-kong-ethnic-minorities-fall-through-cracks
  39. Niroula, A. (2014, July 21). Hong Kong’s ethnic minority students lag in Chinese language skills. South China Morning Post. Retrieved January 14, 2017, from www.scmp.com/lifestyle/family-education/article/1556164/hong-kons-ethnic-minority-students-lag-chinese-language
  40. Packham, C. (2008). Active citizenship and community learning. Los Angeles: Learning Matters.Google Scholar
  41. Ratto, M., & Boler, M. (Eds.). (2014). DIY citizenship: Critical making and social media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Rheingold, H. (2008). Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement. In W. L. Bennet (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 97–118). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rogers, M. (2014). Critical filmmaking pedagogies: The complexities of addressing social justice issues with youth in New Brunswick schools. Doctoral dissertation, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.Google Scholar
  44. Shum, M., Gao, F., & Tsung, L. (2011). Unlocking the racialized and gendered educational experience of Asian females in Hong Kong: The case study of Pakistani girls. Asian Ethnicity, 13(3), 1–12.Google Scholar
  45. Soler-i-Martin, R. (2014). Youth political involvement update: Measuring the role of cause-oriented political interest in young people’s activism. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(3), 396–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tanenbaum, J. G., Williams, A. M., Desjardins, A., & Tanenbaum, K. (2013, April). Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2603−2612). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481360
  47. Turner, B. S. (1990). Outline of a theory of citizenship. Sociology, 24(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038590024002002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Velasquez, A., & LaRose, R. (2014). Youth collective activism through social media: The role of collective efficacy. New Media & Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813518391
  49. Wang, C. (1999). Photovoice: Participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wong, S. H.-W. (2015). Electoral politics in post-1997 Hong Kong: Protest, patronage and the media. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Casey Burkholder
    • 1
  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations