Advertisement

Learning, Teaching, and Social Justice: Eleanor Duckworth’s Perspective

  • Yeh Hsueh
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents Duckworth’s ideas on education in the context of school reform, summarizing both published sources and interviews. Central values of her career are examined: Schools should focus on developing the power and creative capacities of students’ minds, strengthen their understanding so it becomes confident and complex, and help children develop a sense of community responsibility, democratic commitment, and social justice. In a recent interview, she continues to prioritize learners’ engagements with subject matter and express her hopes that joy will return to learning and teaching.

References

  1. Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 24–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Au, W. (2013). Hiding behind high-stakes testing: Meritocracy, objectivity and inequality in U.S. education. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 12(2), 7–19.Google Scholar
  3. Auger, J. L. (2014). The author has the last word: Buddy editing in a first-grade classroom. Harvard Educational Review, 84(3), 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biological Science Curriculum Study. (1994). Innovations in science education survey instrument. Colorado Springs, CO: Biological Science Curriculum Study.Google Scholar
  5. Cavicchi, E. M. (2007). Mirrors, swinging weights, lightbulbs…: Simple experiments and history help a class become a community. In P. Heering & D. Osewold (Eds.), Constructing scientific understanding through contextual teaching (pp. 47–63). Berlin, Germany: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
  6. Cavicchi, E. M. (2008a). Opening possibilities in experimental science and its history: Critical explorations with pendulums and singing tubes. Interchange, 39, 415–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavicchi, E. M. (2008b). Historical experiments in students’ hands: Unfragmenting science through action and history. Science and Education, 17(7), 717–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavicchi, E. M. (2009). Exploring mirrors, recreating science and history, becoming a class community. The New Educator, 5(3), 249–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiu, S. M. (2009). The ancient master painted like me. The New Educator, 5(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cochran-Smith, M. (2000). Gambling on the future. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(4), 259–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Council of the Great City Schools. (2015). Student testing in America’s great city schools: An inventory and preliminary analysis. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools.Google Scholar
  12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Can value added add value to teacher evaluation? Educational Researcher, 44(2), 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Duckworth, E. R. (1973). The having of wonderful ideas. In M. Schwebel & J. Raph (Eds.), Piaget in the classroom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Duckworth, E. R. (1996). “The having of wonderful ideas” and other essays on teaching and learning (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Duckworth, E. R. (2000, March 11). Interview by Y. Hsueh. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Duckworth, E. R. (Ed.). (2001). “Tell me more”: Listening to learners explain. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Duckworth, E. R. (2005a). A reality to which each belongs. In B. S. Engel (Ed.), Holding values: What we mean by progressive education (pp. 142–147). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  19. Duckworth, E. R. (2005b). Critical exploration in the classroom. New Educator, 1(4), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476880500276728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duckworth, E. R. (2006). Introduction. In “The having of wonderful ideas” and other essays on teaching and learning (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  21. Duckworth, E. R. (2009). Helping students get to where ideas can find them. The New Educator, 5(3), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duckworth, E. R. (2010). The soul purpose. Learning Landscapes, 3(2), 21–28.Google Scholar
  23. Duckworth, E. R. (2012, February 16). Confusion, play and postponing certainty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Thinks Big. Retrieved from http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/02/confusion-play-and-postponing-certainty-eleanor-duckworth-harvard-thinks-big/
  24. Duckworth, E. R. (2016, April 26). Interview by Y. Hsueh. Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
  25. Gordon, D. T. (2003). Introduction. In D. T. Gordon (Ed.), A nation reformed? American education 20 years after A Nation at Risk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  26. Haslam, B. (2017, April 10). Letter to Tennessee students. Nashville, TN: State Capital.Google Scholar
  27. Hilliard, A. (2000). Excellence in education versus high-stakes standardized testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(4), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hursh, D. (2013). Raising the stakes: High-stakes testing and the attack on public education in New York. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 574–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hsueh, Y. (1995). From Piaget to pedagogy: A brief history of constructivist teaching movements. Qualifying paper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
  30. Hsueh, Y. (2005a). The lost and found experience: Piaget rediscovered. The Constructivist, 16(1). (Refereed electronic journal of the Association for Constructivist Teaching).Google Scholar
  31. Hsueh, Y. (2005b). Critical exploration in the classroom: Its past and present. In D. Wallace (Ed.), Education arts, and morality: Creative journeys (pp. 121–141). New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hsueh, Y. (2009). Jean Piaget in the United States, 1925–1971. In U. Müller, J. M. Capendale, & L. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hughes-McDonnell, F. (2009). I wonder how this little seed can have so much potential: Critical exploration supports preservice teachers’ development as science researchers and teachers. The New Educator, 5(3), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Inhelder, B., Sinclair, H., & Bovet, M. (1974). Learning and the development of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kamii, C. (1982). Number in preschool and kindergarten. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  36. Layton, L. (2015, October 24). Study says standardized testing is overwhelming nation’s public schools. The Washington Post, Education Column. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/study-says-standardized-testing-is-overwhelming-nations-public-schools/2015/10/24/8a22092c-79ae-11e5-a958-d889faf561dc_story.html?utm_term=.c027847ec710
  37. Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McKinney, A. (2005). Using women working resources in schools: A case study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
  39. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  40. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  41. Nichols, S. L., Berliner, D., & Noddings, N. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  42. Rauchwerk, S. (2003). Incubating knowledge: A narrative account of eight teachers studying chickens. Qualifying Paper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
  43. Ripple, R. E., & Rockcastle, V. N. (Eds.). (1964). Piaget rediscovered. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Schneier, L. (2001). Apprehending poetry. In E. R. Duckworth (Ed.), Tell me more: Listening to learners explain (pp. 42–78). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  46. Schneier, L. (2015). T-440 teaching and learning: “The having of wonderful ideas.” Retrieved from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/course/fall-2015/t440-teaching-and-learning-having-wonderful-ideas-fall-2015

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yeh Hsueh
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational Psychology and ResearchUniversity of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations