Conclusion: What Next, What For?

  • Philippe Lorino
Part of the Technology, Work and Globalization book series (TWG)


This book demonstrates a high diversity of situations: the types of managerial techniques involved; their practical effects; the theoretical and methodological frameworks adopted; and the concerned activities. The role of managerial techniques and the analysis of their material dimension are complex issues that, too often, theoretical models tend to over-simplify. Situatedness is a key characteristic. The performativity of managerial techniques and models, far from imposing straightforward social practices, appears as an ambiguous issue. The meanings and practical effects of managerial techniques vary over time and across social space. They are continually involved in pluralist controversies and exploratory inquiries. The material and processual perspective on managerial techniques questions two dualisms strongly established in organization and management studies: the fact-value dualism, and the means-ends dualism.


Ambiguity Contingent performance Controversy Means-end Pluralism Singularity Situatedness Unpredictability Valuation processes 


  1. Borges, J. L. (1946/1974). Del Rigor en la Ciencia. In J. L. Borges, (1946). Historia universal de la infamia. Madrid: Alianza; republished in (1974). Obras Completas. Buenos Aires: Emecé; [available in English translation (A. Hurley Trans.), (2004). A universal history of infamy. London: Penguin Classics].Google Scholar
  2. Dewey, J. (1988). Theory of valuation. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey, The later works, 1925–1953, Vol. 13: 1938–1939 (pp. 191–251). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1939).Google Scholar
  3. Jones, M., Blackwell, A., Prince, K., Meakins, S., Simpson, A., & Vuylsteke, A. (2017). Data as process: From objective resource to contingent performance, 9th International Process Symposium, 22–24 June, Kos, Greece.Google Scholar
  4. Lorino, P., Mourey, D., & Schmidt, G. (2017). Goffman’s theory of frames and situated meaning-making in performance reviews. The case of a category management approach in the French retail sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 58, 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. MacKenzie, D. (2001). Physics and finance: S-terms and modern finance as a topic for science studies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26, 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Muniesa, F. (2011). A flank movement in the understanding of valuation. In L. Adkins & C. Lury (Eds.), Special issue on measure and value, Sociological Review Monograph Series, 59(s2), 24–38.Google Scholar
  7. Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Shewhart, W. A. (1931). Economic control of quality of manufactured products. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company.Google Scholar
  9. Vatin, F. (Ed.). (2009). Évaluer et valoriser. Une sociologie économique de la mesure. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Lorino
    • 1
  1. 1.ESSEC Business SchoolParisFrance

Personalised recommendations