Advertisement

Fraudulent Behavior by Entrepreneurs and Borrowers

  • Christa Hainz
Chapter

Abstract

Evidence on fraudulent behavior in crowdfunding is scarce. This does not mean that there is no fraud. Hainz discusses the incentives to engage in fraud in a very simple theoretical model and highlights the role of uncertainty. She shows that the terms of the underlying contract influence the incentives to behave honestly and that a reduction of information asymmetries can help to limit fraud. The fact that we observe hardly any fraud cases may be due to low incentives to detect fraud. Although the costs of gathering information leading to the detection of fraud in crowdfunding might be lower than in the corporate world in general, the benefits might be low as well because many investors participating in a campaign contribute only small amounts and cannot coordinate their efforts to detect fraud. Reviewing the existing evidence on potentially fraudulent behavior by backers, borrowers and entrepreneurs Hainz shows its limitations. She argues that counting fraud cases underestimates the true problem because the incentives to report fraud are limited. The figures on non-deliveries and defaults, however, tend to overestimate the problem as non-fraudulent projects also fail.

References

  1. Burghof, Hans-Peter, and Adrian Hunger. 2004. The Neuer Markt—An (Overly) Risky Asset of Germany’s Financial System. In The Rise and Fall of Europe’s New Stock Markets (Advances in Financial Economics Vol. 10), ed. Giancarlo Giudici and Peter Roosenboom, 295–327. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Conrad, Jennifer, Jonathan Karpoff, Craig Lewis, and Jay R. Ritter. 2016. Statement of the Financial Economists Roundtable: Crowdfunding. Financial Analysts Journal 72: 14–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cumming, Douglas, Robert Dannhauser, and Sofia Johan. 2015. Financial Market Misconduct and Agency Conflicts: A Synthesis and Future Directions. Journal of Corporate Finance 34: 150–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cumming, Douglas, Lars Hornuf, Moein Karami, and Denis Schweizer. 2016. Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding. Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper, No. 16-09. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2828919. Accessed 28 Feb 2017.
  5. Dyck, Alexander, Adair Morse, and Luigi Zingales. 2010. Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud? Journal of Finance 65: 2213–2253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dyck, Alexander, Adair Morse and Luigi Zingales. 2013. How Pervasive is Corporate Fraud? Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 2222608. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2222608
  7. Federal Reserve Board. 2016. Charge-Off and Delinquency Rates on Loans and Leases at Commercial Banks. https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/chargeoff/delallsa.htm. LAst modified 18 May 2016.
  8. Fredman, Catherine. 2015. Fund Me or Fraud Me? Crowdfunding Scams are on the Rise. Consumer Reports, October 5. http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/money/crowdfunding-scam. Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
  9. Gao, Qiang, and Mingfeng Lin. 2015. Lemon or Cherry? The Value of Texts in Debt Crowdfunding. Working Paper. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2446114
  10. Giannetti, Mariassunta, and Tracy Yue Wang. 2016. Corporate Scandals and Household Stock Market Participation. Journal of Finance 71: 2591–2636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson, Rajna, Carmen Tanner, and Alexander F. Wagner. 2013. Preferences for Truthfulness: Heterogeneity Among and Within Individuals. American Economic Review 103: 532–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hildebrand, Thomas, Manju Puri, and Jörg Rocholl. 2017. Adverse Incentives in Crowdfunding. Management Science 63: 587–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hornuf, Lars, and Georg Haas. 2014. Regulating Fraud in Financial Markets: Can Behavioral Designs Prevent Future Criminal Offences? Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions 7: 192–201.Google Scholar
  14. Hornuf, Lars, and Matthias Schmitt. 2016. Success and Failure in Equity Crowdfunding. CESifo DICE Report 14: 16–22.Google Scholar
  15. Hornuf, Lars, and Armin Schwienbacher. 2018. Internet-Based Entrepreneurial Finance: Lessons Form Germany. California Management Review. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  16. Horwitz, Josh. 2016. Your Brilliant Kickstarter Idea Could be on Sale in China Before you’ve Even Finished Funding It. http://qz.com/771727/chinas-factories-in-shenzhen-can-copy-products-at-breakneck-speed-and-its-time-for-the-rest-of-the-world-to-get-over-it/. Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
  17. Iyer, Rajkamal, Asim Ijaz Khwaja, Erzo F.P. Luttmer, and Kelly Shue. 2015. Screening Peers Softly: Inferring the Quality of Small Borrowers. Management Science 62: 1554–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mollick, Ethan R. 2014. Delivery Rates on Kickstarter. Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2699251. Accessed 28 Feb 2017.
  19. Moores, Christopher. 2015. Kickstart My Lawsuit: Fraud and Justice in Rewards-Based Crowdfunding. UC Davies Law Review 49: 383–424.Google Scholar
  20. Morse, Adair. 2015. Peer-to-Peer Crowdfunding: Information and the Potential for Disruption in Consumer Lending. Annual Review of Financial Economics 7: 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nezik, Ann-Kathrin. 2016. Sauercrowd. Spiegel 34: 64–66.Google Scholar
  22. Schwartz, Andrew. 2015. The Nonfinancial Returns of Crowdfunding. Review of Banking and Financial Law 34: 565–580.Google Scholar
  23. Signori, Andrea, and Silvio Vismara. 2016. Returns on Investments in Equity Crowdfunding. Social Science Research Network. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2765488. Accessed 28 Feb 2017.
  24. Vismara, Silvio. 2017. Signaling to Overcome Market Inefficiencies. In The Economics of Crowdfunding Startups, Portals and Investor Behavior, ed. Douglas Cumming and Lars Hornuf. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Wang, Tracy. 2013. Corporate Securities Fraud: Insights from a New Empirical Framework. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 29: 535–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christa Hainz
    • 1
  1. 1.Ifo Institute for Economic ResearchMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations